Calliope and Teching
Posts: 61
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
It doesn't replace stock, weaker calliope like you know, ez8 and T34/85 do.
Posts: 281
Posts: 1273
Posts: 61
Why?
It doesn't replace stock, weaker calliope like you know, ez8 and T34/85 do.
First, it would put it in line with most factions where rocket artillery is tier locked.
Second, it would avoid USF just rushing to it while Ostheer and OKW are still using infantry and waiting for tanks.
Third, (and this one is the least important) it paralells with stock, being a sherman variant, though the m10 and the bulldozer might get away with it unless they get a unexpected buff to their original aim (AT and AI/AB respectively)
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
First, it would put it in line with most factions where rocket artillery is tier locked.
Most factions rocket artilery is not doctrine locked already.
Second, it would avoid USF just rushing to it while Ostheer and OKW are still using infantry and waiting for tanks.
USF rushing what?
You can have sherman well before you can call-in calli.
If anything, calli would arrive about 5 minutes FASTER and by the time the first comes out now, there would be 2 now.
Third, (and this one is the least important) it paralells with stock, being a sherman variant, though the m10 and the bulldozer might get away with it unless they get a unexpected buff to their original aim (AT and AI/AB respectively)
Puma, MHT, 250, StuG-E, M5, M3, suxton, priest.
Explain them then.
It doesn't parallels with anything, its completely different unit with completely different role then anything USF have in any of their tiers. EZ8 and 34/85 are the only units that match your 3rd point and that is why they are tech locked. And by the way, tech lock made them both arrive faster.
Posts: 1273
Posts: 468
First, it would put it in line with most factions where rocket artillery is tier locked.
Second, it would avoid USF just rushing to it while Ostheer and OKW are still using infantry and waiting for tanks.
Third, (and this one is the least important) it paralells with stock, being a sherman variant, though the m10 and the bulldozer might get away with it unless they get a unexpected buff to their original aim (AT and AI/AB respectively)
Most factions rocket artilery is not doctrine locked already.
USF rushing what?
You can have sherman well before you can call-in calli.
If anything, calli would arrive about 5 minutes FASTER and by the time the first comes out now, there would be 2 now.
Puma, MHT, 250, StuG-E, M5, M3, suxton, priest.
Explain them then.
It doesn't parallels with anything, its completely different unit with completely different role then anything USF have in any of their tiers. EZ8 and 34/85 are the only units that match your 3rd point and that is why they are tech locked. And by the way, tech lock made them both arrive faster.
Got Owned!
How about we put JT, KT, command panther, and whatever else call ins into tech tree as well?
Maybe do it for infantry as well? Jaeger, fallschim, ranger, airborne, ass grens, whatever else i missed.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
The call-in system is very confusing. I wish they would just streamline it some more. Can't have no-tech EZ-8s call in spam but STUG-E into Tiger is still alright for some reason. I wish they would just place all call-in tanks in the tech-tree.
Just don't touch my poor, 8CP KV1
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 238
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
I do agree with Aerohank though that they should really streamline vehicle call-ins. I'm still kind of shocked that Lend-Lease kept their Sherman call-in. Though I can kind of get why relic didn't - deciding which building to move them to can potentially drastically affect unit timing. For example Puma in OST Tier 2 is a lot different then 5 CP Puma.
Posts: 468
SHOULD TIGER BE ATTACHED TO GERMAN TIER 4, AND ELEFANT
Sure, but please add every allied call in as well. heavies are still limited to 1
lefh 18, ml 20, b4 are buildable. usf can build priests and calliopes. everything! make commanders usesless
Posts: 1653
The call-in system is very confusing. I wish they would just streamline it some more. Can't have no-tech EZ-8s call in spam but STUG-E into Tiger is still alright for some reason. I wish they would just place all call-in tanks in the tech-tree.
1000+
Posts: 444
Edit: You know what would be nice, a command p4 requiring t3 to build.
Posts: 656
The call-in system is very confusing. I wish they would just streamline it some more. Can't have no-tech EZ-8s call in spam but STUG-E into Tiger is still alright for some reason. I wish they would just place all call-in tanks in the tech-tree.
+1 to that. There is zero consistency with tech requirements vs call-ins. It really seems as though relic started to experiment with tech requirements using the E8 and T34/85 then dropped the project and never reverted the changes.
Posts: 960
The call-in system is very confusing. I wish they would just streamline it some more. Can't have no-tech EZ-8s call in spam but STUG-E into Tiger is still alright for some reason. I wish they would just place all call-in tanks in the tech-tree.
This is actually a pretty good idea.
+1.
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
Posts: 422 | Subs: 3
Livestreams
58 | |||||
5 | |||||
68 | |||||
30 | |||||
8 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1101614.642+2
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.271108.715+22
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM