Login

russian armor

British command vehicle maphack

18 Mar 2016, 21:43 PM
#21
avatar of |GB| The Hooligan486
Senior Referee Badge

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Mar 2016, 20:28 PMSlyzor


It is just how it goes. 222 is good but still it is a scout car that you can lose really quickly. And having 222 just on the plane destroying duty is kinda lame.



I don't want to build a queen just to counter a pawn.

222 is cheap :foreveralone:
And if you don't want to make a 222 to counter the abilitiy, well then you should actually stop complaining about this "OP" ability :D
18 Mar 2016, 22:44 PM
#22
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

Doesnt the 222 cost less per unit than allied grenade research...
nee
18 Mar 2016, 23:10 PM
#23
avatar of nee

Posts: 1216

Yeah considering it's FREE recon loiter, reducing it to single strafe (and perhaps lowering cooldown) would at least reduce the engine noise spam.
18 Mar 2016, 23:22 PM
#24
avatar of Spinflight

Posts: 680

Not sure how much but the recon plane gives plenty of xp I seem to recall.

So, free xp for your 222, Ostwind etc and you are complaining. With 2 scout cars on the field they don't last 10 seconds, same with any AAA. It is a direct counter, and rather an obvious one.

As for the 222 being a Queen, jeez, it is one of the cheapest units in the game.

Since arty cover has been nerfed to the ground due to Axis moaning it isn't as though there is anything else of much use in the doctrine. Resupply can be situationally useful but Brits need all of the munitions they can get and it is pricey. Same with all the other abilities. 450 Manpower for 420 manpower's worth of Engineers, a very expensive OP with very expensive abilities that dies quicker than an emplacement...

Compare and contrast the command tanks to the command vehicle. The former buff themselves, the latter nerfs itself into beyond uselessness.
19 Mar 2016, 05:28 AM
#25
avatar of Slyzor

Posts: 51


As for the 222 being a Queen, jeez, it is one of the cheapest units in the game.


I was referring to Ostwind as a queen. Anyways I had a problem with a command vehicle (UC) in the game where brit built bofors in the middle and 2 mortar pits after that. He used command vehicle to spot for his mortars so my mortars (I had 2) had no chance against them. When I got p4 I tried to rush the base but he already had 2 AT guns. Obviously I couldn't rush the UC with 222 because it was protected by bofors. I guess I could have built 222 just for killing planes but I didn't consider this option (and I mean he would got some scout information from planes anyways, right?).
19 Mar 2016, 08:13 AM
#26
avatar of adamírcz

Posts: 957

Maybe it deserves the nerf, but if it does, so does the OKW infrared halftrack.
And where did you get that it is free? You need to pay 210MP and 75 ammo to get it.
19 Mar 2016, 09:25 AM
#27
avatar of Slyzor

Posts: 51

Maybe it deserves the nerf, but if it does, so does the OKW infrared halftrack.
And where did you get that it is free? You need to pay 210MP and 75 ammo to get it.


IR halftrack is more vulnerable because it requires to stay in one place.
The upgrade isn't free but it is cheap for what it does and scout places are free. And don't forget about the aura of command vehicle.
19 Mar 2016, 10:49 AM
#28
avatar of tightrope
Senior Caster Badge
Patrion 39

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 29

It is a bit too strong. Maybe adding a small munitions cost to it or making it a pass rather than a loiter as other have suggested would be good.
19 Mar 2016, 11:49 AM
#29
avatar of Shanka

Posts: 323

It should have a munition cost and add 30 sec to cooldown, in combination with mortar pit spam it's impossible to get a flank on them
19 Mar 2016, 12:07 PM
#30
avatar of Brick Top

Posts: 1168

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Mar 2016, 20:28 PMSlyzor

having 222 just on the plane destroying duty is kinda lame.



Well its not that bad considering they have had to relegate a Bren carrier or AEC to command vehicle, so they also have one light vehicle less in the action.

You can still use your 222 to push off capping squads on flanks, or deep inf pushes.
19 Mar 2016, 12:10 PM
#31
avatar of tenid

Posts: 232

If you want to give the recon plane an additional muni cost, then you'd have to remove the speed self-nerf from the command vehicle.
19 Mar 2016, 13:09 PM
#32
avatar of Spinflight

Posts: 680

UC command vehicle costs 210 plus 75 munitions, counter costs 210MP and gets free Vet. Command vehicle has to sit in base due to the nerfs whilst 222 is a damned useful unit.

This commander has already been nerfed into the ground.
19 Mar 2016, 14:03 PM
#33
avatar of PencilBatRation

Posts: 794

If you can't chase down and kill a light car then you should start playing crash bandicoot or something, this game is not for you obviously.
19 Mar 2016, 14:07 PM
#34
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

How about 30sec recon and 60sec cooldown?
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
Last Wednesday, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
Last Wednesday, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
Last Tuesday, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
Last Tuesday, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
Last Tuesday, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM

Livestreams

Australia 73
Peru 19
unknown 1
United Kingdom 28
United States 18

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

588 users are online: 588 guests
3 posts in the last 24h
14 posts in the last week
74 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53277
Welcome our newest member, Infest
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM