How can the t34 become a part of the meta?
Posts: 165 | Subs: 2
1. Put the T-34/76 back into the Tankoviy building, price it accordingly as a cheap tank that's a little weaker than the Panzer IV and Sherman.
2. Put the T-34/85 in the Mechanized building.
3. In the Mechanized building add a T-34/85 upgrade (Manpower and Fuel cost). This upgrade allows you to spend Munitions to refit any T-34/76 you already bought if you bring them back to the Mechanized building and wait X seconds for the refit to complete (can't move/shoot during refit process, and being fired upon interrupts it). Refit T-34s retain their veterancy, of course.
4. Optional: Once upgrade is bought, you can no longer buy T-34/76s from the Tanoviy building, you're stuck with buying brand new T-34/85s in the Mechanized building to replace any tank losses.
Posts: 210
KV-1 should've been in Tier 4. That's pretty much exactly how the Russian's had it in WW2. T-34's combined with KV-1 tanks. Similarly to American's Shermans/TDs.
Posts: 473
Permanently BannedMore consistent damage output would be nice
yes and better accuracy. Most of the times it misses everything that stands at 5 meters distance from it, yet it can suddenly totally random snipe a unit that is at the edge of its viewing range.
Posts: 1063
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
More consistent damage output would be nice
This. They could start with slightly buff to its MGs.
Posts: 83
Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
Removal of ram would be fine as well. Would love to see it replaced with flank speed that would give it speed boost of ram and last 2-3 seconds at vet 1.
Posts: 509 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
If it remains in t4, t34 deserves a buff yes or yes. By the time it hits the field has nothing to do in the game's stage.
Given that it comes at a similar time as the Ostheer PIV, it only needs slight buffs given its costs.
I will say this all the time Soviet T4 =/= Ostheer T4, it's more equivalent to the medium armour buildings for USF, Brits, and Ostheer.
Posts: 509 | Subs: 1
Given that it comes at a similar time as the Ostheer PIV, it only needs slight buffs given its costs.
I did not say the opposite. But p4 performs way better than t34. That's the main difference. It used to be ''decent'' if you rushed t3 to get an early t34, but in t4 this strat has no longer any sense.
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
I did not say the opposite. But p4 performs way better than t34. That's the main difference. It used to be ''decent'' if you rushed t3 to get an early t34, but in t4 this strat has no longer any sense.
The PIV should perform better though given the cost difference. It's the most costly non-doctrinal medium in the game. It's a 45 fuel difference hence why the T-34 should get a MP reduction to represents its need for numbers and more powerful MGs to make it more of a threat to infantry when the main cannon's on its long reload.
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
If we really want to make them be a quantity over quality tank, make them get bonuses when fighting near other T-34/76s. A sort of horde bonus that makes lone T-34s weak, but deadlier when in packs than they normally are. So essentially Sherman radio net, but more powerful, needs no vet, but only accepts other t-34/76s.
+2
Edit:
It doesn't fit thematically, because radio and coordination were a problem for the T34 but I like:
One is a target
Two are two targets
Three are a problem
Four are a reason to call for help
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
if you don't lose them and get about 4 of them... it's can be awesome
and the sad part - it's almost every time you don't get this critical mass
Thing is if you commit that critical mass it will take losses and that commitment had better win you the game because if not you just lost because you just lost all your stuff and fed the Axis vet.
Thing is we are talking something that was becoming obsolescent by 1943 and wondering why it's not so hot against late war armour and infantry AT.
Penetration, Survivability and AI are what it really lacks at this point
Posts: 509 | Subs: 1
The PIV should perform better though given the cost difference. It's the most costly non-doctrinal medium in the game. It's a 45 fuel difference hence why the T-34 should get a MP reduction to represents its need for numbers and more powerful MGs to make it more of a threat to infantry when the main cannon's on its long reload.
It's not about the cost difference, this can easy be fixed -just increase cost and buff t34-. The key is, for what do we need a cheap tank in t4 that is useless by the time it hits the field?
Posts: 371
Livestreams
21 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
19 | |||||
14 | |||||
10 | |||||
4 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.939410.696+5
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
11 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, xewiy33830
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM