Login

russian armor

Nerf Panzerfusiliers

12 May 2016, 08:10 AM
#1
avatar of Carlos Danger

Posts: 362

At 290MP and 6 popcap, I think Panzerfusiliers are slightly overperforming and could do with a very small nerf. I'd like to suggest the following changes:

- MP cost from 290 to 330
- Popcap from 6 to 7 (normalizes them with most other line infantry units)
- Gewehr 43 upgrade no longer gives increased sight (mostly just to encourage use of the flare ability)

That's all.
12 May 2016, 08:13 AM
#2
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Umm... no.
Only pop cap suggestion make any sense.
12 May 2016, 08:48 AM
#3
avatar of The amazing Chandler

Posts: 1355

Umm, yes.
They are way to good for their cost. They have everything, weapon upgrade, nade, snare and are 6 man.
12 May 2016, 08:54 AM
#4
avatar of insaneHoshi

Posts: 911

Umm, yes.
They are way to good for their cost. They have everything, weapon upgrade, nade, snare and are 6 man.


Except their weapon upgrade is outclassed by brens, bars, and 1919s

Except their snare has low pen.

Except they have little received accuracy bonuses.
12 May 2016, 09:10 AM
#5
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



Except their weapon upgrade is outclassed by brens, bars, and 1919s

Since you're talking about dual upgrades here, its 90mun vs 120-140mun.
Not sure what you expected here.

Except their snare has low pen.

Exactly the same as any other snare in game.

Except they have little received accuracy bonuses.

And, next to penals, highest accuracy bonuses.

Pfussiliers right now are what penals are becoming next patch.
When both will be upgraded, they'll be about the same with penals being better vs cover and garrisons and pfussies being better vs light cover, open shoot-outs and will provide more utility(nades, AT nades, flare).
12 May 2016, 09:26 AM
#6
avatar of insaneHoshi

Posts: 911

jump backJump back to quoted post12 May 2016, 09:10 AMKatitof

Since you're talking about dual upgrades here, its 90mun vs 120-140mun.
Not sure what you expected here.


Well consider that they are outclassed at longer ranges by a single allied weapon upgrade. Also having 2 weapons lets them have more DPS by spending marginally more mun. and allows them upgrade more gradually.

But the point of my post was to simply show that PF dont have "everything" like OP assumed.

12 May 2016, 10:20 AM
#7
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



Well consider that they are outclassed at longer ranges by a single allied weapon upgrade. Also having 2 weapons lets them have more DPS by spending marginally more mun. and allows them upgrade more gradually.

But the point of my post was to simply show that PF dont have "everything" like OP assumed.


They are supposed to be outclassed at longer ranges.
They are close to mid range inf with still decent long range dps.
Obviously they won't keep up with LMGs at long range, because they are not lmg squad themselves.

Also, 2 BARs gives you 28 close range DPS and about 10 long range DPS.
PFs G43s give you 30 close range and 6 long range DPS.
Hardly any disparity here considering the cost difference+PFs are getting extra vision on top of it.

And yes, PFs don't have everything, they are amazing inf, my fav axis inf, but they are hardly op, pop cap could be raised to 7 to limit spam, but that is about the only thing I'd change.
12 May 2016, 10:22 AM
#8
avatar of MoerserKarL
Donator 22

Posts: 1108

they are fine :)
12 May 2016, 10:38 AM
#9
avatar of FalseAlarm

Posts: 182

Permanently Banned
lol, they require 90 muni to become even remotely useful against tommes or the bar
12 May 2016, 10:40 AM
#10
avatar of arkpku

Posts: 34

I think the unit is designed to recon for Jadgtigers. Removing sight bonus doesnt make any sense.
12 May 2016, 10:54 AM
#11
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

They only need higher pop. 6 is too low.
12 May 2016, 10:59 AM
#12
avatar of drChengele
Patrion 14

Posts: 640 | Subs: 1

Except they have little received accuracy bonuses.
They are a six man squad. It would be extremely overpowered if they had substantial received accuracy bonuses and it is therefore disingenuous to cite that as their weak point that needs to be offset somehow.
12 May 2016, 12:42 PM
#16
avatar of Myself

Posts: 677

jump backJump back to quoted post12 May 2016, 09:10 AMKatitof
...
Exactly the same as any other snare in game.
...

Same penetration but the least damage making the worse AT grenade in the game, even lower damage than the UKF one, that is actually getting a damage buff other AT grenades levels.

jump backJump back to quoted post12 May 2016, 09:10 AMKatitof
..
Pfussiliers right now are what penals are becoming next patch.
...

Comparing a stock units with a doctrinal units is quite pointless trying to prove Penal are fine by comparing to P.F. is even more pointless.

But I will humor you:

P.F. need to spend 90 munition to come close to Penals.

If you think that Penal are fine and comparable to P.F. lets take the AT grenade from PF (it is quite useless in mode anyway), reduce CP 0, increase cost to 310 and have them come with 3 K98 and 3 G43. Then will see is this will cause any balance issues or not..
12 May 2016, 12:59 PM
#17
avatar of Crumbum

Posts: 213

Popcap should be changed to 8. For a 6 man call in squad to be at only 6 is stupid.
12 May 2016, 13:55 PM
#18
avatar of Kamzil118

Posts: 455

They are fine.
12 May 2016, 14:09 PM
#19
avatar of WhySooSerious

Posts: 1248

pls dont fix what isnt OP Kappa
12 May 2016, 17:54 PM
#20
avatar of Waegukin

Posts: 609

7 pop and they're good to go.
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

394 users are online: 394 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49063
Welcome our newest member, jennifermary
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM