Nobody with a working brain will buy this excuse of a commander.
lucky my brain don't work then
Posts: 374
Nobody with a working brain will buy this excuse of a commander.
Posts: 295 | Subs: 1
This thread is a good example of how hypocritical this community is.
Commander doesn't seem op at first glance: "Never gonna buy that shit"
Commander looks OP: "Relic is destroying this game with their P2W dlc policy but I'm gonna buy and abuse the commander anyways."
lololol
Posts: 713 | Subs: 2
Its not about it not being OP. Far from it in fact, the new unit the flame hetzer is quite clearly garbage. Useless vet, and is overpriced. Sturmpioneer flamethrower is nothing special, only good ability is recoup losses which is just stupid for other reasons. Stuka strike is decent but expensive. Commander rating: 4/10
Posts: 1006
Some dudes in the chat asked about optimisation and relic said "nope" .... in a long sentence
Posts: 713 | Subs: 2
And you are probably the guy protecting relic. How about they release not OP and not UP commanders? Or this is too much to ask for? British commanders are not OP (and OP shiet gonna be toned down), while they are still powerful.
Pershing commander is not OP probably, but its very powerfull. OKW commander is garbage. Every single ability is garbage. So please before calling any one hypocritical, think why community acts like this. If community asks for new commanders, but relic release shitty commanders, community could be mad and this is normal reaction.
Posts: 134
btw is it just me or is the flamer on sturms just a waste of munitions?
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently Bannedlol how do you know its strong? You just told me how nobody has played it. How is this shit commander any good? How its the flame hetzer that costs 135 fuel with no turret and no vet gain at all a good unit lol.
Brit commanders not OP ? Croc ? Commandos ? Avre ? Nuke arty that destoys entire armies ?
The new OKW commander is definitely stronger than some of the current OKW commanders it might need some tweaking but at least it's not gonna screw over the entire game for several months like it used to be when new commanders were released. If you want relic to release balanced commanders there's always a risk that they're slightly too strong/weak but I would much rather take that risk instead of having a new tiger ace.
Posts: 276
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
Posts: 974 | Subs: 2
They should maybe rename the okw commander to "Firefart"
Posts: 474
What's about this Recoup losses? It is working on volks only or what? What's wrong with it?
Posts: 295 | Subs: 1
Brit commanders not OP ? Croc ? Commandos ? Avre ? Nuke arty that destoys entire armies ?
The new OKW commander is definitely stronger than some of the current OKW commanders it might need some tweaking but at least it's not gonna screw over the entire game for several months like it used to be when new commanders were released. If you want relic to release balanced commanders there's always a risk that they're slightly too strong/weak but I would much rather take that risk instead of having a new tiger ace.
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently BannedPosts: 4301 | Subs: 2
Posts: 15
Nobody with a working brain will buy this excuse of a commander.
Posts: 1122
Posts: 713 | Subs: 2
All you mentioned are going to be toned down.
Stronger then what? Like all OKW commanders are stronger then this new one. Maybe Special Operation commander is weaker ... well, not weaker but lets say "on pair", and this commander sucks ass. Here is some fast facts why this commander suck:
1) Insanely muni dependent.
2) Volks already have flame nades to deal with garrisoned units. "its not very cost effective" is questionable, because using this new commander force me to use more then 1 sturmpio AND i'm left without ANY elite inf tanks. Not to mention that "its not cost effective" to pick commander just to counter this maxim in building and then play without any useful stuff ... but hay you countered maxim.
3) I have to rely ONLY on obersoldaten later on, since I wont have effective AI inf (and we saw how much time hetzer need to kill someone). So again I have to spend muni even on obersoldaten (who sucks btw)
4) Hetzer comes too late AND cost hell of a lot fuel AND Pop-cap.
5) Brad said that overall stumpios performance with flame is the same as without flame. And they are even weaker with flames against targets out of cover. And if they are weaker\the same then whats the point? Sturmpios are useless AI inf past first 5 mins.
6) Recoup losses ... well, not like OKW is the lest MP starved faction, but it also cost you 80 muni.
7) Salvage commander already provide Jaegers, arty which destroying howitzers, AI tank (which is cheaper AND more effective then hetzer) AND gives you tough salvage.
8) HEAT shells got fixed and now they are finally useful AND this commander have Sturmtiger - heavy blob counter.
9) Rocket barrage ... mkay, you could save 100 fuel, have a Hetzer and then spend 200 muni per Stuka zu Fuss barrage, with SAME sound, with FLARES, with SAME damage. Fair trade.
So again how this commander is useful sorry? This commander cover only one area - OMG ENEMY IN BUILDING BURN THEM. But there is 10001 way to deal with them using correct OKW. Its not about UP\OP commanders, its about commanders which simply dont worth picking, since there is hell of a lot other commanders which can be effective in different situations, not on 1 out of 10 games.
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently BannedIf hetzer is bad than this commander is useless.
Posts: 1122
So yes the commander is useless.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
This thread is a good example of how hypocritical this community is.
Commander doesn't seem op at first glance: "Never gonna buy that shit"
Commander looks OP: "Relic is destroying this game with their P2W dlc policy but I'm gonna buy and abuse the commander anyways."
lololol
74 | |||||
62 | |||||
54 | |||||
25 | |||||
158 | |||||
17 | |||||
12 | |||||
4 | |||||
1 | |||||
0 |