My system!
Memory: 4GB RAM
Processor: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor,
Overclocked to 3.7ghz, quad core.
Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 5800 Series 1024mb
OS: 64bit windows10
Hard Drive:
Drive 1
Size 128.0 GB
Free 70.2 GB
Drive 2
Size 337.8 GB
Free 67.0 GB
Playing on an HDMI linked new 40" Samsung TV in 1920 x 1080!
Please Help!
Why I cant play COH 2 on the highestt graphic settings?
15 Feb 2016, 14:12 PM
#1
Posts: 5
15 Feb 2016, 14:18 PM
#2
6 Posts: 328
Sadly the game is poorly (if at all) optimised. So even if you had an unlimited budget and created a rig with all the best components currently available, the game would still run very badly relative to the pc running it.
People have been asking Relic to optimise the game for ages (before WA came out it ran much better), but so far nothing :-(
People have been asking Relic to optimise the game for ages (before WA came out it ran much better), but so far nothing :-(
15 Feb 2016, 14:18 PM
#3
Posts: 393
Pretty sure not even a 980GTX Titan can run this game on max settings 60 FPS.
The only reason COH2 is still around, is because it's preserved by salt.
15 Feb 2016, 14:19 PM
#4
4 Posts: 73
You cant your gfx, is not good enough. You can test it out in game... Under gfx options... Play with settings and see how high you can get it, before it ruins the game for you
15 Feb 2016, 14:23 PM
#5
Posts: 5
Well at least run it on better settings, these are the max settings i can run with very minimal lag,
Image Quality - Meduim
AA - Off
V Sync - On
Texture - Meduim
Snow - Low
Physics - Meduim
Image Quality - Meduim
AA - Off
V Sync - On
Texture - Meduim
Snow - Low
Physics - Meduim
15 Feb 2016, 14:25 PM
#6
Posts: 5
Above is as high as i can play smoothly with them settings. Is it just my Graphics card which is preventing running it smoothly on higher settings?
15 Feb 2016, 14:38 PM
#7
Posts: 17
Pretty sure not even a 980GTX Titan can run this game on max settings 60 FPS.
I have the 980 GTX Titan, and you're right, it can't.
It runs pretty good, mostly on 60 FPS, but not when the hard fight starts.
15 Feb 2016, 14:43 PM
#8
Posts: 5
Can anyone upload thier rig that can run on meduim AA, with all other settings high? or low AA with all other settings high?
15 Feb 2016, 14:56 PM
#9
92 
Posts: 374
You need at least 16 gb of ram to run this nicely on max.
also it's more optimized for nvidia cards over AMD
that being said it also runs better on Intel.
i have a 970ti
16 gigs
3.5 ghz intel i7.
and a 250gb solidstate
and a 1tb storage on the side for when i need to move games from my SSD to that.
also it's more optimized for nvidia cards over AMD
that being said it also runs better on Intel.
i have a 970ti
16 gigs
3.5 ghz intel i7.
and a 250gb solidstate
and a 1tb storage on the side for when i need to move games from my SSD to that.
15 Feb 2016, 15:06 PM
#10
Posts: 640
There's probably no graphics card that can run CoH 2 well in today's standards.
15 Feb 2016, 15:13 PM
#11
5 Posts: 243
NASA tried to run 4v4 CoH2 with MAX settings one time, crashed their system, satellite blast into space!
So never try
So never try
15 Feb 2016, 19:41 PM
#12
1 
Posts: 453
I own the Amd 965 black edition overclocked to 4.0 ghz and the game still runs relatively slow (with a Ati 7970 gpu). I'm thinking the architecture of that particular processor and the combination of the rams speed hinders the performance.
15 Feb 2016, 21:45 PM
#13
Posts: 498
AMD FX 9370 (4,4 8-core)
MSI GTX 970 4GB
16 GB DDR3 RAM
Medium/High settings (AA off) and I can play 1v1s and 2v2s with the fps dropping to 40 in the largest fights, otherwise runs pretty well
You can't really play this game on max settings without spending 5000€ on your system
MSI GTX 970 4GB
16 GB DDR3 RAM
Medium/High settings (AA off) and I can play 1v1s and 2v2s with the fps dropping to 40 in the largest fights, otherwise runs pretty well
You can't really play this game on max settings without spending 5000€ on your system
www.twitch.tv/rawv1 
usf 
okw 
soviets 
ostheer
"Lefh is love, Lefh is life" Festung Support for the winFI
In game know as Törttö ᶠᶸᶜᵏᵧₒᵤ
Best rank 1v1 - 33 Soviets, 2v2 - 1 Ostheer RT
usf okw soviets ostheer"Lefh is love, Lefh is life" Festung Support for the win
FIIn game know as Törttö ᶠᶸᶜᵏᵧₒᵤ
Best rank 1v1 - 33 Soviets, 2v2 - 1 Ostheer RT
15 Feb 2016, 21:54 PM
#14
1 
Posts: 2885
AMD FX 9370 (4,4 8-core)
MSI GTX 970 4GB
16 GB DDR3 RAM
Medium/High settings (AA off) and I can play 1v1s and 2v2s with the fps dropping to 40 in the largest fights, otherwise runs pretty well
You can't really play this game on max settings without spending 5000€ on your system
You actually can, but not if you expect 60fps. I still dont really get what is the difference in player performance between 30 and 60fps. I mean I understand it looks better but its not like 10fps that makes it harder to issue orders or something.
15 Feb 2016, 22:09 PM
#15
Posts: 86
Also, CoH2 does not support 144hz monitors, what a surprise. 
I recommend to turn down anti aliasing BTW.
I recommend to turn down anti aliasing BTW.
15 Feb 2016, 22:33 PM
#16
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
I was once able to play CoH2 on max settings without any issue until Brits and the WFAs waere released. 
Need an optimization patch pretty badly
Need an optimization patch pretty badly
15 Feb 2016, 22:58 PM
#17
6 Posts: 328
'Once I fiddled around a bit I managed to get it looking good and running well on a GTX670/i5-2500k. If I max everything to the max I only get 26fps on the benchmark which is pretty crazy.' - that's a forum post from 2 years and 7 months ago (http://goo.gl/mmM6F7).
Skip forward to today and I get 30fps on the benchmark and I have a GTX960/AMD A10-5800k, and that isn't even with everything maxed out.
It seems the best way to get this game to run well is to go back in time.
If they ever do fix war spoils, we'll have to all try and make sure the next 'big' thing the community moans about is the need for optimisation.
Skip forward to today and I get 30fps on the benchmark and I have a GTX960/AMD A10-5800k, and that isn't even with everything maxed out.
It seems the best way to get this game to run well is to go back in time.
If they ever do fix war spoils, we'll have to all try and make sure the next 'big' thing the community moans about is the need for optimisation.
18 Feb 2016, 15:14 PM
#18
Posts: 1467 | Subs: 4
'Once I fiddled around a bit I managed to get it looking good and running well on a GTX670/i5-2500k. If I max everything to the max I only get 26fps on the benchmark which is pretty crazy.' - that's a forum post from 2 years and 7 months ago (http://goo.gl/mmM6F7).
Skip forward to today and I get 30fps on the benchmark and I have a GTX960/AMD A10-5800k, and that isn't even with everything maxed out.
It seems the best way to get this game to run well is to go back in time.
If they ever do fix war spoils, we'll have to all try and make sure the next 'big' thing the community moans about is the need for optimisation.
I don't understand how it isn't the big thing... that is why I left years ago. I was so disappointed with the game and how it ran, and still nothing has changed. If THQ was around this wouldn't have happened.
Seriously though, by it not being optimized it turns a lot of people away cause they load up the game, get the lowest settings. They are basically playing with legos the entire time because everything looks so bad.
18 Feb 2016, 15:41 PM
#19
Posts: 88
BannedPretty sure not even a 980GTX Titan can run this game on max settings 60 FPS.
It can, I'm the living proof
!But ofc, the 60 FPS are not stable after a few games (thanks Mem'leak)
I don't understand how it isn't the big thing... that is why I left years ago. I was so disappointed with the game and how it ran, and still nothing has changed. If THQ was around this wouldn't have happened.
Seriously though, by it not being optimized it turns a lot of people away cause they load up the game, get the lowest settings. They are basically playing with legos the entire time because everything looks so bad.
+1.
19 Feb 2016, 18:39 PM
#20
3 Posts: 322
To do that you need intel i5, more ram, and a better gfx card. So new computer.
My 2011 tech runs it fine near highest, so I don't find the demands unreasonable.
No AA though (really don't like AA)
My 2011 tech runs it fine near highest, so I don't find the demands unreasonable.
No AA though (really don't like AA)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
44 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.618222.736+3
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
819 users are online:
819 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49140
Welcome our newest member, Drummer
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Drummer
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM