Login

russian armor

Why I cant play COH 2 on the highestt graphic settings?

15 Feb 2016, 14:12 PM
#1
avatar of Redfury

Posts: 5

My system!

Memory: 4GB RAM

Processor: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor,
Overclocked to 3.7ghz, quad core.

Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 5800 Series 1024mb

OS: 64bit windows10

Hard Drive:

Drive 1
Size 128.0 GB
Free 70.2 GB
Drive 2
Size 337.8 GB
Free 67.0 GB


Playing on an HDMI linked new 40" Samsung TV in 1920 x 1080!

Please Help!
15 Feb 2016, 14:18 PM
#2
avatar of MrBananaGrabber.
Patrion 26

Posts: 328

Sadly the game is poorly (if at all) optimised. So even if you had an unlimited budget and created a rig with all the best components currently available, the game would still run very badly relative to the pc running it.

People have been asking Relic to optimise the game for ages (before WA came out it ran much better), but so far nothing :-(
15 Feb 2016, 14:18 PM
#3
avatar of Obersoldat

Posts: 393

Pretty sure not even a 980GTX Titan can run this game on max settings 60 FPS.
15 Feb 2016, 14:19 PM
#4
avatar of oakdk
Patrion 14

Posts: 73

You cant your gfx, is not good enough. You can test it out in game... Under gfx options... Play with settings and see how high you can get it, before it ruins the game for you
15 Feb 2016, 14:23 PM
#5
avatar of Redfury

Posts: 5

Well at least run it on better settings, these are the max settings i can run with very minimal lag,

Image Quality - Meduim
AA - Off
V Sync - On
Texture - Meduim
Snow - Low
Physics - Meduim
15 Feb 2016, 14:25 PM
#6
avatar of Redfury

Posts: 5

Above is as high as i can play smoothly with them settings. Is it just my Graphics card which is preventing running it smoothly on higher settings?
15 Feb 2016, 14:38 PM
#7
avatar of Zombie.K

Posts: 17

Pretty sure not even a 980GTX Titan can run this game on max settings 60 FPS.


I have the 980 GTX Titan, and you're right, it can't. :thumbsup:

It runs pretty good, mostly on 60 FPS, but not when the hard fight starts.
15 Feb 2016, 14:43 PM
#8
avatar of Redfury

Posts: 5

Can anyone upload thier rig that can run on meduim AA, with all other settings high? or low AA with all other settings high?
15 Feb 2016, 14:56 PM
#9
avatar of dreamerdude
Benefactor 392

Posts: 374

You need at least 16 gb of ram to run this nicely on max.
also it's more optimized for nvidia cards over AMD
that being said it also runs better on Intel.

i have a 970ti
16 gigs
3.5 ghz intel i7.
and a 250gb solidstate

and a 1tb storage on the side for when i need to move games from my SSD to that.
15 Feb 2016, 15:06 PM
#10
avatar of TNrg

Posts: 640

There's probably no graphics card that can run CoH 2 well in today's standards.
15 Feb 2016, 15:13 PM
#11
avatar of ruzen
Patrion 15

Posts: 243

NASA tried to run 4v4 CoH2 with MAX settings one time, crashed their system, satellite blast into space!
So never try :luvDerp:
15 Feb 2016, 19:41 PM
#12
avatar of OuTLaWSTaR
Donator 11

Posts: 453

I own the Amd 965 black edition overclocked to 4.0 ghz and the game still runs relatively slow (with a Ati 7970 gpu). I'm thinking the architecture of that particular processor and the combination of the rams speed hinders the performance.
15 Feb 2016, 21:45 PM
#13
avatar of Plaguer

Posts: 498

AMD FX 9370 (4,4 8-core)
MSI GTX 970 4GB
16 GB DDR3 RAM

Medium/High settings (AA off) and I can play 1v1s and 2v2s with the fps dropping to 40 in the largest fights, otherwise runs pretty well

You can't really play this game on max settings without spending 5000€ on your system :snfPeter:
15 Feb 2016, 21:54 PM
#14
avatar of ferwiner
Donator 11

Posts: 2885

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Feb 2016, 21:45 PMPlaguer
AMD FX 9370 (4,4 8-core)
MSI GTX 970 4GB
16 GB DDR3 RAM

Medium/High settings (AA off) and I can play 1v1s and 2v2s with the fps dropping to 40 in the largest fights, otherwise runs pretty well

You can't really play this game on max settings without spending 5000€ on your system :snfPeter:


You actually can, but not if you expect 60fps. I still dont really get what is the difference in player performance between 30 and 60fps. I mean I understand it looks better but its not like 10fps that makes it harder to issue orders or something.
15 Feb 2016, 22:09 PM
#15
avatar of Waspaloy

Posts: 86

Also, CoH2 does not support 144hz monitors, what a surprise. :romeoPls:

I recommend to turn down anti aliasing BTW.

15 Feb 2016, 22:33 PM
#16
avatar of VonIvan

Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21

I was once able to play CoH2 on max settings without any issue until Brits and the WFAs waere released. :foreveralone:
Need an optimization patch pretty badly :foreveralone:
15 Feb 2016, 22:58 PM
#17
avatar of MrBananaGrabber.
Patrion 26

Posts: 328

'Once I fiddled around a bit I managed to get it looking good and running well on a GTX670/i5-2500k. If I max everything to the max I only get 26fps on the benchmark which is pretty crazy.' - that's a forum post from 2 years and 7 months ago (http://goo.gl/mmM6F7).

Skip forward to today and I get 30fps on the benchmark and I have a GTX960/AMD A10-5800k, and that isn't even with everything maxed out.

It seems the best way to get this game to run well is to go back in time.
If they ever do fix war spoils, we'll have to all try and make sure the next 'big' thing the community moans about is the need for optimisation.
18 Feb 2016, 15:14 PM
#18
avatar of Tric
Master Mapmaker Badge

Posts: 1467 | Subs: 4

'Once I fiddled around a bit I managed to get it looking good and running well on a GTX670/i5-2500k. If I max everything to the max I only get 26fps on the benchmark which is pretty crazy.' - that's a forum post from 2 years and 7 months ago (http://goo.gl/mmM6F7).

Skip forward to today and I get 30fps on the benchmark and I have a GTX960/AMD A10-5800k, and that isn't even with everything maxed out.

It seems the best way to get this game to run well is to go back in time.
If they ever do fix war spoils, we'll have to all try and make sure the next 'big' thing the community moans about is the need for optimisation.


I don't understand how it isn't the big thing... that is why I left years ago. I was so disappointed with the game and how it ran, and still nothing has changed. If THQ was around this wouldn't have happened. :P

Seriously though, by it not being optimized it turns a lot of people away cause they load up the game, get the lowest settings. They are basically playing with legos the entire time because everything looks so bad.
18 Feb 2016, 15:41 PM
#19
avatar of TEKOA

Posts: 88

Banned
Pretty sure not even a 980GTX Titan can run this game on max settings 60 FPS.


It can, I'm the living proof :) !
But ofc, the 60 FPS are not stable after a few games (thanks Mem'leak)

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Feb 2016, 15:14 PMTric


I don't understand how it isn't the big thing... that is why I left years ago. I was so disappointed with the game and how it ran, and still nothing has changed. If THQ was around this wouldn't have happened. :P

Seriously though, by it not being optimized it turns a lot of people away cause they load up the game, get the lowest settings. They are basically playing with legos the entire time because everything looks so bad.


+1.
19 Feb 2016, 18:39 PM
#20
avatar of _underscore
Donator 33

Posts: 322

To do that you need intel i5, more ram, and a better gfx card. So new computer.

My 2011 tech runs it fine near highest, so I don't find the demands unreasonable.
No AA though (really don't like AA)
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 9
United States 2
United States 2

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

839 users are online: 839 guests
3 posts in the last 24h
4 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48723
Welcome our newest member, zowinfans
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM