Sturmpioneers able to have a shreck and minesweepers

Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2016, 23:38 PMBanillo

while at fixing things make it so that sappers or echelons cant take any weapons when they equip mine sweapeers. would be fair right?

Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2016, 23:18 PMCruzz

Suppressed 33% grenade range inconsistencies:

Sturmpioneer vet nades not affected
Hammer tommy satchel not affected
Lieutenant grenade not affected
Ostheer commander stun nades not affected
Partisan nade not affected
Fusilier nade not affected
Obersoldaten smoke nade affected (but falls not, no other smoke nades affected)

Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2016, 23:18 PMCruzz

JagdTiger will no longer get stunned by IS2, Relic accidentally deleted that part of the deflection as well.

For that matter ISU152 and KV2 were not changed in terms of deflection stuns, so it only affected IS2, Tiger I(+Ace) and King Tiger.

SturmTiger can't get abandoned while reloading if its between 75% and 50% health because Relic removed one of the abandon checks.

Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2016, 23:18 PMCruzz

USF 81mm mortar (also affects mortar HT) has 106 range (same as 120mm), fastest firing mortar in the game with a 1.6 sec advantage over ostheer one, and about half the scatter of any other mortar in the game plus scatter reduction veterancy at vet1 and vet2.

Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2016, 23:21 PMKyle_RE

Yes, both will be fixed in the patch later this week.

Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2016, 23:43 PMMr.Smith

The last one is not a bug per-se, but it seems like a major oversight.

Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2016, 23:38 PMBanillo

while at fixing things make it so that sappers or echelons cant take any weapons when they equip mine sweapeers. would be fair right?

Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2016, 23:21 PMKyle_RE

Yes, both will be fixed in the patch later this week.

Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2016, 23:43 PMMr.Smith

Could you add some of the bugs reported by Cruzz on the OP?

Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2016, 06:00 AMIron Emperor

OKW LeFH only having 3 vet will also be fixed?

Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2016, 16:43 PMMr.Smith

Am I the only one wondering why OKW merits to have a 5-star LeFH (which will be better than the OST equivalent that costs exactly the same), to begin with?
- No teching costs involved to unlock LeFH
- No price difference (hey, at least for P4 and P5, increased fuel price acts as a bottleneck)
- The fact that OKW is a fuel-bottlenecked faction, not an MP-bottleneck faction (and LeFH costs only manpower)
- The fact that OKW has looser constraints with respect to popcap than OST.

Don't get me wrong:
- Give 5-vet to OKW LeFH
- Just make sure that the 3-vet OST LeFH is better in some areas than the 5-vet OKW LeFH and worse in some other areas
- .. because those two units cost exactly the same!
- (you are allowed to change Veterancy thresholds so that OKW achieves 5-star LeFH at the same time OST would achieve a 3-star LeFH)

In short; don't make one better than the other. Make them different!

Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2016, 16:43 PMMr.Smith

Am I the only one wondering why OKW merits to have a 5-star LeFH (which will be better than the OST equivalent that costs exactly the same), to begin with?
- No teching costs involved to unlock LeFH
- No price difference (hey, at least for P4 and P5, increased fuel price acts as a bottleneck)
- The fact that OKW is a fuel-bottlenecked faction, not an MP-bottleneck faction (and LeFH costs only manpower)
- The fact that OKW has looser constraints with respect to popcap than OST.

Don't get me wrong:
- Give 5-vet to OKW LeFH
- Just make sure that the 3-vet OST LeFH is better in some areas than the 5-vet OKW LeFH and worse in some other areas
- .. because those two units cost exactly the same!
- (you are allowed to change Veterancy thresholds so that OKW achieves 5-star LeFH at the same time OST would achieve a 3-star LeFH)

In short; don't make one better than the other. Make them different!

Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2016, 16:43 PMMr.Smith

Am I the only one wondering why OKW merits to have a 5-star LeFH (which will be better than the OST equivalent that costs exactly the same), to begin with?
- No teching costs involved to unlock LeFH
- No price difference (hey, at least for P4 and P5, increased fuel price acts as a bottleneck)
- The fact that OKW is a fuel-bottlenecked faction, not an MP-bottleneck faction (and LeFH costs only manpower)
- The fact that OKW has looser constraints with respect to popcap than OST.

Don't get me wrong:
- Give 5-vet to OKW LeFH
- Just make sure that the 3-vet OST LeFH is better in some areas than the 5-vet OKW LeFH and worse in some other areas
- .. because those two units cost exactly the same!
- (you are allowed to change Veterancy thresholds so that OKW achieves 5-star LeFH at the same time OST would achieve a 3-star LeFH)

In short; don't make one better than the other. Make them different!

Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2016, 17:37 PMempyriumm

Lol what a biased strategist !

Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2016, 05:48 AMAustralian Magic

Well... But what's the problem with having sweeper and schreck? I mean RE and RE can have sweeper and other upgrade so why SP cannot? The only problem I see is combo of schreck+flamerthrower+sweeper.