Login

russian armor

Rear echelons shouldn't be able to pick up any base upgrades

DeC
14 Sep 2015, 10:55 AM
#1
avatar of DeC

Posts: 102

Just watched a live game and witnessed some cheesy comdey (sprice), REs with double bars wiping out falls, obers. Imagine how broken it would become if ostruppen were allowed to upgrade to lmg34/stg44.


Reduce their cost but change their 'pickup-slot' number to 0.
14 Sep 2015, 10:58 AM
#2
14 Sep 2015, 10:59 AM
#3
avatar of Bad_Vader

Posts: 88 | Subs: 1

Ah...NO
That's like complaining that a blob of PG shreks can kill Allied tanks way too fast.
14 Sep 2015, 11:00 AM
#4
avatar of TheMux2

Posts: 139

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 10:55 AMDeC
Just watched a live game and witnessed some cheesy comdey (sprice), REs with double bars wiping out falls, obers. Imagine how broken it would become if ostruppen were allowed to upgrade to lmg34/stg44.


Reduce their cost but change their 'pickup-slot' number to 0.


L2P rear echelon are fine. Dont gimp USF even more
14 Sep 2015, 11:05 AM
#5
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

100 mp res lol
14 Sep 2015, 11:10 AM
#6
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

That's not a good fix because it limits other plays. What could be done instead is increase their upkeep or reinforcement cost so that they can't take 10 casualties every fight and still float 1000 manpower. Alternatively, they could just make it so that BAR / M1919 are less effective on them.
DeC
14 Sep 2015, 11:29 AM
#7
avatar of DeC

Posts: 102

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 11:00 AMTheMux2


Dont gimp USF even more
The recent "USHF woe is me" attitude does not justify this exploit.
14 Sep 2015, 11:46 AM
#10
avatar of CaptainSPrice

Posts: 182 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
Dec you should know USF is underperforming with manpower income and Rifflemans eating too much manpower to reinforce - i just change tactic to become for me --- better economy and effective Kappa
14 Sep 2015, 11:48 AM
#11
avatar of van Voort
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 11:29 AMDeC
The recent "USHF woe is me" attitude does not justify this exploit.


"Exploit" is not "someone doing something I don't like"
DeC
14 Sep 2015, 11:53 AM
#12
avatar of DeC

Posts: 102

@SpRice; Yo no offense man. I am not criticizing your play style. But form what I observed it was not alright. In general ,cheap ass units using potent upgrades is not fine.
14 Sep 2015, 12:09 PM
#13
avatar of Trubbbel

Posts: 721

I don't see anything wrong with it at all. It's good echelons have a way to stay in the game. They are still weak although bars are good.
14 Sep 2015, 13:10 PM
#14
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

USF is boring as hell, you are gonna limit them even more? RETs are fine, and their vet which gives them accuracy is also fine. USF needs more options not less.

They also don't have any combat utility (Nade, smoke etc) and a single MG will pin them down.
14 Sep 2015, 13:10 PM
#15
avatar of Nabarxos

Posts: 392

nerf Rear echelons.......

HA HA HA

whats next??
14 Sep 2015, 13:33 PM
#16
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

this is almost as obvious as bait can get
14 Sep 2015, 13:48 PM
#17
avatar of newvan

Posts: 354

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 11:53 AMDeC
@SpRice; Yo no offense man. I am not criticizing your play style. But form what I observed it was not alright. In general ,cheap ass units using potent upgrades is not fine.

How about shreks on volks? Volks are cheap and shreks are potent upgrade, very potent. Or double standards again?
14 Sep 2015, 14:17 PM
#18
avatar of Pedro_Jedi

Posts: 543

Using RE's as mainline infatry is a nice strategy. It allows a lot of manpower that can be used for cashes, FP's, weapon upgrades and other stuff. It's used by many a good player, specially to take the enemy by surprise - it too allows unprecedented capping power. Considering USF's prodigal weakness to late game, I think it's OK. It's better than vehicles crew's exploit, at least. :)
14 Sep 2015, 14:22 PM
#19
avatar of ferwiner
Donator 11

Posts: 2885


jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 11:53 AMDeC
@SpRice; Yo no offense man. I am not criticizing your play style. But form what I observed it was not alright. In general ,cheap ass units using potent upgrades is not fine.



jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 13:48 PMnewvan

How about shreks on volks? Volks are cheap and shreks are potent upgrade, very potent. Or double standards again?


Grens are also prety cheap, accessible and have such a powerfull upgrade that players build them even one hour into the game Kappa
14 Sep 2015, 14:26 PM
#20
avatar of kamk
Donator 11

Posts: 764

this is almost as obvious as bait can get

^ sums it up.

Nothing good will come from a troll topic.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

912 users are online: 912 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
10 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50026
Welcome our newest member, cpbigshipnet
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM