Bofors opinion poll
28 May 2016, 17:37 PM
#1
Posts: 414
I'm curious to see the communities consensus on this topic.
28 May 2016, 17:41 PM
#2
Posts: 794
UKF.ORG confirmed.
9/10 topics about brits
Reduce the rate of fire and it will be mostly fine
9/10 topics about brits
Reduce the rate of fire and it will be mostly fine
28 May 2016, 17:47 PM
#3
Posts: 401
So you were the dude that posted the Brits are cancer post, right?
Ok, I voted other because I don't even use the Bofor at all, i always go AEC.
Eventhough i must agree that the Bofors are extremely annoying to counter as Ostheer, but I don't think it is all Brits' fault that they are a bad-designed faction, it's also because Ostheer has been left abandoned for too long. Brits lack mobile non-doc arty unit which for aggressive player, building the pit is just not really fun and worth the price. Seriously, I just want a normal mortar and AEC for early AT unit, no Bofor, no pit. (Yes I mainly play 2v2 as Brits, but i don't go cancer emplacements spam)
Ok, I voted other because I don't even use the Bofor at all, i always go AEC.
Eventhough i must agree that the Bofors are extremely annoying to counter as Ostheer, but I don't think it is all Brits' fault that they are a bad-designed faction, it's also because Ostheer has been left abandoned for too long. Brits lack mobile non-doc arty unit which for aggressive player, building the pit is just not really fun and worth the price. Seriously, I just want a normal mortar and AEC for early AT unit, no Bofor, no pit. (Yes I mainly play 2v2 as Brits, but i don't go cancer emplacements spam)
28 May 2016, 17:56 PM
#4
Posts: 414
I've never referred to the brits as cancer.
I agree that the brits need some love.
I mostly play OKW and don't schreck blob.
I agree that the brits need some love.
I mostly play OKW and don't schreck blob.
28 May 2016, 17:56 PM
#5
Posts: 97
Maybe it needs a slight adjustment, like a small diminution of the rate of fire as said above.
But in my opinion, the Bofors is practically balanced at the moment. It is far from what it was at the release of the UKF lol.
But in my opinion, the Bofors is practically balanced at the moment. It is far from what it was at the release of the UKF lol.
28 May 2016, 17:57 PM
#6
Posts: 414
Maybe it needs a slight adjustment, like a small diminution of the rate of fire as said above.
But in my opinion, the Bofors is practically balanced at the moment. It is far from what it was at the release of the UKF lol.
Strongly disagree. lol
28 May 2016, 17:59 PM
#7
Posts: 97
You're in your right 
28 May 2016, 18:04 PM
#8
Posts: 960
"It needs a nerf"
Personally, I'd remove every emplacement from the game (other than MG emplacements) - so all OKW, UKF, OST, etc. emplacements. However that's never going to happen, I'd say it just needs a slight nerf.
Barrage needs to have slightly less range than an AT gun and it needs a SLIGHT reduction in ROF. The range nerf is obvious (can't hard-counter your counters), the ROF nerf is due to gren squads being tiny, and often getting wiped regardless of what the player does (retreat, move, etc.).
Personally, I'd remove every emplacement from the game (other than MG emplacements) - so all OKW, UKF, OST, etc. emplacements. However that's never going to happen, I'd say it just needs a slight nerf.
Barrage needs to have slightly less range than an AT gun and it needs a SLIGHT reduction in ROF. The range nerf is obvious (can't hard-counter your counters), the ROF nerf is due to gren squads being tiny, and often getting wiped regardless of what the player does (retreat, move, etc.).
Opinions reflect all team modes (not 1v1)
I often edit my posts several times after posting
I often edit my posts several times after posting
28 May 2016, 18:17 PM
#9
Posts: 1096
Strongly disagree. lol
where is the 'buff needed' option for the poll. lol
28 May 2016, 19:28 PM
#10
Posts: 609
Bofors only real issue is the 80 range barrage countering its counters and possibly its accuracy against retreating targets being too high and punishing flanking attempts. IMO, the mortar pit is the bigger issue here, especially against Ostheer.
28 May 2016, 21:21 PM
#11
Posts: 2561
Bofors could use a nerf, but people on this forum get way too crazy when it comes to emplacements.
Simply removing or lowering damage on the barrage so it can't counter it's counters on it's own is more then enough. Anything else will make it underpowered.
Simply removing or lowering damage on the barrage so it can't counter it's counters on it's own is more then enough. Anything else will make it underpowered.
28 May 2016, 23:42 PM
#12
Posts: 1124
I voted for "its not fun to play against"
Simply because it isnt. Been saying that about emplacements in general for a while now.
Terrible game play, terrible design.
Anything for relic to get a quick dollar tho
Simply because it isnt. Been saying that about emplacements in general for a while now.
Terrible game play, terrible design.
Anything for relic to get a quick dollar tho
29 May 2016, 00:00 AM
#13
Posts: 928
IMO, take out the indirect fire ability and it will be perfectly fine. I have no idea why Relic decided to add that.
Had fun doing this earlier
29 May 2016, 01:26 AM
#14
1 
Posts: 2885
Just needs some minor tweaks, like noticable pop increase to increase its cost over time and make it harder to gather army behing emplacement wall. Same should go for mortar pit.
29 May 2016, 07:21 AM
#15
Posts: 97
IMO, take out the indirect fire ability and it will be perfectly fine. I have no idea why Relic decided to add that.
Because, at the moment, without it, the Bofors is totally useless and unplayable.
If you remove this ability, you need to seriously buff others stats ( like range first ), or seriously reduce its cost because it would be easily destroyed by any AT gun. ( which is an >Anti-Tank< gun, not an Anti-Emplacement gun )
We talk about balancing here, not about murdering a unit because you don't want to play against.
29 May 2016, 08:02 AM
#16
Posts: 149 | Subs: 1
just remove attack ground on bofor and make limited 1 or 2. 
29 May 2016, 08:03 AM
#17
Posts: 955
Just a minor tweak- replace the barrage ability with flare and give a barrage to 17pdr
"Nice. Very impressive. Now let´s see Paul Allen´s playercard."
29 May 2016, 15:26 PM
#18
Posts: 414
Because, at the moment, without it, the Bofors is totally useless and unplayable.
If you remove this ability, you need to seriously buff others stats ( like range first ), or seriously reduce its cost because it would be easily destroyed by any AT gun. ( which is an >Anti-Tank< gun, not an Anti-Emplacement gun )
We talk about balancing here, not about murdering a unit because you don't want to play against.
AT guns are the counters to most other emplacements and buildings. I know this because thats what everyone uses to kill my okw trucks.
29 May 2016, 17:58 PM
#19
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
IMO Minor Tweaks either remove Barrage and give it native suppression like Brad suggested a while back or reduce the barrage range a smidge
29 May 2016, 18:02 PM
#20
Posts: 1122
BIAS poool/10, where option to buff it?
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
32 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
229 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
 |
|
|
17 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
403 users are online:
403 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49063
Welcome our newest member, jennifermary
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, jennifermary
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM