You mean like brit players had to wait for 2 months to even be able to compete in ANY game mode?
You forgot to mention the 3 (or was it 4?) Months Of ukf roflstomping everything ?
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
You mean like brit players had to wait for 2 months to even be able to compete in ANY game mode?
Posts: 43
You forgot to mention the 3 (or was it 4?) Months Of ukf roflstomping everything ?
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
You forgot to mention the 3 (or was it 4?) Months Of ukf roflstomping everything ?
Posts: 770
Not really relevant, because every single new faction was doing it upon release, vanila ones not being exception(4 min flame ht/Kv-8 hybrid in your base anyone?).
Posts: 1384
Sorry to hear you enjoyed the game more at release, I don't really understand how that is possible since the game was mostly RNG fest at release with heavy cheese (sniper clown cars anyone?).
It sounds like COH2 is no longer the game for you. Honestly at the end of the day, I still prefer COH1, but I cannot have that.
Posts: 23
Posts: 23
Yes, AEC is strong and comes early, but both axis factions are more then capable of fielding AT to counter it when it arrives just as allies are capable of fighting Luchs which arrives a minute later.
Posts: 1164
Well, with ukf they really have a hard time balancing I guess
flame bren op...then up
centaur op...then up
bofors op...then up
churchill op...then balanced
aec up...then balanced (except against ostheer) hope they won't nerf it into the ground
Imho the solution is really easy since it only affects ostheer. They just have to add more armor to the 222 for a mp/fuel increase like it has been suggested many times now.
Posts: 1384
(because, let's be honest, against ostheer it was)
Posts: 1164
Except it chewed up 222's and halftracks, was great for harassing their base (med bunkers were juicy targets) and decent against medium tanks like ostwind or pziv.
It was niche, which seems appropriate for side tech.
Posts: 526
Posts: 230
Permanently BannedPosts: 1164
I think it just needs a little snip to the range and make smoke a vet 1 or 2 ability.
You can't nerf it too much, because as Brits it is a choice between the Bofor and the AEC. It is refreshing that there is that option at the moment. It is quite a big sacrifice to take the AEC, especially since the Cromwell is basically superior in every way and is not THAT much more expensive.
Posts: 526
...and at the moment the decision to take AEC is a no-brainer, because your cromwell will still come at roughly the same time because of your increased map control with the AEC. that is if the game lasts long enough for a cromwell to even hit the field ;-)
Posts: 526
Posts: 33
...and at the moment the decision to take AEC is a no-brainer, because your cromwell will still come at roughly the same time because of your increased map control with the AEC. that is if the game lasts long enough for a cromwell to even hit the field ;-)
Posts: 526
Posts: 230
Permanently BannedPretty much I think the major issue with the AEC can be solved by righteously buffing the Ostheer, rather than too heavily nerfing the AEC.
Posts: 1164
Not so much a no-brainer as a necessity. Unless you go with the premium Spec Weps regiment, you'll get walked over by Luchs, flame HT or even 222 if it doesn't dive you. The only problem with the AEC right now is the vision and timing aspects that make it a tad strong vs Ostheer. At least grens have fasuts to punish over-aggression.
The reason it was buffed in the first place was due to it being an overpriced, worse Puma (40 range to 50) that needed side tech. It was far from 'fine' as many are advoctaing
Pretty much I think the major issue with the AEC can be solved by righteously buffing the Ostheer, rather than too heavily nerfing the AEC.
41 | |||||
38 | |||||
31 | |||||
23 | |||||
22 | |||||
5 | |||||
13 | |||||
12 | |||||
6 | |||||
5 |