Login

russian armor

Bofors opinion poll

What's your opinion on the Bofors
Option Distribution Votes
27%
19%
20%
2%
19%
10%
2%
Total votes: 135
Vote VOTE! Vote ABSTAIN
28 May 2016, 17:37 PM
#1
avatar of sinthe

Posts: 414

I'm curious to see the communities consensus on this topic.
28 May 2016, 17:41 PM
#2
avatar of PencilBatRation

Posts: 794

UKF.ORG confirmed.

9/10 topics about brits



Reduce the rate of fire and it will be mostly fine
28 May 2016, 17:47 PM
#3
avatar of William Christensen

Posts: 401

So you were the dude that posted the Brits are cancer post, right?

Ok, I voted other because I don't even use the Bofor at all, i always go AEC.

Eventhough i must agree that the Bofors are extremely annoying to counter as Ostheer, but I don't think it is all Brits' fault that they are a bad-designed faction, it's also because Ostheer has been left abandoned for too long. Brits lack mobile non-doc arty unit which for aggressive player, building the pit is just not really fun and worth the price. Seriously, I just want a normal mortar and AEC for early AT unit, no Bofor, no pit. (Yes I mainly play 2v2 as Brits, but i don't go cancer emplacements spam)
28 May 2016, 17:56 PM
#4
avatar of sinthe

Posts: 414

I've never referred to the brits as cancer.

I agree that the brits need some love.

I mostly play OKW and don't schreck blob.
28 May 2016, 17:56 PM
#5
avatar of Crystal

Posts: 97

Maybe it needs a slight adjustment, like a small diminution of the rate of fire as said above.

But in my opinion, the Bofors is practically balanced at the moment. It is far from what it was at the release of the UKF lol.
28 May 2016, 17:57 PM
#6
avatar of sinthe

Posts: 414

jump backJump back to quoted post28 May 2016, 17:56 PMCrystal
Maybe it needs a slight adjustment, like a small diminution of the rate of fire as said above.

But in my opinion, the Bofors is practically balanced at the moment. It is far from what it was at the release of the UKF lol.


Strongly disagree. lol
28 May 2016, 17:59 PM
#7
avatar of Crystal

Posts: 97

You're in your right :p
28 May 2016, 18:04 PM
#8
avatar of Doomlord52

Posts: 960

"It needs a nerf"

Personally, I'd remove every emplacement from the game (other than MG emplacements) - so all OKW, UKF, OST, etc. emplacements. However that's never going to happen, I'd say it just needs a slight nerf.

Barrage needs to have slightly less range than an AT gun and it needs a SLIGHT reduction in ROF. The range nerf is obvious (can't hard-counter your counters), the ROF nerf is due to gren squads being tiny, and often getting wiped regardless of what the player does (retreat, move, etc.).
28 May 2016, 18:17 PM
#9
avatar of Grim

Posts: 1096

jump backJump back to quoted post28 May 2016, 17:57 PMsinthe


Strongly disagree. lol


where is the 'buff needed' option for the poll. lol
28 May 2016, 19:28 PM
#10
avatar of Waegukin

Posts: 609

Bofors only real issue is the 80 range barrage countering its counters and possibly its accuracy against retreating targets being too high and punishing flanking attempts. IMO, the mortar pit is the bigger issue here, especially against Ostheer.
28 May 2016, 21:21 PM
#11
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

Bofors could use a nerf, but people on this forum get way too crazy when it comes to emplacements.

Simply removing or lowering damage on the barrage so it can't counter it's counters on it's own is more then enough. Anything else will make it underpowered.
28 May 2016, 23:42 PM
#12
avatar of Intelligence209

Posts: 1124

I voted for "its not fun to play against"

Simply because it isnt. Been saying that about emplacements in general for a while now.

Terrible game play, terrible design.

Anything for relic to get a quick dollar tho
29 May 2016, 00:00 AM
#13
avatar of hubewa

Posts: 928

IMO, take out the indirect fire ability and it will be perfectly fine. I have no idea why Relic decided to add that.
29 May 2016, 01:26 AM
#14
avatar of ferwiner
Donator 11

Posts: 2885

Just needs some minor tweaks, like noticable pop increase to increase its cost over time and make it harder to gather army behing emplacement wall. Same should go for mortar pit.
29 May 2016, 07:21 AM
#15
avatar of Crystal

Posts: 97

jump backJump back to quoted post29 May 2016, 00:00 AMhubewa
IMO, take out the indirect fire ability and it will be perfectly fine. I have no idea why Relic decided to add that.


Because, at the moment, without it, the Bofors is totally useless and unplayable.

If you remove this ability, you need to seriously buff others stats ( like range first ), or seriously reduce its cost because it would be easily destroyed by any AT gun. ( which is an >Anti-Tank< gun, not an Anti-Emplacement gun )

We talk about balancing here, not about murdering a unit because you don't want to play against.
29 May 2016, 08:02 AM
#16
avatar of Zyswen

Posts: 149 | Subs: 1

just remove attack ground on bofor and make limited 1 or 2. :thumb:
29 May 2016, 08:03 AM
#17
avatar of adamírcz

Posts: 956

Just a minor tweak- replace the barrage ability with flare and give a barrage to 17pdr
29 May 2016, 15:26 PM
#18
avatar of sinthe

Posts: 414

jump backJump back to quoted post29 May 2016, 07:21 AMCrystal


Because, at the moment, without it, the Bofors is totally useless and unplayable.

If you remove this ability, you need to seriously buff others stats ( like range first ), or seriously reduce its cost because it would be easily destroyed by any AT gun. ( which is an >Anti-Tank< gun, not an Anti-Emplacement gun )

We talk about balancing here, not about murdering a unit because you don't want to play against.


AT guns are the counters to most other emplacements and buildings. I know this because thats what everyone uses to kill my okw trucks.
29 May 2016, 17:58 PM
#19
avatar of EtherealDragon

Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1

IMO Minor Tweaks either remove Barrage and give it native suppression like Brad suggested a while back or reduce the barrage range a smidge
29 May 2016, 18:02 PM
#20
avatar of Jadame!

Posts: 1122

BIAS poool/10, where option to buff it?
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

United States 27
Russian Federation 4
unknown 4

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

843 users are online: 1 member and 842 guests
NigelBallsworth
2 posts in the last 24h
10 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50010
Welcome our newest member, yresearcher
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM