Posts: 40
HR
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Posts: 204
Posts: 2070
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
Posts: 196
Posts: 204
i do agree that t34 should be in t3, but making it a good AI uni would provide too much overlap with t70. It should just be cheap and heavily spammable.
KV1 with churchill stats would be kinda op imo. I do wish the KV-1 was in more doctrines or a non-doctrinal unit. Some unique units like this need to see more action in-game!
Posts: 49
Posts: 2070
how about just giving the kv 1 like 1200 health and leaving the other stats the same. KV 1 needs some love.
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
Posts: 1891
Posts: 118
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 609
Posts: 466
Posts: 33
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Posts: 40
No. T34 in T3 would be more expensive tho not cost-efficient.
Put non docrinal T34/85 in T4 and make T34/76 double call-in.
KV1 is fine. It's just need different vet. I mean, it needs suraviblity vet to become sponge damage, not mobility to flank like w fast medium tank.
HR
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Posts: 174
I like the first idea of putting the t34 back in T3 and put the kv1 in T4 and put the kv2 in counterattack. But what happens to the su76 then? Nobody will use su76......
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
hmm soo if this happend then the t34 will die cuz no one will usit, why spend 160 fuel for 2 crap tanks( i guess thy will be call in tanks ) when u can get a t85
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Not at all.
Imagine double 7-8CP call-in for 450MP and 150F.
It could save you a day when you can't afford T4 and T34/85
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
 |
|
|
51 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
46 | ||
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
