Flamer for REs is a bit low, come on Relic. Enough with the $$. I think Flame RE spam will be the meta.
The buff for IS is going to be active it seems. A timed ability of about 20 seconds is not going to be OP I think.
As for commandos, the whole concept of "infiltration" is bad. But judging by the CP, I think they'll have a separate unit profile than Commandos (a weaker version of commandos).
a 5CP rocket arty will be in accurate AF. Although every faction should have rocket arty and the UKF does not have viable arty options (expect arty cover which is OP). I think it should have huge Suppression to counter blobs.
Repair is meh.
So in my opinion, this commander won't be OP. At least that's what it looks like by judging the CP requirements. Unless Relic decides to shove them up in our butts which is unlikely. Last couple of commanders were not OP.
Land Matress Commander
11 Feb 2016, 06:52 AM
#61
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
11 Feb 2016, 07:06 AM
#62
Posts: 708 | Subs: 1
LOL. Commander is not even realesed but you already claim it OP.
11 Feb 2016, 07:29 AM
#63
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
LOL. Commander is not even realesed but you already claim it OP.
remember when goliath doc was released and forum went apeshit? XD
didnt see a single goliath ingame, still
11 Feb 2016, 07:56 AM
#64
Posts: 959
Relic... Please stop giving everyone flame throwers and more arty.
It's fair that each faction have access to flame-throwers and rocket artillery, because that promotes more usage of combined arms and opens up room for more strategies for each faction. Previously UKF was the only faction which didn't have access to flame-throwers and rocket artillery unlike all other factions.
11 Feb 2016, 08:06 AM
#65
Posts: 366
Whats the chances that the land matress will be better than everything in the Royal Artillery Regiment since, you know, suppose to focus on artillery!
P.s In my opinion, this commander seems fine. We shall see through when he comes out.
P.s In my opinion, this commander seems fine. We shall see through when he comes out.
11 Feb 2016, 08:21 AM
#66
Posts: 77
Banned
remember when goliath doc was released and forum went apeshit? XD
didnt see a single goliath ingame, still
Now that you mention it..
I think the rest of the doc kinda sucks too hard to go for it
and the flares give it away.
11 Feb 2016, 08:54 AM
#67
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
so we will have flamers on Engy, those 4 entity ( 5 with upgrade ) that have a ridiculous low reinforcment cost at VET 3 ( will happen very fast with flamer ) what could go wrong again ? 
11 Feb 2016, 09:01 AM
#68
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
so we will have flamers on Engy, those 4 entity ( 5 with upgrade ) that have a ridiculous low reinforcment cost at VET 3 ( will happen very fast with flamer ) what could go wrong again ?
Probably nothing, just like when people were going batshit crazy for the same arguments with dual LMGs instead of flamer for REs.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
11 Feb 2016, 09:07 AM
#69
Posts: 1096
Am I the only one who's finding all flame weapons kinda 'meh' at the moment anyway?
11 Feb 2016, 09:47 AM
#70
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Am I the only one who's finding all flame weapons kinda 'meh' at the moment anyway?
nope not at all. flamer do serious dmg to 1) units in cover 2) units in houses and for me they work exactly like that.
they do however 0 dmg when the enemy is in the open or on negative cover, like it should be.
11 Feb 2016, 10:05 AM
#71
Posts: 295 | Subs: 1
Mortar emplacement after at first 3-4 mins in 2v2,3v3 games ...
LMG + Flames on 5 men close range inf
Mobile katy in first 7 mins (also its not emplacement)
Insta commandos to wipe and lay demo
LMG + Flames on 5 men close range inf
Mobile katy in first 7 mins (also its not emplacement)
Insta commandos to wipe and lay demo
11 Feb 2016, 10:13 AM
#72
Posts: 88
sorry to see factions become mirror
11 Feb 2016, 10:26 AM
#73
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently Banned
remember when goliath doc was released and forum went apeshit? XD
didnt see a single goliath ingame, still
+1
Relic killing our game, lets save COH2 from Relic 
If you're not a ахіs lover when you're 20, you have no heart. If you're not a soviet fanboy by the time you're 30, you have no brain.
Relic delenda est
If Dane will be have son, he will be call him (Sturmgeschütz)
Brotheres, what we do in coh2, ehoes in eternity
If you're not a ахіs lover when you're 20, you have no heart. If you're not a soviet fanboy by the time you're 30, you have no brain.
Relic delenda est
If Dane will be have son, he will be call him (Sturmgeschütz)
Brotheres, what we do in coh2, ehoes in eternity
11 Feb 2016, 11:00 AM
#74
3 
Posts: 545
Lots of furious rage in here. So many fingers pointed. Why don't we just agree that commanders come out unbalanced as a general rule of thumb, that means for both sides too.
This means acknowledging things like the worst commander on release the game ever saw, elite troops with tiger ace. Never to be forgotten, Siberian wins game with no army left, by calling in 1 tank. Even the B4 at release although ridiculous, wasn't a 1 machine army. So unless the landmattress is an I win button at release, it can be said that slowly there is improvement lol.
Never forget the ace release, never. Never never never.
This means acknowledging things like the worst commander on release the game ever saw, elite troops with tiger ace. Never to be forgotten, Siberian wins game with no army left, by calling in 1 tank. Even the B4 at release although ridiculous, wasn't a 1 machine army. So unless the landmattress is an I win button at release, it can be said that slowly there is improvement lol.
Never forget the ace release, never. Never never never.
11 Feb 2016, 11:20 AM
#75
Posts: 1220
u guys think this land matres will cost fuel ?
11 Feb 2016, 11:25 AM
#76
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
u guys think this land matres will cost fuel ?
certainly not, i cant think off a non-vehicle unit which costs fuel.
11 Feb 2016, 11:28 AM
#77
Posts: 622 | Subs: 1
Is scheldt out yet ?
11 Feb 2016, 11:47 AM
#78
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
certainly not, i cant think off a non-vehicle unit which costs fuel.
Emplacements.
There are also vehicles that doesn't cost fuel at all.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
11 Feb 2016, 11:47 AM
#79
Posts: 1220
certainly not, i cant think off a non-vehicle unit which costs fuel.
i wish it get reatret options
11 Feb 2016, 12:18 PM
#80
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Emplacements.
There are also vehicles that doesn't cost fuel at all.
true, but for me these are buildings (not units) just like tier building (okw) but its a matter of perspective
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
47 | ||
 |
|
|
38 | ||
|
|
|
|
31 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
12 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
5 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
839 users are online:
839 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49118
Welcome our newest member, Ava Sofia
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Ava Sofia
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM