Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Correct me if I'm wrong, I believe the range of the Raketen is 50 whereas ZIS is 60, or I'm running off old stats.
Posts: 928
Posts: 34
Posts: 928
I say give the raketen the benefit of light cover or buff its range a wee bit. That just might help it where it needs it.
1 
Posts: 311
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
I say give the raketen the benefit of light cover or buff its range a wee bit. That just might help it where it needs it.
Posts: 571
Agreed, the other AT guns (are supposed to) have heavy cover to compensate for their inability to retreat - well, Raketens can retreat but they can also be suppressed and have 10 less range, so I think it would be fair for them to be a bit hardier against bullets than they are now.
Posts: 928
Agreed, the other AT guns (are supposed to) have heavy cover to compensate for their inability to retreat - well, Raketens can retreat but they can also be suppressed and have 10 less range, so I think it would be fair for them to be a bit hardier against bullets than they are now.
Posts: 1216
Posts: 20
I like the idea, but I would prefer the Panzerjaeger idea be a Volks upgrade in place of Panzerschreck. You still get volks having the AT role, but said AT role is heavily nerfed.
I don't know if that would just encourage volksblob even more though, not unless the damage is so pitiful that you're more likely being AI rather that intended AT (like Guards).
Personally I rather Panzerschreck upgrade be something like needing two HQ trucks deployed. Or even just nerf the damage.
Posts: 728
Except Sovs have an AT gun that can actually penn something and has range.
Plus a plethora of AT vehicles that can scale well into the game, unlike OKW.
Posts: 239
 | Playercard of SHARK | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 34
Posts: 556
It's power against vehicles is fine but it's survivability is a concern. Whats the use of a At gun that cant touch it target before getting blown to smithereens? The benefit of building cover is not always available and unlike other at guns it does not benefit from natural cover of any kind.
Posts: 34
Posts: 400
Another question how much manpower and pop does the raketen take up compared to the other at guns? Anybody have any specific stats to show me please?
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Another question how much manpower and pop does the raketen take up compared to the other at guns? Anybody have any specific stats to show me please?
Posts: 34
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
It's a good idea, but I have no faith in Relic adding a new squad for free. They are experimenting with the USF mortar, but that is already in the game in Ardennes Assault. Too much work for it I fear.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
USF 57mm 270 MP 7 pop.
OKW Raketen 270 MP 7 pop.
Wehr Pak40 320 MP 9 pop.
UKF 6 Pounder 320 MP 7 pop.
SU ZiS-3 320 MP 9 pop.
Speaking of which, goddammit WHY does the 6 Pounder cost 2 less pop than comparable ATGs?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
 |
|
|
29 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
