Login

russian armor

su85 feels somewhat nerfed.

11 May 2016, 18:30 PM
#61
avatar of ElSlayer

Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

And what about scatter hits?
12 May 2016, 06:37 AM
#62
avatar of vietnamabc

Posts: 1063


it does a thrilling 160 dmg

Lol so better stick with SU-76 horde for now. When I get a heavy TD, I expect it to hit hard, not tickle heavy like that. M10 with HVAP is better in every way and much cheaper, Jackson can now spot and fire, Firefly gets skill Tulip and blitz from Hammer. Seriously what advantages does the SU-85 got compared with other heavy TD?
12 May 2016, 06:49 AM
#63
avatar of ElSlayer

Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1


Lol so better stick with SU-76 horde for now. When I get a heavy TD, I expect it to hit hard, not tickle heavy like that. M10 with HVAP is better in every way and much cheaper, Jackson can now spot and fire, Firefly gets skill Tulip and blitz from Hammer. Seriously what advantages does the SU-85 got compared with other heavy TD?

Comparing units out of context is wrong. It will lead to mirrored factions if you balance units that way.
SU-85 have advantage in 6-man mainline infantry with snare and ability that buffs speed.
12 May 2016, 07:47 AM
#64
avatar of poop

Posts: 174

yeah... i dont know..

vet 2 SUs really kicked ass, even against heavys.

not sure this is really am improvment,

how is its pen compared to a firefly and such?

maybe give it proper TD damage, its lack of turret makes it difficult enough depending on the map.
12 May 2016, 08:14 AM
#65
avatar of miragefla
Developer Relic Badge

Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13


Lol so better stick with SU-76 horde for now. When I get a heavy TD, I expect it to hit hard, not tickle heavy like that. M10 with HVAP is better in every way and much cheaper, Jackson can now spot and fire, Firefly gets skill Tulip and blitz from Hammer. Seriously what advantages does the SU-85 got compared with other heavy TD?


And the SU-85 has the highest penetration at range and rate of fire of either three stock Allied TDs with one of the Allied TDs relying on an expensive gimmick to get anything done. Furthermore, it probably has the highest survivability against the the main predators of TDs which is ATGs by being the hardest to hit.

It is worse against heavies in terms of the number of shots required to kill, but it's also not as punished for its misses and does better at the range their intended to fight at. Furthermore, it can self-spot which helps it as the Jackson got a massive hit to its self-sighting veterancy in the Balance Preview. Firefly can get a TC for more LOS, but it's also the most expensive TD of the bunch and can still die at the same rate as the SU-85 if not faster.

Penetration
SU-85: 240/230/220

Jackson: 240/220/200

Firefly: 260/240/210

Accuracy

SU-85: 0.055/0.045/0.04 (0.5 Moving)

Jackson: 0.055/0.045/0.035 (0.75 Moving)

Firefly: 0.08/0.07/0.05 (0.75 Moving)

Reload Including Wind-up/Windown

SU-85: 5.4

Jackson: 7.425 (Includes wind-down and wind-up)

Firefly: 10 (8 in Preview)

And people saying that the SU-85 tickles heavies, most games show heavies and tanks will generally back away after receiving 1-2 penetrating shots unless it's an all in or it's chasing a badly wounded unit. And the SU-85 only needs 1 more shots to kill the 1040 and 1280 heavies which by that point, it has already put in another shot thanks to its faster reload. It also penetrates the KT 76% of the time at veterancy 2 with that penetration buff versus 51% of the time with its old penetration.



12 May 2016, 11:26 AM
#66
avatar of vietnamabc

Posts: 1063



And the SU-85 has the highest penetration at range and rate of fire of either three stock Allied TDs with one of the Allied TDs relying on an expensive gimmick to get anything done. Furthermore, it probably has the highest survivability against the the main predators of TDs which is ATGs by being the hardest to hit.

It is worse against heavies in terms of the number of shots required to kill, but it's also not as punished for its misses and does better at the range their intended to fight at. Furthermore, it can self-spot which helps it as the Jackson got a massive hit to its self-sighting veterancy in the Balance Preview. Firefly can get a TC for more LOS, but it's also the most expensive TD of the bunch and can still die at the same rate as the SU-85 if not faster.

