Login

russian armor

OKW (balance preview mode) - concerns and solutions

PAGES (10)down
17 Jun 2016, 18:59 PM
#181
avatar of PencilBatRation

Posts: 794

If you like the 2x downgraded STGs for 60 munis, then that is probably because you don't like to face stronger volks. (I am assuming you don't play as OKW at all.)



OKW has to spend every single muni they can get and that is why they got scavenge as a non-doc ability.


Vet 3 RM have literally no upkeep cost as they don't lose a single model.

Volks vet is inferior to all the other baseline inf, Tommies don't even need vet to wreck volks and obers since they have a received accuracy of 0.7 and the highest ROF of any rifle based unit, and can pick up 2 different types of strong LMGs.
17 Jun 2016, 19:54 PM
#182
avatar of GenObi

Posts: 556

If you like the 2x downgraded STGs for 60 munis, then that is probably because you don't like to face stronger volks. (I am assuming you don't play as OKW at all.



OKW has to spend every single muni they can get and that is why they got scavenge as a non-doc ability.


Vet 3 RM have literally no upkeep cost as they don't lose a single model.

Volks vet is inferior to all the other baseline inf, Tommies don't even need vet to wreck volks and obers since they have a received accuracy of 0.7 and the highest ROF of any rifle based unit, and can pick up 2 different types of strong LMGs.


I think your trying to hard...
17 Jun 2016, 20:02 PM
#183
avatar of PencilBatRation

Posts: 794

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Jun 2016, 19:54 PMGenObi


I think your trying to hard...
"your" not putting enough effort into your shit posts though.


Nothing wrong with trying a bit harder and actually being useful.
17 Jun 2016, 20:04 PM
#184
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8


Nothing wrong with trying a bit harder and actually being useful.

Well, at least you got the first part covered.
17 Jun 2016, 20:08 PM
#185
avatar of PencilBatRation

Posts: 794

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Jun 2016, 20:04 PMKatitof

Well, at least you got the first part covered.
You don't want me to post your photo here again, do you.


You illegal immigrant, you.:lol:
17 Jun 2016, 22:05 PM
#186
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

If you like the 2x downgraded STGs for 60 munis, then that is probably because you don't like to face stronger volks. (I am assuming you don't play as OKW at all.)



OKW has to spend every single muni they can get and that is why they got scavenge as a non-doc ability.


Vet 3 RM have literally no upkeep cost as they don't lose a single model.

Volks vet is inferior to all the other baseline inf, Tommies don't even need vet to wreck volks and obers since they have a received accuracy of 0.7 and the highest ROF of any rifle based unit, and can pick up 2 different types of strong LMGs.


I like the postpatch OKW a lot, and I love the concept of the army.

OKW swims in muni because only sinks are 60 muni upgrades, mines, and nades. They have best early map control and always swim in munis.

Vet 3 RM have high upkeep lol

Volks offensive vet, self healing and vision boost at vet 4 (right?) makes them trade effectively at most ranges, specially with nade usage
17 Jun 2016, 22:50 PM
#187
avatar of GenObi

Posts: 556

"your" not putting enough effort into your shit posts though.


Nothing wrong with trying a bit harder and actually being useful.


Sorry bro, accurate no effort responses for shit post.

Got a problem with it then playcard please to see if you actually know what your talking about, because honestly it sounds like you dont.
18 Jun 2016, 01:50 AM
#188
avatar of PencilBatRation

Posts: 794



I like the post patch OKW a lot, and I love ...
Each to their own then:wub::wub::wub::wub::wub:


20 Jun 2016, 09:42 AM
#189
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Jun 2016, 17:53 PMNEVEC



Hahah, lol no.


cheery picking much?
20 Jun 2016, 10:55 AM
#190
avatar of NEVEC

Posts: 708 | Subs: 1



cheery picking much?


Thats how everyone discuss on this forum since i opened it first time in 2013.
20 Jun 2016, 11:33 AM
#191
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Jun 2016, 10:55 AMNEVEC


Thats how everyone discuss on this forum since i opened it first time in 2013.



So?
Neglecting my points and selecting sentences completely not in line with what my point was, is not a way to discuss anything.
Also it does not make your argument true.
20 Jun 2016, 11:48 AM
#192
avatar of SolidSteel

Posts: 74

Wow at the bias wars in this thread.

Now if we're talking stg's why not actually make it 120 mun 5 Stgs, shifting the volks into a shock unit, also make it restricted to vet 2 or T2 so it's not just abused and spammed.

Now that would be a nice flavor and utility change.
20 Jun 2016, 11:53 AM
#193
avatar of Aradan

Posts: 1003

Wow at the bias wars in this thread.

Now if we're talking stg's why not actually make it 120 mun 5 Stgs, shifting the volks into a shock unit, also make it restricted to vet 2 or T2 so it's not just abused and spammed.

Now that would be a nice flavor and utility change.


With 5 Stg44 they become too strong. No more reasons for build Ubers (WafenSS), or using doctrinal infantry.
20 Jun 2016, 11:57 AM
#194
avatar of SolidSteel

Posts: 74

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Jun 2016, 11:53 AMAradan


With 5 Stg44 they become too strong. No more reasons for build Ubers (WafenSS), or using doctrinal infantry.


Hmm, they would suck hard at anything beyond medium range or in cover, obers will still be superior vet 0, and way better when vetted up and lmg.

Maybe restrict the dmg profile of the stgs a long range so they dont nuke everything at vet 5 but i still solidly believe that 5 stgs capped behind vet/tech and 120 mun would not break them, and would add a solid shock option for them.
20 Jun 2016, 13:37 PM
#195
avatar of Aradan

Posts: 1003



Hmm, they would suck hard at anything beyond medium range or in cover, obers will still be superior vet 0, and way better when vetted up and lmg.

Maybe restrict the dmg profile of the stgs a long range so they dont nuke everything at vet 5 but i still solidly believe that 5 stgs capped behind vet/tech and 120 mun would not break them, and would add a solid shock option for them.


In your logic, can Consripts become Shock troops in the same way of upgrade.
20 Jun 2016, 14:29 PM
#196
avatar of SolidSteel

Posts: 74

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Jun 2016, 13:37 PMAradan


In your logic, can Consripts become Shock troops in the same way of upgrade.


Of course, after all cons do partially become shocks, as they have the ppsh upgrade, that doesnt mean they should match the power level of the actual shock troops, but the option is there to take it.

The same could be true for volks, you just have to play around with the number so you can create the option without breaking the unit.
PAGES (10)down
2 users are browsing this thread: 2 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

755 users are online: 1 member and 754 guests
pipingprojectsus
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49857
Welcome our newest member, dola789ski
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM