Login

russian armor

Pershing feedback

PAGES (7)down
31 Oct 2015, 19:03 PM
#101
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561



alright, if balance is about units itself, buff grens and volks, both lose 1v1 to riflemen. am i right?ÀM I RIGHT?
They are also cheaper, unlike pershing which will lose to the cheaper panther.
31 Oct 2015, 19:05 PM
#102
avatar of Bananenheld

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

They are also cheaper, unlike pershing which will lose to the cheaper panther.

ye because you need to spend 300 fuel for teching to get pershing?
31 Oct 2015, 19:22 PM
#103
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



alright, if balance is about units itself, buff grens and volks, both lose 1v1 to riflemen. am i right?ÀM I RIGHT?

You are so wrong that it makes Putin attack on ukraine right.
Guess what? They are supposed to because of balance.

Cheaper units of similar role lose to expensive units.
Its pretty straight forward.
31 Oct 2015, 19:30 PM
#104
avatar of Bananenheld

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post31 Oct 2015, 19:22 PMKatitof

You are so wrong that it makes Putin attack on ukraine right.
Guess what? They are supposed to because of balance.

Cheaper units of similar role lose to expensive units.
Its pretty straight forward.

why is the t70 better at its role (70 fuel) compared to ostwind (100)?

cherry picking

oh and nice political statement, but the world is not black and white (western hemisphere good guys /eastern hemisphere bad guys)
31 Oct 2015, 19:37 PM
#105
avatar of aradim

Posts: 110


why is the t70 better at its role (70 fuel) compared to ostwind (100)?

cherry picking

oh and nice political statement, but the world is not black and white (western hemisphere good guys /eastern hemisphere bad guys)


Because a t70 dies in 2 atg shots and the ostwind does not
31 Oct 2015, 19:38 PM
#106
avatar of Bananenheld

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post31 Oct 2015, 19:37 PMaradim


Because a t70 dies in 2 atg shots and the ostwind does not


still t70 fills the role better as anti inf vehicle than ostwind. if not swap stats and cost of both and i bet 99% of axis playerbase will be happy.
31 Oct 2015, 19:51 PM
#107
avatar of Gluhoman

Posts: 380



still t70 fills the role better as anti inf vehicle than ostwind. if not swap stats and cost of both and i bet 99% of axis playerbase will be happy.
Hell no. Ostwind have far more hp than t70. It is good AA unit and it's kill inf pretty good. So no, t70 and Ostwind are in a good spot.
31 Oct 2015, 19:58 PM
#108
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8


why is the t70 better at its role (70 fuel) compared to ostwind (100)?

cherry picking

oh and nice political statement, but the world is not black and white (western hemisphere good guys /eastern hemisphere bad guys)

I've said similar role.

Ostwind isn't exactly below 100 fuel light AI tank.
31 Oct 2015, 19:59 PM
#109
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

Comet is better than it.
31 Oct 2015, 20:13 PM
#110
avatar of Bananenheld

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

ok u guys convinced me with your arguments, pershings needs buffs because it underperfoms for its cost
31 Oct 2015, 20:18 PM
#111
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post31 Oct 2015, 18:09 PMaradim


480 fuel worth of units disregarding teching worth of untits is a magic combo? Really?


maybe because it is so expensive it is a good combo.

i think it is the best combo of tanks that you can get with 480 fuel. that is slightly more AT oriented.
31 Oct 2015, 21:20 PM
#112
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

Don't forget teching major and another tiers.


Don't forget that Relic probably made this commander for 3s and 4s. You can use it in 1s and 2s but Pershing is situational in smaller games and probably not worth it. Unless you have 2 Jacksons and 1 Pershing as Pigsoup said.
1 Nov 2015, 00:45 AM
#113
avatar of hannibalbarcajr

Posts: 503

thats not how balancing works.
An underpowered unit is a underpowered unit, it doesn't matter how well the rest of the faction is doing. Balance is done by a unit by unit basis and just because a faction is doing well doesn't exclude its underpowered units from getting buffs.

The Pershing currently isn't worth it's cost and needs changes.


True to an extent but each commander should take into account the faction's existing strengths and weakness. For instance people are complaining that Pershing doesn't rank with axis heavies but if it did match them for same cost that would be very bad as the USF already have a dominant early game. They should simply decrease the cost of the Pershing a little on both manpower and fuel. If you give the USF a heavy tank that is as good as any the Ostheer can field plus the Rangers for better AI than any Ostheer infantry (stock or doc) then the USF are better in every stage and in matches between equally skilled opponents the USF will be winning 75+%.
1 Nov 2015, 01:36 AM
#114
avatar of m00nch1ld
Donator 11

Posts: 641 | Subs: 1

pershing laughs at my tiger but than my stuka AT strafe laughs back :luvCarrot:
1 Nov 2015, 19:22 PM
#115
avatar of TaurusBully

Posts: 89

Of course balance takes more into account the whole faction than individual unit costs. Hence why these dumb fks that do not understand assymetrical balance cant take into acount the fact that pershing only takes 16cap, its fast as hell and has decent AI and AT.

No. They just want it to 1v1 a Tiger on a front armor battlle.
1 Nov 2015, 20:05 PM
#116
avatar of AngryKitten465

Posts: 473

Permanently Banned
Pershing needs more HP. 950 would do better.
1 Nov 2015, 20:20 PM
#117
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

I think Pershing dps (at vet 3 it reloads every 3 secs) and ability to fight on the move makes it really good. For its price it could be better though.
1 Nov 2015, 20:36 PM
#118
avatar of varunax

Posts: 210

Of course balance takes more into account the whole faction than individual unit costs. Hence why these dumb fks that do not understand assymetrical balance cant take into acount the fact that pershing only takes 16cap, its fast as hell and has decent AI and AT.

No. They just want it to 1v1 a Tiger on a front armor battlle.


The Pershing was designed to specifically take on the Tiger and Panther. Just like how the Panther was designed to counter the T34.
1 Nov 2015, 21:14 PM
#119
avatar of TaurusBully

Posts: 89

We are talking about game balance not real life purposes.
1 Nov 2015, 21:17 PM
#120
avatar of Nabarxos

Posts: 392

the Pershing is useless,it aint a heavy tank with such stats

it cant handle panthers nor tigers and i must flank them with my heavy for gods sake

i can flank with every armor unit USF has and get the same or better results then a pershing

right now Rifle company remains the best option for USF

PAGES (7)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

771 users are online: 771 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49852
Welcome our newest member, vn88company
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM