But as brits my first unit out has to be AT guns vs luchs/ht/222 etc.. chill br0
apart from the fact that the 222 and ht have nowhere near the impact the AEC has and that the AEC counters both just fine, they also go down to small arms fire.
Posts: 1164
But as brits my first unit out has to be AT guns vs luchs/ht/222 etc.. chill br0
Posts: 1063
But as brits my first unit out has to be AT guns vs luchs/ht/222 etc.. chill br0
Posts: 513
apart from the fact that the 222 and ht have nowhere near the impact the AEC has and that the AEC counters both just fine, they also go down to small arms fire.
Posts: 1164
Yup my 2 sections are going to put a dent in a HT, oh wait..
Posts: 513
try 2 IS vs. HT and 2 grens vs. AEC. hint: ost loses in both cases... hard.
Posts: 1164
And remind me again the manpower and fuel costs required to unlock and get an AEC?
Posts: 513
remind me again why you have to rush an AT gun vs. ostheer but ostheer doesn't have to? or the fuel costs of building t1, unlocking t2, building t2 and building a 222/ht (or pak, for that matter)? remind me how this factors into whether the AEC is too strong or not?
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
remind me again why you have to rush an AT gun vs. ostheer but ostheer doesn't have to?
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
apart from the fact that the 222 and ht have nowhere near the impact the AEC has and that the AEC counters both just fine, they also go down to small arms fire.
Posts: 770
My fuel comparison was in regards to the cost difference of an AEC and 222/HT... Just because there is now a viable strategy where Brits can get an effective armored car doesn't change much for the game at all. Ost still had to get AT for Stuart/AAHT etc... and Brits still need AT immediately for Luchs etc... learn to adapt, I've had literally 0 issues with AEC... if I see it I just don't get aggressive until I have my PaK or just incendiary it to death.
Remember if a Brit player rushes an AEC, its a massive risk (like luchs rush is a risk) because it delays his Cromwell MASSIVELY.
Posts: 770
They also have nowhere near the cost of AEC.
Get three 222s and then you'll be able to compare them to AEC.
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1124
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Its very simple the defensive orientated brits should never have the offensive punch of the usf.
increase the fuel cost to 95. or revert the changes and buff the brit infantry which is much more sensible.
Posts: 1124
They also have nowhere near the cost of AEC.
Get three 222s and then you'll be able to compare them to AEC.
Posts: 1164
My fuel comparison was in regards to the cost difference of an AEC and 222/HT... Just because there is now a viable strategy where Brits can get an effective armored car doesn't change much for the game at all. Ost still had to get AT for Stuart/AAHT etc... and Brits still need AT immediately for Luchs etc... learn to adapt, I've had literally 0 issues with AEC... if I see it I just don't get aggressive until I have my PaK or just incendiary it to death.
Remember if a Brit player rushes an AEC, its a massive risk (like luchs rush is a risk) because it delays his Cromwell MASSIVELY.
lol wut
They also have nowhere near the cost of AEC.
Get three 222s and then you'll be able to compare them to AEC.
Posts: 243
Posts: 1006
WTF, just take some rank 1 opinion here ok! IT IS OP AS FU!!!!
Posts: 1124
Posts: 960
725 | |||||
80 | |||||
23 | |||||
6 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |