Posts: 74
5 MP40s would be cool. I thought even 3 STGs would be a better addition.
Why can't OKW have an unlockable weapons rack?
I'm not big on the crushing being removed.
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
What's the solution to American zookeepers blobbing?
Posts: 1096
What's the solution to American zookeepers blobbing?
Posts: 526
-expensive infantry
-weaker handheld at vs stronger axis armour values
-need at least two bazookas to be worthwhile so that cripples the AI potency of the squad-which is exactly how it should be.
However I think USF blobbing will decrease with the coming patch now that HMG may be viable and they have mortars. Until now all they really have is Rifles and officers.
Posts: 414
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
If OKW schreck blobbing is an issue (I think it is an issue), why isn't the zook blobbing being treated as the same issue in a different faction?
It's essentially the same. Even if the Schrecks are better they are more expensive and limited to one.
Posts: 1930
Posts: 414
Its not though
Posts: 1930
Functionally, exactly the same. Almost worse, If you consider it's easier for americans to feild way more at guns.
So OKW schreck blobs dead, but American AT blobs are ok.
All the answers for schreck blobs are the same answers to zook blobs.
Posts: 7
Build a Puma and stop asking for buff.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
If OKW schreck blobbing is an issue (I think it is an issue), why isn't the zook blobbing being treated as the same issue in a different faction?
It's essentially the same. Even if the Schrecks are better they are more expensive and limited to one.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
Functionally, exactly the same. Almost worse, If you consider it's easier for americans to feild way more at guns.
So OKW schreck blobs dead, but American AT blobs are ok.
All the answers for schreck blobs are the same answers to zook blobs.
Posts: 794
They are good enough to blob with, AT nade mediums and kill them.
Zooks are good but not good enough to blob with,
Posts: 278
In other words, raketen has all the wonderful features, but none of them proper for an AT gun, that's actualy the problem.
And ZIS it's a wonderful AT compared to it. In fact, any soviet crew is wonderful because of its resilience. Having resilience (because of six men crew) it has the chance to see late game. And when a unit sees late game, it means experience added. And experience added is the most valuable thing in this game. That's a chapter where raketen has big issues.
Posts: 174
Posts: 509 | Subs: 1
Posts: 40
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
JohnnyB watch your player card and think.... okw has the strongest start, they have the heaviest tank and it is not a call in, the cheapest infantry and u cry? l2p okw
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
I don't understand how anyone can think a faction with ALL of the following non-doctrinal units are weak w/ AT, at any point of the game:
-Tier 0 anti-tank gun (recently buffed, can camouflage, can garrison, can retreat)
-Tier 0 infantry that has a vehicle snare
-Tier 0 infantry that has Panzershrek
-Puma, light tank hunter that hard counters all Allied light vehicles and armor; reliably penetrates most Allied mediums
-not one but TWO dedicated tank destroyers w/ tremendous survivability due to high armor: Jagdpanzer IV and Panther
-Tier 0 best heavy tank in the game that kills Allied tank destroyers in 2-3 shots and reliably kills 2-3 models every time it shoots at Allied infantry
How can you say with a straight face OKW needs AT buffs at this point? I almost think OKW has too much AT as the patch currently stands (e.g., if Shreks go to Sturms, Volks probably don't need snare anymore). Yes, its anti-tank gun is (arguably) less survivable than other ATGs, but so what? It can cloak, it can garrison, it's cheap, you can always build it no matter what tech you choose, and it can retreat.
I don't know. I feel like when you have so many armored options that are statistically superior across the board than Allied counterparts, maybe you don't need to have the best anti-tank infantry / weapon teams too...
 |
|
|
120 | ||
 |
|
|
45 | ||
 |
|
|
18 | ||
 |
|
|
204 | ||
|
|
|
|
148 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
3 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