Penetration
SU-85: 240/230/220

Jackson: 240/220/200

Firefly: 260/240/210

Accuracy

SU-85: 0.055/0.045/0.04 (0.5 Moving)

Jackson: 0.055/0.045/0.035 (0.75 Moving)

Firefly: 0.08/0.07/0.05 (0.75 Moving)

Reload Including Wind-up/Windown

SU-85: 5.4

Jackson: 7.425 (Includes wind-down and wind-up)

Firefly: 10 (8 in Preview)

And people saying that the SU-85 tickles heavies, most games show heavies and tanks will generally back away after receiving 1-2 penetrating shots unless it's an all in or it's chasing a badly wounded unit. And the SU-85 only needs 1 more shots to kill the 1040 and 1280 heavies which by that point, it has already put in another shot thanks to its faster reload. It also penetrates the KT 76% of the time at veterancy 2 with that penetration buff versus 51% of the time with its old penetration.




Ok so the SU-85 does have its advantages and it needs some time to get used to, it's just that after a long time using Jackson/Firefly, I'm kinda allergic to turretless vehicle that have poor acc (Jackson/Firefly kites Tiger like a champ but SU-85 is more of a ambush type of vehicle). So new SU-85 needs a lot of babysitting compared to before in exchange to more reliable dmg output against heavy tanks.
15 May 2016, 23:21 PM
#67
avatar of frostbite

Posts: 593



And the SU-85 has the highest penetration at range and rate of fire of either three stock Allied TDs with one of the Allied TDs relying on an expensive gimmick to get anything done. Furthermore, it probably has the highest survivability against the the main predators of TDs which is ATGs by being the hardest to hit.

It is worse against heavies in terms of the number of shots required to kill, but it's also not as punished for its misses and does better at the range their intended to fight at. Furthermore, it can self-spot which helps it as the Jackson got a massive hit to its self-sighting veterancy in the Balance Preview. Firefly can get a TC for more LOS, but it's also the most expensive TD of the bunch and can still die at the same rate as the SU-85 if not faster.

Penetration
SU-85: 240/230/220

Jackson: 240/220/200

Firefly: 260/240/210

Accuracy

SU-85: 0.055/0.045/0.04 (0.5 Moving)

Jackson: 0.055/0.045/0.035 (0.75 Moving)

Firefly: 0.08/0.07/0.05 (0.75 Moving)

Reload Including Wind-up/Windown

SU-85: 5.4

Jackson: 7.425 (Includes wind-down and wind-up)

Firefly: 10 (8 in Preview)

And people saying that the SU-85 tickles heavies, most games show heavies and tanks will generally back away after receiving 1-2 penetrating shots unless it's an all in or it's chasing a badly wounded unit. And the SU-85 only needs 1 more shots to kill the 1040 and 1280 heavies which by that point, it has already put in another shot thanks to its faster reload. It also penetrates the KT 76% of the time at veterancy 2 with that penetration buff versus 51% of the time with its old penetration.




su 85 is turetless and slow asf now reloading wats the point of vet2 penetraion chance if it lose all its attack speed. it really need its reload speed back at vet to or nerf all axis vet speed to to make it fair cuz su85 is crapier then i thought it was gona be with tons of testing on the preview. hard to kill tank now while chasing them cus su reloads slow. u hit a corner and get murdered cuz no turret and slow rotation. i think if u would made the su85 vet like 15% pen and 15% ROF would be fine not take all the speed away from only the su85. its turretless its not a jackson or firefly... its need its speed
16 May 2016, 00:40 AM
#68
avatar of poop

Posts: 174

Turreted TDs for slightly more fuel get better damage, better positioning options, more utility.

the disadvantage of not having a turret is not worth self spotting (a job filled by infantry), it has no armor, poor turning, poor accuracy, and shoots the ground if there is any kind of uneven terrain.

as for having 10 more penetration.. whoopty doo.

the Jagpanzer is in the same boat, but at least has 5-stars, cloak, and decent armor.

I hate turretless TDs, they take alot more effort for similar performance. if this games pathing doesn't leave it doing circles.

I can just have 2 FFs, Panthers, Jacksons and just troll around blowing any armor away like a walk in the park, instead of taking my nuts to a cheese-grater to get the toasters on wheels to point the right way. and heaven forbid if the enemy goes around a building or rock.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Osinyagov: Suddenly, coh2 is slowly dying, but you can play it, playerbase still big enough
Last Wednesday, 17:00 PM
Osinyagov: Wow, i remember you from zansi and vali videos, good old memories
Last Wednesday, 16:58 PM
Beinhard: o7 miss this game and zansi
Last Wednesday, 14:09 PM
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
02 Apr 2025, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
01 Apr 2025, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
01 Apr 2025, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM

Livestreams

unknown 5
unknown 3

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

206 users are online: 1 member and 205 guests
henceforthsolutions
0 post in the last 24h
3 posts in the last week
51 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53598
Welcome our newest member, nytwordlehints
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM