Login

russian armor

222 Price needs to be looked at..

13 Mar 2016, 14:31 PM
#1
avatar of Spinflight

Posts: 680

Watching Dusty getting wrecked in the NA ESL by a 666 just brought home my experiences in game with regard to the 222.

Brits have 4 counters.

The AEC now costs 60 fuel, and 75 include the unlock. It is very hard countered by double 222s for significantly less. The in game role of the AEC is to counter opposition light vehicles, yet is itself hard countered by massively cheaper light vehicles. Haven't experienced it myself but there is a suggestion that a well microed 222 can solo an AEC due to the slow turret rotation of the AEC.

Brit sniper has a role to play against light vehicles, though with equal sight range the bald Scottish dude doesn't in my expereince, stand a chance. Even surviving the retreat leads to the 222 base rape, which the Brit machine gun nests are unable to counter.

Piats. Lets not go there!

6 pounder. Can be reasonably effective if backing up an AEC, though 75 fuel and 600 MP for a point defence is not much use against the 222s mobility. Alone a 6 pounder is easily decrewed by a 222, might get a single shot off. Used in conjunction with an AEC massively limits the AEC's mobility, as if it chases, dives or merely wanders outside the effective use of a 6 pounder it dies easily and quickly to 2 x 222s.

Mines aren't really a counter as AEC plus 6 pounder is almost a requirement, hence building engineers and laying them is both luck orientated and happens too late for the vulnerable engineers to lay them in time.
13 Mar 2016, 14:38 PM
#2
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

Yeah, it's not really that 222s are uncountable. but they are way too accessible.

I can buy 3 222s to counter a allied light vehicle. Completely screw up and lose all of them, but still beat my opponent to medium armor given similar fuel.
13 Mar 2016, 14:42 PM
#3
avatar of Spinflight

Posts: 680

Please note that I'm in no way against Ostheer having a useful light vehicle, when I capture one I rather enjoy the 222 myself!

With all of the Brits possible counters at T2 however there is a huge problem with getting the relevant units out on the field before being swarmed. IS in trenches do provide a speedbump, but can simply be bypassed, manpower limitations and tier locking clearly prevent a useful defence.

13 Mar 2016, 15:00 PM
#4
avatar of Danielstaleiny

Posts: 35

okey, this is comparison to ukf, but what about usf and soviet ? .. soviet can get quad truck just after I can get scout car, and so on.

Take all factions to consideration. Thanks :)
13 Mar 2016, 15:36 PM
#5
avatar of Putinist

Posts: 175

okey, this is comparison to ukf, but what about usf and soviet ? .. soviet can get quad truck just after I can get scout car, and so on.


Not really accurate. It can come a couple of minutes later if soviet player is going t1 and ignores AT-nades. Those few minutes would be crucial for the 222 as there is no real counters to it with that build order. Realistically, the quad arrives considerably later.

I dunno about usf, but I can speculate that zooks and early LV makes countering 222 easier.
13 Mar 2016, 15:56 PM
#6
avatar of bingo12345

Posts: 304

230 20 -> 210 15 ninja change recently. this is maybe a bug not a balance problem.
13 Mar 2016, 16:39 PM
#7
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

222 vs USF issue is related to Ammo usage. Yes Zook counter 222 but while you equip 2 zooks on your RE, your opponent just equip 2 LMGs. And then again, 2 Zooks don't do anything vs 2 222. And to not forget that going USF t1/M20 cost you a supplement of ammo for the skirts.
13 Mar 2016, 16:50 PM
#8
avatar of Tobis
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4

Fuel cost is obviously too cheap. Compare the scout car to the m3 or the jeep, same fuel price. Needs to be 25, imo.
13 Mar 2016, 16:52 PM
#9
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

I think it should cost 20 fuel and 280 MP.
13 Mar 2016, 16:54 PM
#10
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 16:50 PMTobis
Fuel cost is obviously too cheap. Compare the scout car to the m3 or the jeep, same fuel price. Needs to be 25, imo.


Actually, WC51 is 25% more expensive while not being able to do anything on its own.
13 Mar 2016, 16:58 PM
#11
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 16:54 PMKatitof


Actually, WC51 is 25% more expensive while not being able to do anything on its own.


It has self repair, can cap, and can be given to other players.

IMO the above + its timing make it a high risk/high reward early shock AND harass unit.
13 Mar 2016, 17:07 PM
#12
avatar of Pablonano

Posts: 297



It has self repair, can cap, and can be given to other players.

IMO the above + its timing make it a high risk/high reward early shock AND harass unit.

Those are just USF things and not just based on the unit itself. And after the bren carrier changue i cant find a reason about why it shouldnt be fuel-less aswell
13 Mar 2016, 17:08 PM
#13
avatar of JohnSmith

Posts: 1273

I'm not sure if "given to other player" is considered as an advantage though. Isn't decrewing and repair USF the faction's advantage? Well, I know that Relic is screwing consistency recently though..
13 Mar 2016, 17:14 PM
#14
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1



It has self repair, can cap, and can be given to other players.

IMO the above + its timing make it a high risk/high reward early shock AND harass unit.


I can't self-repair, can't cap (you have to unload your troop/crew and they cap) and being given to other player is something I barely see any usage for tanks, so for a WC51... Vet1 ability is a speed increase for 10 seconds.

Pro: can load riflemen and they can shoot from it
Con: no armor, dead in one raken/pak shot and almost dead from any faust/shreck shot. 240mp/20fuel, has 0 chance to survive vs a 222.
13 Mar 2016, 17:17 PM
#15
avatar of Bananenheld

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

Watching Dusty getting wrecked in the NA ESL

>watching NA
13 Mar 2016, 17:38 PM
#16
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 17:14 PMEsxile


I can't self-repair, can't cap (you have to unload your troop/crew and they cap) and being given to other player is something I barely see any usage for tanks, so for a WC51... Vet1 ability is a speed increase for 10 seconds.


None of it is WC51 trait, these are all general USF traits.

Pro: can load riflemen and they can shoot from it
Con: no armor, dead in one raken/pak shot and almost dead from any faust/shreck shot. 240mp/20fuel, has 0 chance to survive vs a 222.


That pro is also a con, because without these rifles inside its useless, which also makes the "cap" argument irrelevant, because its not meant or even possible to use it without supporting infantry squad, just like M3, yet M3 is cheaper and stronger.
13 Mar 2016, 17:43 PM
#17
avatar of Thamor

Posts: 290

It's t0 unit which gives USF access to fast movement across map with it's strong riflemen, can drive past mg42 fire without getting suppression...

Stupid to compare it to 222. WC51 is fine, use it or not. If 222 is problem use bazookas, slow repair and micro to even keep engineers with 222 make it out of combat for a lot longer times than USF vehicles with self repair.

Keep the posting on AEC/Stuart vs 222.

ps. WC51 vs Kubbel...aren't u talking about that at all? :)
13 Mar 2016, 18:12 PM
#18
avatar of VenstreDjevel

Posts: 55

222 being op currently distracts from the fact that a lot of axis is pretty meh atm, it will get nerfed just like aec got nerfed but where will ostheer go from there?
13 Mar 2016, 18:20 PM
#19
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

222 being op currently distracts from the fact that a lot of axis is pretty meh atm, it will get nerfed just like aec got nerfed but where will ostheer go from there?
meh is fine. meh means it's working and can be useful. There are a ton of allied units and abilities that they wish were atleast meh.
13 Mar 2016, 18:27 PM
#20
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 17:38 PMKatitof


None of it is WC51 trait, these are all general USF traits.



That pro is also a con, because without these rifles inside its useless, which also makes the "cap" argument irrelevant, because its not meant or even possible to use it without supporting infantry squad, just like M3, yet M3 is cheaper and stronger.


Those are general USF traits, but in the form of a super early vehicle which means there's less oppurtunity cost due to no loss in capping through self cap and repair. There's also withdraw and refit in the commander.

If you want an argument for buffing the unit, I think that the generally mediocre Mechanized Company is one
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

New Zealand 17

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

893 users are online: 893 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49131
Welcome our newest member, Mcwowell05
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM