Because many people think equally of light vehicle and light tanks.
Fair enough. It shouldn't 1v1 more expensive and high class vehicles like light tanks. Its in a place where its not really good at anything though. Except recon.
Posts: 1072
Because many people think equally of light vehicle and light tanks.
Posts: 5279
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
i think (as has been said) the 222 just needs a SLIGHT accuracy buff to move it from soviet big gun RNG to luchs lite.
no, i dont mean buff its gun to luchs level, simply more towards that level of reliability
no armour buffs
no health buffs
no "it should be immune to small arms because its an armoured car"
if its gun is a threat it wont NEED an defencive buff because walking up to it to shoot in the slots would be retarded then.
Posts: 2470
Actually it is already enough accurate when stopped.
I don't know the exact stat but whenever I build one and don't screw-up with, I keep it 20-30 minutes and its vet3.
Posts: 362
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
222 should have the exact same gun stats as the Luchs with armour comparable to the M20 imo (so 11 from 9). No health increase. Dunno what cost should be (thinking 40F), but that's how I think it should perform.
Main thing is it can't be made to outperform the US AAHT, because otherwise you kill the Lieutenant tier.
Posts: 51
-It could have a light 37mm cannon upgrade for 90 munis that gives it both AT and AI
92 | |||||
31 | |||||
23 | |||||
13 | |||||
8 | |||||
146 | |||||
14 | |||||
8 | |||||
6 | |||||
3 |