![:foreveralone: :foreveralone:](/images/Smileys/foreveralone.gif)
Why should 17P cost fuel and cannot shoot through wall?
![avatar of Porygon](/images/avatars/uberkubel.png?updated=1414778283)
Posts: 2779
![:foreveralone: :foreveralone:](/images/Smileys/foreveralone.gif)
![avatar of DeC](/images/avatars/april14_09.png?updated=1398148416)
Posts: 102
![avatar of luvnest](/uploads/avatar/9686.jpg?updated=1411856398)
![Strategist Badge](/images/badges/badge_STRATEGIST.png)
![Patrion 3](/images/badges/crowdfunding/patron_3.png)
Posts: 1094 | Subs: 20
![avatar of Rollo](/uploads/avatar/10093.jpg?updated=1441236159)
Posts: 738
17pdr could use a decrease in price and popcap though.
![avatar of Rocket](/uploads/avatar/11203.png?updated=1406316720)
Posts: 728
![avatar of Iron Emperor](/uploads/avatar/9775.jpg?updated=1431089651)
Posts: 1653
I would rather decrease the MP cost of Pak43 and the LeFH and add a fuel cost to be in line with the Brits emplacements.
It would be unfair for an fuel stared or better said fuel penaltied faction as the OKW to do that. I'd earlier want to see a fuel decrease or removal
![avatar of BlackKorp](/uploads/avatar/8234.jpg?updated=1491300971)
Posts: 974 | Subs: 2
I would rather decrease the MP cost of Pak43 and the LeFH and add a fuel cost to be in line with the Brits emplacements.
But the Brit's one is also non doctrinal
![;) ;)](/images/Smileys/wink.gif)
![avatar of Katitof](/images/avatars/partisan_at.png?updated=1414778183)
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
But the Brit's one is also non doctrinal
Ost ostwind and OKW ostwind cost the same, one is doctrinal one is not.
OKW one isn't cheaper because its doctrinal.
Just saying somewhat related example for the argument.
![avatar of Mittens](/uploads/avatar/10670.jpg?updated=1450549037)
![Donator 1](/images/badges/crowdfunding/donator_1.png)
Posts: 1276
![avatar of Maschinengewehr](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 334
Using the 17pdr's garrison bonus alongside the Command Vehicle's current aura buff, it makes the 17pdr shoot at a ridiculously fast rate. It shoots so fast that the reload animation only half completes before it shoots again haha.
![avatar of Rekkettenn](/images/avatars/grenadier.png?updated=1394378846)
Posts: 76
![avatar of BlackKorp](/uploads/avatar/8234.jpg?updated=1491300971)
Posts: 974 | Subs: 2
Ost ostwind and OKW ostwind cost the same, one is doctrinal one is not.
OKW one isn't cheaper because its doctrinal.
Just saying somewhat related example for the argument.
#game mechanics #faction design
![:thumb: :thumb:](/images/Smileys/thumb.gif)
![avatar of SirRaven of Coventry](/uploads/avatar/16025.png?updated=1441984003)
Posts: 167
Permanently Banned![avatar of Robbie_Rotten](/images/avatars/stuart.png?updated=1440837451)
![Donator 1](/images/badges/crowdfunding/donator_1.png)
Posts: 412
Especially after brace nerf.
![avatar of Plaguer](/uploads/avatar/10790.jpg?updated=1485952929)
Posts: 498
And about the 17p emplacement, it doesn't bleed MP when hit with most indirect, doesn't really require to have a reinforcement spot next to it, can take a ST shot to the face without getting destroyed (Pak43 can't survive a AVRE shot for comparison), and it has brace to take even less dmg from any sort of attack
These two are so differently designed that they shouldn't be compared imo
The only thing they should change about the Pak43 is the veterancy, it gets vet way too quickly
![avatar of RMMLz](/uploads/avatar/9232.jpg?updated=1429023698)
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
pak 43 can get decrewed by a summer breeze. From my understanding, 17 pounder can't get decrewed that quickly.
This. If you add fuel price, then PAK should resist against heavy bombardment and crew should be un-sniprable.
![avatar of UGBEAR](/uploads/avatar/6464.jpg?updated=1372396625)
Posts: 954
![avatar of Australian Magic](/uploads/avatar/9727.png?updated=1475048234)
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
With today's brace nerf its going to be useless. Just force to brace, wait for cooldown and kill with anything cause you wont be able to repair under mortars or leig fire.
And that pop cap
![:foreveralone: :foreveralone:](/images/Smileys/foreveralone.gif)
![avatar of Arclyte](/uploads/avatar/11055.jpg?updated=1431619362)
Posts: 692
![avatar of MoerserKarL](/images/avatars/panzeriv.png?updated=1440837474)
![Donator 2](/images/badges/crowdfunding/donator_2.png)
Posts: 1108
pak 43 can get decrewed by a summer breeze. From my understanding, 17 pounder can't get decrewed that quickly.
+1 a small fart and every ones dead
Livestreams
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
7 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
261 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
20 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
13 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
6 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.41662.870+14
- 2.659233.739+2
- 3.299158.654+3
- 4.286110.722-2
- 5.309114.730+5
- 6.12243.739-1
- 7.193100.659+3
- 8.10829.788+9
- 9.370283.567+3
- 10.1171650.643+2
Replay highlight
-
cblanco ★
-
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel
-
Heartless Jäger
![Einhoven Country](/images/maps/4p_enhoven_country.jpg)
![Honor](/images/buttons/HONOR_icon.png)
![Download](/images/buttons/DOWNLOAD_icon.png)
Board Info
18 posts in the last week
45 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Wnukowskit
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM