Login

russian armor

Why should 17P cost fuel and cannot shoot through wall?

17 Sep 2015, 13:58 PM
#1
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

while Pak43 cost no fuel and wallhax 24/7? :foreveralone:
DeC
17 Sep 2015, 14:06 PM
#2
avatar of DeC

Posts: 102

Different factions, different design, different shortcomings/advantages.
17 Sep 2015, 14:06 PM
#3
avatar of luvnest
Strategist Badge
Patrion 39

Posts: 1094 | Subs: 20

I would rather decrease the MP cost of Pak43 and the LeFH and add a fuel cost to be in line with the Brits emplacements.
17 Sep 2015, 14:10 PM
#4
avatar of Rollo

Posts: 738

Pak43 doesn't have brace.

17pdr could use a decrease in price and popcap though.
17 Sep 2015, 14:46 PM
#5
avatar of Rocket

Posts: 728

I don't think the fuel cost is the problem with brits it is the damn MP cost especially for mortar pits there MP cost is insane. Of course fixing IS mp drain might help.
17 Sep 2015, 14:52 PM
#6
avatar of Iron Emperor

Posts: 1653

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 14:06 PMluvnest
I would rather decrease the MP cost of Pak43 and the LeFH and add a fuel cost to be in line with the Brits emplacements.


It would be unfair for an fuel stared or better said fuel penaltied faction as the OKW to do that. I'd earlier want to see a fuel decrease or removal
17 Sep 2015, 15:11 PM
#7
avatar of BlackKorp

Posts: 974 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 14:06 PMluvnest
I would rather decrease the MP cost of Pak43 and the LeFH and add a fuel cost to be in line with the Brits emplacements.


But the Brit's one is also non doctrinal ;)
17 Sep 2015, 15:18 PM
#8
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



But the Brit's one is also non doctrinal ;)

Ost ostwind and OKW ostwind cost the same, one is doctrinal one is not.
OKW one isn't cheaper because its doctrinal.


Just saying somewhat related example for the argument.
17 Sep 2015, 15:23 PM
#9
avatar of Mittens
Donator 11

Posts: 1276

I feel like the pak43 shouldn't get an acceptation to shoot through buildings. Its just silly, Units shouldn't be able to shoot through buildings.
17 Sep 2015, 15:24 PM
#10
avatar of Maschinengewehr

Posts: 334

Just on a semi-related side note:

Using the 17pdr's garrison bonus alongside the Command Vehicle's current aura buff, it makes the 17pdr shoot at a ridiculously fast rate. It shoots so fast that the reload animation only half completes before it shoots again haha.
17 Sep 2015, 15:43 PM
#11
avatar of Rekkettenn

Posts: 76

because krupp steel
17 Sep 2015, 16:00 PM
#12
avatar of BlackKorp

Posts: 974 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 15:18 PMKatitof

Ost ostwind and OKW ostwind cost the same, one is doctrinal one is not.
OKW one isn't cheaper because its doctrinal.


Just saying somewhat related example for the argument.


#game mechanics #faction design :thumb:
17 Sep 2015, 16:06 PM
#13
avatar of SirRaven of Coventry

Posts: 167

Permanently Banned
pak 43 can get decrewed by a summer breeze. From my understanding, 17 pounder can't get decrewed that quickly.
17 Sep 2015, 16:29 PM
#14
avatar of Robbie_Rotten
Donator 11

Posts: 412

because one is doctrinal and one isn't. Though I can't honestly think of a situation where I would buy a 17 pounder and not just get a firefly with command tank.

Especially after brace nerf.
17 Sep 2015, 16:37 PM
#15
avatar of Plaguer

Posts: 498

The pak43 is doctrinal and the doctrines are not too good (For ostheer atleast) and it gets decrewed or even destroyed from pretty much any decent artillery (With extremely good rng it survives with only a few soldier losses or some light dmg to the actual gun)

And about the 17p emplacement, it doesn't bleed MP when hit with most indirect, doesn't really require to have a reinforcement spot next to it, can take a ST shot to the face without getting destroyed (Pak43 can't survive a AVRE shot for comparison), and it has brace to take even less dmg from any sort of attack

These two are so differently designed that they shouldn't be compared imo

The only thing they should change about the Pak43 is the veterancy, it gets vet way too quickly
17 Sep 2015, 18:23 PM
#16
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

pak 43 can get decrewed by a summer breeze. From my understanding, 17 pounder can't get decrewed that quickly.


This. If you add fuel price, then PAK should resist against heavy bombardment and crew should be un-sniprable.
17 Sep 2015, 18:31 PM
#17
avatar of UGBEAR

Posts: 954

20 pop cap.....sigh
17 Sep 2015, 18:35 PM
#18
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

17 is good but not worth its price.
With today's brace nerf its going to be useless. Just force to brace, wait for cooldown and kill with anything cause you wont be able to repair under mortars or leig fire.
And that pop cap :foreveralone:
17 Sep 2015, 18:40 PM
#19
avatar of Arclyte

Posts: 692

As usual, relic does not balance in increments and completely overnerfs units
17 Sep 2015, 19:17 PM
#20
avatar of MoerserKarL
Donator 22

Posts: 1108

pak 43 can get decrewed by a summer breeze. From my understanding, 17 pounder can't get decrewed that quickly.


+1 a small fart and every ones dead
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 12
United States 168
New Zealand 10
unknown 4

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

977 users are online: 977 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49129
Welcome our newest member, softhealertech
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM