Login

russian armor

Penal Battalion a completely different approach

27 Dec 2015, 12:42 PM
#21
avatar of TAKTCOM

Posts: 275 | Subs: 1

I do not like reworking of conscripts. They are sort balanced.
Penal battalions weren't just "cannon fodder". They were often well equipped, much better than your run of the line strelki.

Where did you get this ?:huhsign:
27 Dec 2015, 12:45 PM
#22
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7

Im only one that like 6 men flametrower squad ?
aaa
27 Dec 2015, 13:33 PM
#23
avatar of aaa

Posts: 1487

that topic just a clinic. Maybe devs of this game will like it though
27 Dec 2015, 21:48 PM
#24
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

27 Dec 2015, 21:59 PM
#25
avatar of KyleAkira

Posts: 410

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Dec 2015, 11:49 AMVipper


DP Guards are long range infantry...Penals with double Far DPS would still not be long range infantry...


1 - It's a commander call-in
2 - It doesn't fulfill the long dps role in late game that you need.

USF have rifles with bars
UKF have tommies with brens
OST have Lmg grens
OKW have Obers with upgrade
SOV have to use a commander call in and it's the worst unit for AI long range in this list.
27 Dec 2015, 22:05 PM
#26
avatar of F1sh

Posts: 521

Why should we change Conscripts?

Maybe give Penals access to TM-35 mines at vet 2 or 3.
27 Dec 2015, 22:26 PM
#27
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1


... and one thing, what does happen to the at-nade, i dont really get what you want to do with it.

Glad to see you find the idea interesting the idea. There many thing that can be done about AT grenades. At grenades should probably remain on conscripts but without ourah they will have a more defensive role against crushing and protect other units from circle strafe.

Penal could get them and use with ourah and in that case ourah should probably make them more vulnerable.

A totally different approach would be to allow penal to climb on enemy tanks and built explosives on the tank taking more damage during the building process. They could then get jump of and detonated them causing some sort critical damage.

The concept is that Penal should be able to perform high risk/reward tasks.
27 Dec 2015, 22:35 PM
#28
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1


.
USF have rifles with bars
.


Rifles as Penal use semi automatic weapons that are good close to mid. Bar is also not great at long range. Making Penal long range would mean they would have to come with bolts action rifles, and replace the flamer with lmg upgrade.

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Dec 2015, 22:05 PMF1sh
Why should we change Conscripts?

As I explained before conscript have so much utility that Penal will always compare pale to them.
One could give more utility to Penals but then they would overlap or else one would have go overboard with their DPS to make more attractive.

The current performance of Penal is not that bad and they would be used allot more if one did not have to built T1 to get them even with no other change...What currently makes them unattractive is the T1 and the luck of an AT snare...

In my approach they have different roles and allows abilities like merge to become more attractive since the entities will be cheaper.
27 Dec 2015, 22:56 PM
#29
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

Soviets are doing fine rn. Penals do need a role change, but I think this can be established with stat changes or swapping ROK-3 for a DP-28 or PPSH.
27 Dec 2015, 23:18 PM
#30
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Dec 2015, 11:16 AMVipper
They where also used as canon fodder and not as semi elite infantries. They where even used to walk over minefields.
jump backJump back to quoted post27 Dec 2015, 11:48 AMVipper
Don't ask me about the minefields but the officers that sent them...


This is a largely a myth. Soviet Commanders would order attacks over minefields if casualty projections from the mine fields were less than attacking the fortifications head on. As a Soviet Officer, a casualty was a casualty, whether it be by mine, mortar, or bullet. It's probable that Penal Troops took part in attacks like these, it wasn't necessarily exclusive to them, ordinary Infantry did the same.
28 Dec 2015, 05:57 AM
#31
avatar of nodickwilliams

Posts: 230

Permanently Banned
I'd like to see penals become like ostruppen, but with explosives and flamethrowers.
28 Dec 2015, 08:04 AM
#32
avatar of Shell_yeah

Posts: 258

Make Penals start with Mosin rifles and choose between upgrades - Flamer+Satchels(these need to be fixed vs garrisons) for short range assault and SVT-40s+Hold the line ability(buffs to dps and rec acc but the unit cant retreat until ability ends) for long range and give same dps to svt-40 like before Penals nerf.
28 Dec 2015, 10:05 AM
#33
avatar of UGBEAR

Posts: 954

Make Penal the soviet ost-troopen...... dirt cheap and swarm the enemy
28 Dec 2015, 10:11 AM
#34
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Dec 2015, 10:05 AMUGBEAR
Make Penal the soviet ost-troopen...... dirt cheap and swarm the enemy

Squad like this already exists....

28 Dec 2015, 10:21 AM
#35
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Dec 2015, 10:11 AMKatitof

Squad like this already exists....


Conscripts are 20% more expensive than ostturppen and at the same price as grenadiers...
28 Dec 2015, 10:35 AM
#36
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Dec 2015, 10:21 AMVipper


Conscripts are 20% more expensive than ostturppen and at the same price as grenadiers...


And perform just like osttruppen, except cons are much worse on long range.

8 con builds have proven already that 40mp cost makes no difference for sov here.

You're trying to change squad that needs nothing more then long range dps boost into a squad that already exists, but would be even worse.
28 Dec 2015, 10:37 AM
#37
avatar of ElSlayer

Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

6-man cheap to build, cheap to reinforce squad with a flamer, satchel and oorah @vet2? I would buy that for a dollar!
28 Dec 2015, 12:06 PM
#38
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

Make Penals start with Mosin rifles and choose between upgrades - Flamer+Satchels(these need to be fixed vs garrisons) for short range assault and SVT-40s+Hold the line ability(buffs to dps and rec acc but the unit cant retreat until ability ends) for long range and give same dps to svt-40 like before Penals nerf.


That would make them even more useless.
28 Dec 2015, 12:14 PM
#39
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Dec 2015, 10:35 AMKatitof

And perform just like osttruppen, except cons are much worse on long range.
8 con builds have proven already that 40mp cost makes no difference for sov here.
You're trying to change squad that needs nothing more then long range dps boost into a squad that already exists, but would be even worse.


No they don't. Osttruppen are defensively oriented and good ONLY in cover and have a target size 15% bigger . Conscript are mobile and good in mid range.

Are seriously comparing a 8 squad built of Con with an 8 Squad built of Ost from a economical point of view?
For the same price Ostr could have more than 1,5 more squads and they can reinforce for 3/4 of the price...

A long DPS increase on Penals would not help allot since their upgrade flamer has a range of 20, so they lose 20% of their long DPS when they upgrade, they are designed to fight at mid and not far...

It would also not make more attractive since conscripts have allot more utility. Penals can not replace conscripts as the main line infantry and there is little point going t1 to built 1 or 2 of them.

As explain before making Penals attractive is not that easy as long as conscripts have so much utility and Penals have a tech cost.
28 Dec 2015, 12:21 PM
#40
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

If Penals could plant, let's say somekind of AI mines (which can shock vehicles), they could recive that utility.

Penals have smiliar problem to Assault Grens. They are only useful at close range, but they don't have enough survability to assault. Sure, there is hoorah but it's locked at vet 2.

Plus, SVT is way weaker than G43.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

762 users are online: 2 members and 760 guests
adamírcz, aerafield
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49107
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM