Login

russian armor

Tiger without claws?

PAGES (7)down
13 May 2016, 12:45 PM
#121
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post12 May 2016, 13:47 PMJohnnyB
snippidy snip


I'll go back and address your "gren fragility" argument by enlightening you that we have 5 armies in the game, not 2, Tiger is fighting 5 and 4 men squads just like IS-2 is fighting 5 and 6 men squads.

You might want to get updates on your pirated, 3 year old coh2 copy and know that we don't have soviets vs ost MU exclusively and your infantry fragility based on model count argument goes out of the window.
13 May 2016, 13:19 PM
#122
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post13 May 2016, 12:45 PMKatitof


I'll go back and address your "gren fragility" argument by enlightening you that we have 5 armies in the game, not 2, Tiger is fighting 5 and 4 men squads just like IS-2 is fighting 5 and 6 men squads.



Didn't we talk about Ostheer's Tiger? And about Ostheer's liability? Since when OH has 5 and 6 men squads? The only allied army in the game having 4 men squads core infantry is Brits and by the time Tiger appears we are talking 5 men squads. I think it's something wrong with you COH2 copy, not mine.:loco:
13 May 2016, 13:30 PM
#123
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post13 May 2016, 13:19 PMJohnnyB


Didn't we talk about Ostheer's Tiger? And about Ostheer's liability? Since when OH has 5 and 6 men squads? The only allied army in the game having 4 men squads core infantry is Brits and by the time Tiger appears we are talking 5 men squads. I think it's something wrong with you COH2 copy, not mine.:loco:


Irrelevant.

OKW exists, soviets fight against them too.

USF and UKF exists too, ost Tiger shoots at 4 and 5 man squads as well.

You can't take the part of the game that suits your argument and completely ignore the part that goes against it, because its inconvenient for you.
13 May 2016, 15:59 PM
#124
avatar of Rocket

Posts: 732

jump backJump back to quoted post13 May 2016, 13:30 PMKatitof


Irrelevant.

OKW exists, soviets fight against them too.

USF and UKF exists too, ost Tiger shoots at 4 and 5 man squads as well.

You can't take the part of the game that suits your argument and completely ignore the part that goes against it, because its inconvenient for you.


+1
hahahahhahaha
13 May 2016, 16:10 PM
#125
avatar of Kamzil118

Posts: 455

jump backJump back to quoted post13 May 2016, 13:30 PMKatitof


Irrelevant.

OKW exists, soviets fight against them too.

USF and UKF exists too, ost Tiger shoots at 4 and 5 man squads as well.

You can't take the part of the game that suits your argument and completely ignore the part that goes against it, because its inconvenient for you.
+1
13 May 2016, 19:40 PM
#126
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post13 May 2016, 07:01 AMsinthe
The IS-2 scatter isn't from the drunk driver but the inaccurate 122mm gun that was rushed through production.

And the panther had speed governors to make sure the crew didnt explode the engine yet we have blitz... Accuracy when continent isnt a way to balance the game. Also the scatter is awful because waaay back the is-2 did 240 damage with great aoe and accuracy (read as squad wipe-topia) however it could lose to the ass of a tiger who had to rotate its turret and then shot at the fron of the is-2 (tiger would win with about half health). The GARBAGE pen and dps were changed. Damage was reduced and pen increased... Then it shot faster and wiped squads more... So it was made to never hit anything on the current battlefield and thats how it stayed for many moons.

I personally would like the is-2 to get its damage back and RoF liwered again now that it can hit targets and has the pen to mean a bounce (or miss) doesnt mean 20 seconds of dealing no damage...
13 May 2016, 19:53 PM
#127
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

I personally would like the is-2 to get its damage back and RoF liwered again now that it can hit targets and has the pen to mean a bounce (or miss) doesnt mean 20 seconds of dealing no damage...

I reallllllyyyy wouldn't.

Plz no one-shots
13 May 2016, 20:17 PM
#128
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post13 May 2016, 19:53 PMVuther

I reallllllyyyy wouldn't.

Plz no one-shots

You misunderstand me. It already has the ability to hit things, im mot asking for any more accuracy, just a more unique feel. Kinda like a firefly with aoe.
13 May 2016, 20:34 PM
#129
avatar of FalseAlarm

Posts: 182

Permanently Banned
After using it again I think it is unreliable against inf.


It should have the same scatter/AOE values as the KT, seeing how easily it gets rolfstomped by TD blobs and doesn't have any AT significance, at least it should be a wipe machine.
13 May 2016, 21:05 PM
#130
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1


You misunderstand me. It already has the ability to hit things, im mot asking for any more accuracy, just a more unique feel. Kinda like a firefly with aoe.

But more damage with the same AoE damage fall-off stats would increase the size of the area at which it would deal 80 damage, would it not?
13 May 2016, 22:18 PM
#131
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post13 May 2016, 21:05 PMVuther

But more damage with the same AoE damage fall-off stats would increase the size of the area at which it would deal 80 damage, would it not?

Target tables would be great way to do it I think
Just slow down its RoF and make it deal +80 vs armour (would be cool to deal the 80 on deflect and pen just to make it unique and emphasis how big the gun was)
Because with more accuracy we run the risk of more wipes (cause relic is firm on spacing) I think think slower RoF can prevent that
PAGES (7)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
Today, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
Today, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
Yesterday, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
Yesterday, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
Yesterday, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
Yesterday, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
Yesterday, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
Yesterday, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
Last Thursday, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
Last Thursday, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
Last Thursday, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
Last Thursday, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
Last Thursday, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone do you speak on his behalf? I didn't know. In that case keep us updated please.
18 Mar 2025, 16:47 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

546 users are online: 546 guests
1 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
79 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53168
Welcome our newest member, Oginski
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM