Posts: 747 | Subs: 2
What you seem to be discounting is the fact the panther have a considerably longer reload/cool down. The comet on the other hand he much better rear armour, speed and accuracy on the move. Once the panther is forced to move any advantage it had was gone. Missing a shot for a panther is not a good situation. As for the veterancy, comets get much faster and gets better turret rotation. Generally speed/mobility/consistency > amour/health.
 | Playercard of RedT3rror | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 7
I´ll join. Brits changed Coh2 to the worst.
It´s just an accumulation of abusive non fun features (emplacements, tulips, a sniper that counters light vehicles) the best tanks in the game hands down (Croc + Comet) and strong infantry (Bren or Piat blob + 5 man upgrade). It is Ostheer on steroids. Thus Ostheer can´t participate in the game effectively. This can´t be balanced in any possible scenario.
The really retarded point is that Coh2 was about mobility. Now there is a faction that can sit around and break the concept of Coh2 with superior defensive tools. It would be fine if the Brit player was punished for sitting around. But he gets rewarded with superior lategame. Thus being a dick and sitting around on your lazy ass is rewarded with a likely win. The British faction encourages bad gameplay.
Posts: 414
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
I just played a 2v2 random game with brits cancer doc into comets, 2nd 2v2 game with brits ever.
won.
Posts: 1124
Posts: 414
Brits are so OP in 2s that you have won 2 games and lost 3
So why don't you talk about the ones you have lost?
____
MHT and wait till Relic removes bofors' barrage or decreases range.
Posts: 1124
Posts: 1930
OP clearly is stating OH vs British is the problem, then you have people come in and say "well okw has"
Wtf. OH is not OKW
Posts: 1124
ost panther is cheaper than the comet and will win against the comet. against medium tanks the ost can use stug for cost effective.
Posts: 1930
I'm just not even gonna bother with this one...
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
Your dismissive attitude is an issue. The brits balance is obviously an issue. If it's not post a 2v2 against double brits using the simcity creep strategy.
Posts: 593
He's not wrong. British faction is one of the worst-designed factions in all of RTS history. Playing it has to be the least-fun any one person can go through for a game that's suppose to, you know, ACTUALLY BE FUN.
lelic sh*t game design ftl.
Posts: 593
i think firesparks will woop u lol hes a good player and plays all factions probably unlike u 1 factionaire. hes right wat he was saying but ppl wana be noob cuz they want things to be easy. i play all factions and allies are the most challenging. theres way to much micro compared to axis and the units die faster. when i have a panther i feel like nothing can stop me. running through atguns and other tanks knowing im not gona get penetrated. and i can go kill tons knowing im not gona lose the panther. i can never use a ally tank like a panther feels op when im using it. but im not gona say it is cuz i dont think it is
My dad can beat your dad up.
Posts: 74
ill teach u how to play vs brits message me ill make u elite. i train alot of ppl for fun to keep the game more competitive. pm me
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Don't even bother arguing with Australian magic. He is 1 of 3 people that defend emplacements No matter what.
As our lead strategy guy says. "Anyone who defends bofers is an idiot"
Why you think every time someone brings up emplacements vs OH, like a little kid he points his finger and says "well okw has..."
Moronic replies
Posts: 175
that's not a valid argument for the discussion at hand.
Posts: 1930
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pooh-pooh
As for OP's problems, I think a nerf to bofors barrage and mortar pit range (that someone suggested in a thread) would solve most of them. Sim city stalling into late game is too rewarding atm.
My dad can beat your dad up.
 |
|
|
43 | ||
 |
|
|
130 | ||
|
|
|
|
12 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
