Centaur

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 09:50 AMJohnnyB

Supression is a verry bad idea. Such units would own infantry as hell. No.

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 07:15 AMvietnamabc

Centaur should have a reuduction in cost, I think 80 fuel is right with their current level of performance.

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 15:16 PMWingZero

I think the centaur is fine in terms of DPS, just need a buff in mobility.

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 15:49 PMUGBEAR

increase its speed, it moves like a heavy tank which is pretty stupid cuz its using the medium tank chassis with a even lighter turret.

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 16:03 PMferwiner

Relic designed every unit with one historically acurate feature in mind that defines the unit, then they think of other stats to make it more or less ballance. In this case this one defining feature is speed as centaurs were basically comets with underwhelming crusarder engine. Crusarder is way lighter tank you know and the engine was the same.

Also if you dont like even such a basic historical argument then lets say it would be just a boring ostwind copypasta without any special feature if you just buff the speed. Basically this is that one little thing that cannot be changed, move on to other ideas to improve the unit.

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 16:11 PMUGBEAR

It sucks right now, no hard feelings, save the money and get a fast cromwell or a Churchill is much safer way to go.

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 05:52 AMRomeo

The centaur seems really bad to me now. I have had no success with this unit at all since the nerf. I think the nerf was justified, especially against units in buildings. However, with its reduced DPS and extremely slow speed it seems completely pointless to get this unit when for just 20 mp more and 10 fuel more you could get the extremely capable and versatile cromwell. What do you guys think?

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 16:03 PMferwiner

Relic designed every unit with one historically acurate feature in mind that defines the unit, then they think of other stats to make it more or less ballance. In this case this one defining feature is speed as centaurs were basically comets with underwhelming crusarder engine. Crusarder is way lighter tank you know and the engine was the same.

Also if you dont like even such a basic historical argument then lets say it would be just a boring ostwind copypasta without any special feature if you just buff the speed. Basically this is that one little thing that cannot be changed, move on to other ideas to improve the unit.

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 19:01 PMIntelligence209

If you possibly think this unit needs any Buff it's because your used to abusing it and having a "click to win" unit. Let's compare to other AA units shale we? Because IT IS an AA unit (support). First it out classes US and SU AA in terms of armour and killing power, it is more accurate then the OH AA tank. And I would even like to say has more armour then the OH tank. Has more armour then the OKW AA, but I would say less killing power, then again doesn't require setup time. So no romeo does not need buff. It's fine where its at..