Login

russian armor

2 unseen commanders left from old leaks

10 Mar 2016, 14:18 PM
#1
10 Mar 2016, 14:25 PM
#2
avatar of Osinyagov
Senior Modmaker Badge

Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1

This soviet face will be more suitable for Armored doctrine (T-34-85 and IS-2). Btw i hope i will be one day released and show the true soviet power! :foreveralone:
10 Mar 2016, 14:28 PM
#3
avatar of Adviser

Posts: 53

This soviet face will be more suitable for Armored doctrine (T-34-85 and IS-2). Btw i hope i will be one day released and show the true soviet power! :foreveralone:

SU-100? :foreveralone:
10 Mar 2016, 14:28 PM
#4
avatar of Rekkettenn

Posts: 76

This soviet face will be more suitable for Armored doctrine (T-34-85 and IS-2). Btw i hope i will be one day released and show the true soviet power! :foreveralone:


i hope for soviet commander with su76 ace and maybe american commander with pershing ace battlegroup?
10 Mar 2016, 14:30 PM
#5
avatar of Rekkettenn

Posts: 76

or ability for soviets like
"stolen Tiger ace tank" must be repaired every 2 minutes because it has damaged tracks.
10 Mar 2016, 14:31 PM
#6
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

I'd like new toys for sov and ost :foreveralone:

Lelik pls :foreveralone:
10 Mar 2016, 14:39 PM
#7
avatar of tenid

Posts: 232

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Mar 2016, 14:31 PMKatitof
I'd like new toys for sov and ost :foreveralone:

Lelik pls :foreveralone:


Just curious, but do Sov and Ost have generic armour lines? Most of their lines seem self-referential ("T-34 reporting" etc). I suppose they could probably cobble something together from the other lines though.
10 Mar 2016, 15:27 PM
#8
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned
I hope its be soviet doc with m3 Lee tanks MVGame.
10 Mar 2016, 15:34 PM
#9
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

I hope its be soviet doc with m3 Lee tanks MVGame.

Yes, we definitely need more inferior, irrelevant units that had a hard time against P4s, T34 definitely isn't that low yet :snfBarton:
10 Mar 2016, 15:42 PM
#10
avatar of MoreLess3rd

Posts: 363

i think i seen that commander somewhere b4..the SOV looking, its has something to do with T34 can mount a COns or Guard,

the rest of the Ability i cant remember..or was it a fan made..
10 Mar 2016, 15:42 PM
#11
avatar of vietnamabc

Posts: 1063

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Mar 2016, 15:34 PMKatitof

Yes, we definitely need more inferior, irrelevant units that had a hard time against P4s, T34 definitely isn't that low yet :snfBarton:

Well at least we haven't got to use the campaign Zis truck to transport conscript around.
10 Mar 2016, 15:51 PM
#12
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8


Well at least we haven't got to use the campaign Zis truck to transport conscript around.

That actually wouldn't be half bad.

8 models can shoot out of it and it can reinforce.
Would actually make a lot of sense for defensive doctrine given its packed with weapon teams.
10 Mar 2016, 15:55 PM
#13
avatar of Swift

Posts: 2723 | Subs: 1

That American commander has done the impossible by being uglier than the Urban Defense commander. He looks like his skull is trying to push out from his skin.
10 Mar 2016, 15:57 PM
#14
avatar of vietnamabc

Posts: 1063

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Mar 2016, 15:51 PMKatitof

That actually wouldn't be half bad.

8 models can shoot out of it and it can reinforce.
Would actually make a lot of sense for defensive doctrine given its packed with weapon teams.

Yeah it would give people actual reason to use defensive doctrine other than trolling Axis player.
10 Mar 2016, 15:57 PM
#15
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Mar 2016, 14:39 PMtenid


Just curious, but do Sov and Ost have generic armour lines? Most of their lines seem self-referential ("T-34 reporting" etc). I suppose they could probably cobble something together from the other lines though.


Every faction does that. They use those line when you capture an abandoned enemy vehicle. Like capturing a T34 with ost. They only use generic voice lines.

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Mar 2016, 15:55 PMSwift
That American commander has done the impossible and by being uglier than the Urban Defense commander. He looks like his skull is trying to push out from his skin.


Which is realistic. Most commanders look like Hollywood models :hansGASM::hansGASM::hansGASM:
10 Mar 2016, 16:13 PM
#16
avatar of UlyssesBellefonte

Posts: 40

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Mar 2016, 15:34 PMKatitof

Yes, we definitely need more inferior, irrelevant units that had a hard time against P4s, T34 definitely isn't that low yet :snfBarton:


give us the m24 chaffee!
10 Mar 2016, 16:13 PM
#17
avatar of Tobis
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4

I don't see a German commander that could have Hotchkiss, but I can still hope.
10 Mar 2016, 16:20 PM
#18
avatar of Tiger Baron

Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

Wasn't that the planned American defensive company commander? Or so I heard at least, and I think the Soviet one was from Tank Desant? The one with the riding infantry on tanks and stuff, that was cool looking.
10 Mar 2016, 17:00 PM
#19
10 Mar 2016, 17:02 PM
#20
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Mar 2016, 16:13 PMTobis
I don't see a German commander that could have Hotchkiss, but I can still hope.

Never give up, never surrender
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

785 users are online: 785 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49065
Welcome our newest member, Huhmpal01
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM