Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » PG being incapable of anti-inf with the double shrek upgrade

PG being incapable of anti-inf with the double shrek upgrade

PAGES (5)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
Bananenheld
17 Oct 2015, 17:06 PM
#61
avatar of Bananenheld

Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Oct 2015, 16:55 PMZombiFrancis
I think their costs only seem expensive when compared to their other shrekked counterparts: volksgrenadiers.

For 235 manpower and albeit only one shrek for 90 munitions, those volks retain a great deal of their AI. Then they start acquiring vet (up to two extra levels!!11) and scale wonderfully and durably.

Panzergrenadiers are not the same kinds of unit, and I can see how people who are used to volksgrenadiers' AT package might get frustrated/confused. They are best used defensively, as they are flimsy, don't get sniper level accuracy with extra levels of vet, and drop their shreks on retreat like crazy. Even though it is only 120 munitions for two shreks, a four man squad having two shreks is a recipe for allied shrek usage.

They are best kept in cover to protect your flank and/or your paks from armored rushes.

Are there more expansive weapon upgrades than PzGrens shrek? I never realized they cost 1-2-0 munitions
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
ZombiFrancis
17 Oct 2015, 17:21 PM
#62
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742

Well, it is 120, but you get two of them. Volks spend 90 for just one.
Strategic Territory Points Mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
elchino7
17 Oct 2015, 18:05 PM
#63
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

Price could be adjusted to 100muni due to cost opportunity but i don't think it's neccesary.

They are fine.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
gman1211
17 Oct 2015, 18:27 PM
#64
avatar of gman1211

Posts: 133

These are the best AT infantry in the game by a long shot. I make 1-2 squads with shreks almost every game, it totally shuts out light vehicles and they remain super useful late game. Late game they counter units like, Su85, Jackson's, su76, any medium tank (less so then the others, but they still hurt them bad); so you know, pretty much everything allies use to threaten your German heavy tanks.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
What Doth Life?!
17 Oct 2015, 18:57 PM
#65
avatar of What Doth Life?!
Patrion 27

Posts: 1664

Well that's strange... Johnny seems to have disappeared from the thread as soon as you showed screenshots to prove your point. :snfBarton:

I agree more units should have to make choices with their upgrades. So -1 to toggle.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
JohnnyB
18 Oct 2015, 08:36 AM
#66
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Oct 2015, 13:25 PMAustralian Magic







I can prove everything I say. Im not biased. But it would nice if someone like you, so actice in balance section, finally upload a good replay ;)


Oh, and it's not preview with nerfed stens. It's current version with insane DPS.
So with the nerf, PzGrens will be able to win against approaching Commandos even without cover, I belive.


Hm. If we are going to make fun and moke each other, it's not the place here. This is not a video. These are 2 pictures. A video would show that that last commando didn't arrive there after the commando squad being stopped several times in order to be gunned down better, for instance.

Making things up just to prove a point and show people are mistaken because they disagree to you, it's the way to go it seems. Nice. What these pictures actualy "prove"? We are not ALL stupid , you know. Anyway this is going to far. I let you here with your "proofs" and your extremely biased attitude.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
nee
18 Oct 2015, 11:30 AM
#67
avatar of nee

Posts: 1216

...or you can just get a Grenadier/ second Panzergrenadier squad, like literally everyone else has been doing without fuss for the past two years.

/thread
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Corsin
18 Oct 2015, 11:34 AM
#68
avatar of Corsin

Posts: 600

I think the issue isnt Pgrens.... but a lack of shock infantry on the Axis side...

Pgrens and Sturmpio's are good ect... (mid rage)

But still get butchered by Shocks/Commandos/Thompsons. The axis doesn't really have any equivalent to the point black bum rape units that the allies do and its only gonna become more obvious when the rangers get here.












Playercard of Corsin

1v1: Pstreak: + 2
1v1: Pstreak: + 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 6
1v1: Pstreak: + 5


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Australian Magic
18 Oct 2015, 11:42 AM
#69
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Oct 2015, 08:36 AMJohnnyB


Hm. If we are going to make fun and moke each other, it's not the place here. This is not a video. These are 2 pictures. A video would show that that last commando didn't arrive there after the commando squad being stopped several times in order to be gunned down better, for instance.

Making things up just to prove a point and show people are mistaken because they disagree to you, it's the way to go it seems. Nice. What these pictures actualy "prove"? We are not ALL stupid , you know. Anyway this is going to far. I let you here with your "proofs" and your extremely biased attitude.



:lol::lol::lol:

Let me put it this way. In your world, I probably stopped commandos 20 times, in real word I did not even once but Im not going to convince you at all. No need to spend time.
Once I showed pics with vet 4 SP killing vet 3 LMG Paras on mid range.
One guy was laughing, because "there was ISG shooting at paras". So I showed him full screen with icon list. He never quoted me again.

But I just want to see you without any reasonable argument, that I will show you pic with timer on. So, tell me, how many times I could stoped them during 11sec? :clap::clap:

Oh, wait, I probably learned how to use photoshop, just to tweak numbers on timer :loco:
And if I stopped them, why all bodies are around the sandbags and not on the way through open field? :luvDerp:





Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Muxsus
18 Oct 2015, 11:52 AM
#70
avatar of Muxsus

Posts: 170

It's ok Johnny, he can't actually be telling the truth. He probably used hold fire to make them lose, what a biased guy he is.

:snfPeter:
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Australian Magic
18 Oct 2015, 12:09 PM
#71
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Oct 2015, 11:52 AMMuxsus
It's ok Johnny, he can't actually be telling the truth. He probably used hold fire to make them lose, what a biased guy he is.

:snfPeter:


I hope, this is troll post, but in case if Johnny is going to catch your thought I can already warn him that if he looks closely, he will see that Commandos are aiming :luvDerp:
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Swift
18 Oct 2015, 12:16 PM
#72
avatar of Swift

Posts: 2723 | Subs: 1

Let's play nicely, please, it's a game not the house of commons.
The internal battery has run dry, the game can now be played. However, clock based events will no longer occur.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
elchino7
18 Oct 2015, 14:26 PM
#73
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

You just put invincible mode on those PG or even worse, you just made a whole new mod just to prove you are right :banana:

My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Omega_Warrior
18 Oct 2015, 14:32 PM
#74
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Oct 2015, 18:05 PMelchino7
Price could be adjusted to 100muni due to cost opportunity but i don't think it's neccesary.

They are fine.
They already have a cheaper opportunity cost. The real cost of a schrek is 75 munitions.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Butcher
18 Oct 2015, 15:22 PM
#75
avatar of Butcher

Posts: 1217

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Oct 2015, 18:05 PMelchino7
Price could be adjusted to 100muni due to cost opportunity but i don't think it's neccesary.

They are fine.
Not too sure about that one. The price needs to be high or it will be too easy to spam.

Also the synergy with the "fuel to ammo" conversion would be too good at only 100 mun.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
korgoth
18 Oct 2015, 16:00 PM
#76
avatar of korgoth

Posts: 170

PGren are working fine right now.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
BeefSurge
18 Oct 2015, 16:26 PM
#77
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Oct 2015, 09:00 AMluvnest
Lol wut? In fact there should be more decision making like this. Either you have a dedicated anti infantry squad or you upgrade them to be anti tank. No to toggle.
The Fascisti Will Pay.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Shell_yeah
18 Oct 2015, 16:26 PM
#78
avatar of Shell_yeah

Posts: 258

Imagine if you drive a couple tanks into a blob of Pgrens and they all simultaneously toggle schrecks and your tanks disappear in 2 secs, pgrens get insta vet3 for killing tanks, untoggle the schrecks and after that keep killing all your infantry with their vet3 bonuses. :snfPeter: balans
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
kafrion
18 Oct 2015, 21:20 PM
#79
avatar of kafrion

Posts: 371

pgs are more than fine , if anything they should give the schreck the same scatter or damage as the zook and make it cost a bit less
Please relic and sega just take it easy with the dlc ...
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Thunderhun
19 Oct 2015, 01:13 AM
#80
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Oct 2015, 18:05 PMelchino7
Price could be adjusted but i don't think it's neccesary.

He is fine.


:ot:
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (5)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » PG being incapable of anti-inf with the double shrek upgrade

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
9
 Download
Download
1236
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

660 users are online: 660 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49152
Welcome our newest member, Cummings
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM