Finally, very nice to see new content. - More please!
and maps!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecfe2/ecfe2613eb6afd4b4388b8d76da1403b9fb07925" alt=":) :)"
Posts: 15
Posts: 58
Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2
This thread is a good example of how hypocritical this community is.
Commander doesn't seem op at first glance: "Never gonna buy that shit"
Commander looks OP: "Relic is destroying this game with their P2W dlc policy but I'm gonna buy and abuse the commander anyways."
lololol
Posts: 656
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
This thread is a good example of how hypocritical this community is.
Commander doesn't seem op at first glance: "Never gonna buy that shit"
Commander looks OP: "Relic is destroying this game with their P2W dlc policy but I'm gonna buy and abuse the commander anyways."
lololol
Posts: 295 | Subs: 1
Posts: 27
Is clearly better than most OKW commanders.
Flamehetzer is a good Anti Infantry unit that is not paper and useless waste of resources like flak half-track, its a bit too expensive in fuel but that can be fixed later.
also
I think the 'recoup losses' ability will make sturmpioneer/obersoldaten viable.
By doing a free trial to try them out proves that they are confident about the commanders strength
we can only guess now but
try before buy, which we can. that's how it should be
p.s.: i expect more commanders
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently BannedWhy cant we get balanced commander? Not OP or not UP ? It seems like all who don't like this commander are douches and all normal ppl would swallow even decal for 9.99 as be thankful for new content.
Why should we say that this commander is shit if it is shit? Why shouldn't we say "we don't buy this crap", if this commander is weak at the release? But hey, we can get new handsome german commander in our loadout and have new abilities. Hell, who cares that they are not worth a single muni ITS NEW CONTENT BE THANKFUL !!!
Posts: 473
Permanently BannedThis thread is a good example of how hypocritical this community is.
Commander doesn't seem op at first glance: "Never gonna buy that shit"
Commander looks OP: "Relic is destroying this game with their P2W dlc policy but I'm gonna buy and abuse the commander anyways."
lololol
Posts: 1702
Lolololol one commander glorious with super tank and infantry of the gods.
Other doctrine gives flamers to units that don't need them, gives flamehetzer that can't kill shit and gives mp return for lost models to a faction that is floating manpower 90% of the time.
This is simply a case of lelic being hurdurrdurr lelic that pisses people off. They have no clue to what they are doing. Add potent and good commanders for every faction, or don't.
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently BannedAlso costs the exact same on a faction with a fuel penalty, no turret, lower durability and less HP. ABsolutely worthless veterancy as it required 45 men killed to even achieve vet1
Ah yes, flamehetzer doing exactly same DPS as croc/kv-8 is underpowered, horribly. Clearly it needs to do more damage because its axis
God just lol. Airborne with thompsons are 10 mp cheaper than rangers. "significant"
And being significantly cheaper.
Super tank? Pershing has the exactly same stats as the comet durability wise, has worse veterancy. Is incomparably slower compared to the comet (still decently fast though) and only has somewhat better pen and AOE. Comet is a supertank according to you?
Posts: 1702
Also costs the exact same on a faction with a fuel penalty, no turret, lower durability and less HP. ABsolutely worthless veterancy as it required 45 men killed to even achieve vet1
God just lol. Airborne with thompsons are 10 mp cheaper than rangers. "significant"
Yeah that 5.5 second reload with 4 fuckin AOE and 50 range, just gonna be squad wipe city. The pershing is going to have better AI than an is2 and a tiger. Shitty top mounted turrets don't mean shit when you can just derp blast entire squads from 50 range + turn on combined arms self spotting increased range bullshit. Lol just lol. You attack people for being biased, but all you're doing is the same exact shit conveniently forgetting everything that doesn't suit the argument and propping up your own because you know the unbiased truth makes your argument terrible.
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently Banned
4 AOE? Tiger has 3.5 AOE and IS-2 i dont remember but also has way better AOE. Tiger has 45 range. Oh noes. How horrible. Tiger also has faster reload, and less scatter i believe. But gotta scream OP, because i have no idea what im actually talking about. Better AI than IS-2 means jack shit because IS-2 is completely awful againts infantry. Now, if it will be around the same anti infantry as a tiger, then obviously will be OP because its not axis
Airborne are 28mp to reinforce, rangers are 32.
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently BannedPosts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Posts: 295 | Subs: 1
Ah yes, flamehetzer doing exactly same DPS as croc/kv-8 is underpowered, horribly. Clearly it needs to do more damage because its axis
Posts: 102 | Subs: 22
Posts: 474
its going to be 280/100 just an fyi for the flame hetzer when it goes live.
Posts: 473
Permanently Bannedits going to be 280/100 just an fyi for the flame hetzer when it goes live.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
188 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
70 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
53 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
48 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
29 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
17 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
7 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
81 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
67 |