Posts: 824
I would say allow it. It adds excitement and reward for good or poor play. All players know the risk of getting an abandonment. Therefore if they decided to rush their vehicle into the enemy then that's their own choice. If your unit get's stolen then that is your fault and you should be punished for it.
Posts: 18
4 Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
 | Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 836 | Subs: 5
| Playercard of Dusty | |||||||||||||||
|
Devils_Brigade: man captain molo why dont you just buy and m3 drive that around instead of playing coh
Posts: 1216
2 Posts: 466 | Subs: 1
| Playercard of RtN.momo4sho | |||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Posts: 10
Posts: 4928
I agree with Dusty that there should a way to make vehicle abandonment a near certainty but is the only method to make it happen. Early pre-release CoH2 press articles once indicated that heavily damaged enemy tanks (representing popped hatches) could be mounted by your own infantry for a risky but deadly attack to punish unsupported tanks. I'd be happy if a busted hatch critical at below 25% tank health allowed infantry to toss in a grenade or something to cause abandonment. It could take a few seconds for the infantry to pull off, and they'd suffer penalties to recieved accuracy and damage while they're at it.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
5 Posts: 1157 | Subs: 2
Posts: 348
interesting only to you, the outcome of that scenario is also luck-dependant, if someone happens to have a squad near the area and recapture the KT, is never because he predicted vehicle was going to be abandoned, what is "interesting" in watching both opponents right-clicking and the nearer squad to the KT capture it?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKlnjwzT1IruAZFb0EA-5pQ
Posts: 622
Posts: 3293
I would say allow it. It adds excitement and reward for good or poor play. All players know the risk of getting an abandonment. Therefore if they decided to rush their vehicle into the enemy then that's their own choice. If your unit get's stolen then that is your fault and you should be punished for it.
Failure is always an option. 
It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!)
Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences. 
To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage! 
and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!
Posts: 1026
Posts: 2819
I always thought that abandoning as an RNG mechanic was silly.
If there were certain criteria that made abandoning a tank guarantees and was a well designed core part of the game id be all for it.
Posts: 2819
I would say allow it. It adds excitement and reward for good or poor play. All players know the risk of getting an abandonment. Therefore if they decided to rush their vehicle into the enemy then that's their own choice. If your unit get's stolen then that is your fault and you should be punished for it.
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Posts: 4928
I always thought that abandoning as an RNG mechanic was silly.
If there were certain criteria that made abandoning a tank guarantees and was a well designed core part of the game id be all for it.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
Posts: 762 | Subs: 4
Posts: 721
yeah regarding the esl esport thing it should definitely be removed. Every RNG factor is bad for competitive games
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
NO WAY IN HELL! ENOUGH WITH COOL-FEATURE-STARVING THE GAME! BRING BACK COLDTECH TO AUTOMATCH NAOW!
And Rostov ffs.
And then STILL be ashamed some more to learn lesson good.
The people who only play to win need to disappear from this game and go play chess or fighting games. Fuck esports.
 |
|
|
66 | ||
 |
|
|
33 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
0 | ||
|
|
|
|
56 | ||
|
|
|
|
39 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
