Login

russian armor

October Balance Preview

  • This thread is locked
PAGES (11)down
12 Oct 2015, 15:16 PM
#161
avatar of Adrien_Fowl

Posts: 47

I was expecting some changes that would give players some time to react to squad wipes by the British Centaur. It looks like we will have to keep waiting.

I am happy flames are going to be tuned down, they were clearly overperforming, but, goddammit, what about the bloody Centaur? :(
12 Oct 2015, 15:21 PM
#162
avatar of adrian23

Posts: 87

Why was Churchill double nerfed? Decrease the armor would've sufficed.


because relic a:snfPeter:
12 Oct 2015, 15:36 PM
#163
avatar of Rollo

Posts: 738

That KV-8 Nerf is freaking huge


good, I'm tired of playing against those things every single game like the old flamer HT.

It should be a specialist unit to help on urban maps, not a shock unit to help you burn all the enemies volks, AT guns and base structures in the blink of an eye.
12 Oct 2015, 15:46 PM
#164
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

So... If Centaur can hardly kill unit in builings, if Brits still don't have indirect fire, flamer infantry, incediary nades and useful arty, how they gonna clear heavy fortifications? :foreveralone:
12 Oct 2015, 17:38 PM
#165
avatar of Muxsus

Posts: 170

So... If Centaur can hardly kill unit in builings, if Brits still don't have indirect fire, flamer infantry, incediary nades and useful arty, how they gonna clear heavy fortifications? :foreveralone:


Royal Artillery Regiment :snfPeter:

Also wasp and sniper.
12 Oct 2015, 17:46 PM
#166
avatar of Qbix

Posts: 254

That ISG and Howie accuracy nerf has to be a typo... the change would be minimal...
12 Oct 2015, 17:55 PM
#167
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Oct 2015, 14:38 PMAladdin
Test Centuar in the new patch mode preview vs units in garrison. it barely does any damage to them at all!!

A nerf would have been fine but not to make it useless against garrison!

try Centuar with rear armor to mg42 AP rounds in building. it takes centuar to half HP!!!
1 shreck in garrison owns centuar at ease
and generally it takes ages for centuar to kill any unit in garrison.

I don't think that sounds right


Make a test, a compare it how it performs in comparison to:

Flak HT
AA HT (USF)
Flakpanzer
M5 Quad
T70/P2
12 Oct 2015, 17:58 PM
#168
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Oct 2015, 17:38 PMMuxsus


Royal Artillery Regiment :snfPeter:

Also wasp and sniper.


Wasp? You mean this little squishy early-game unit?
Keeping it alive in middle-late game just for clearing building is truly stupid and really hard.
Try to keep kubel alive from 10min+.
Sniper is slow and micro intensive.
All factions have a way to clear budiling with much less micro.
Also sniper and wasp cannot do anything to OKW builings.
This is where you need indirect which Brits dont have at all.


I belive advice abour arty regiment is just troll :foreveralone:
12 Oct 2015, 18:55 PM
#169
avatar of Aladdin

Posts: 959



Make a test, a compare it how it performs in comparison to:

Flak HT
AA HT (USF)
Flakpanzer
M5 Quad
T70/P2


you can only compare it to flakpanzer not the other 4 you mentioned, indeed you can't even compare it with the flak panzer, you know why? flakpanzer (Ostwind) is a great unit with very excellent mobility, however Centuar moves too slowly almost like a heavy tank, so that is a wrong comparison you are making dude
12 Oct 2015, 19:41 PM
#170
avatar of hannibalbarcajr

Posts: 503



I missed this bit earlier, it's wrong. Commandos do around 120 DPS, models have 80 health. Commandos ambush can wipe even Obersoldaten in 4 unless they are Vetted.

Have not tried the balance patch but I still think commandos will be awesome for surprise attacks and flanking support weapons. They will probably not be at all viable as frontline troops now that their damage goes way down which I am OK with.
12 Oct 2015, 19:43 PM
#171
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7

Relic told us that british can be played as 2 factions.

Agressive or defensive

But now you simply cannot play competitivly with 1-2 emplacements
12 Oct 2015, 19:58 PM
#172
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

Have not tried the balance patch but I still think commandos will be awesome for surprise attacks and flanking support weapons. They will probably not be at all viable as frontline troops now that their damage goes way down which I am OK with.


I did test them, they're not bad but I don't suppose they're excellent either. From an ambush they still beat Panzergrenadiers with only 2 model loses, as opposed to no model losses. StG Obersoldaten are no longer easy targets though, and they cannot be ambushed because their IR Rifles detect the Commandos forcing the British to either force an attack and lose, or retreat. They will lose to Vet 3 Panzergrenadiers, but I don't consider that a bad thing because wiping Vet 3 Panzergrenadiers with ease is bullshit -_-
12 Oct 2015, 20:05 PM
#173
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Oct 2015, 18:55 PMAladdin


you can only compare it to flakpanzer not the other 4 you mentioned, indeed you can't even compare it with the flak panzer, you know why? flakpanzer (Ostwind) is a great unit with very excellent mobility, however Centuar moves too slowly almost like a heavy tank, so that is a wrong comparison you are making dude


No, because bar flamers, no other vehicle excels at clearing garrisons.
12 Oct 2015, 20:09 PM
#174
avatar of m00nch1ld
Donator 11

Posts: 641 | Subs: 1

So... If Centaur can hardly kill unit in builings, if Brits still don't have indirect fire, flamer infantry, incediary nades and useful arty, how they gonna clear heavy fortifications? :foreveralone:

Breetz dont have indirect fire. WHAT?
12 Oct 2015, 20:21 PM
#175
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

If you follow Relic Balance logic, they use to overchange stats from OP to UP, or the other way aroud to finally set the stat in the middle. But sometime they forget the last part :D

12 Oct 2015, 20:29 PM
#176
avatar of cr4wler

Posts: 1164

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Oct 2015, 18:55 PMAladdin


you can only compare it to flakpanzer not the other 4 you mentioned, indeed you can't even compare it with the flak panzer, you know why? flakpanzer (Ostwind) is a great unit with very excellent mobility, however Centuar moves too slowly almost like a heavy tank, so that is a wrong comparison you are making dude


alright, then replace ostwind with centaur. i doubt any ostheer player will complain.
12 Oct 2015, 20:29 PM
#177
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2


Breetz dont have indirect fire. WHAT?

You mean useless and pointless to build mortar pit? :foreveralone:
12 Oct 2015, 20:32 PM
#178
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384

Relic told us that british can be played as 2 factions.

Agressive or defensive

But now you simply cannot play competitivly with 1-2 emplacements


You totally can.
12 Oct 2015, 20:46 PM
#179
avatar of m00nch1ld
Donator 11

Posts: 641 | Subs: 1


You mean useless and pointless to build mortar pit? :foreveralone:

Thats still indirect fire :romeoMug:
12 Oct 2015, 20:48 PM
#180
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8


Thats still indirect fire :romeoMug:

And volks are still ai infantry without shreck :sibPheasant:
PAGES (11)down
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

591 users are online: 591 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49064
Welcome our newest member, cablingindfw
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM