Login

russian armor

Centaur

PAGES (10)down
27 Sep 2015, 22:34 PM
#121
avatar of Mr.Deeds

Posts: 105



Let's do this, Bring Centaur to Ostwind level, but with slower speed, no armor and of course more expensive.


Love how Axis thing "my units should always be better than allied counterpart"

Centaur is slow as hell, have no AT capability unles you just show your rear armor, have a PIV and make it attack ground.


Except it does have some AT capability. It can mow down light vehicles and and penetrate the PIV from behind and sometimes from the front.

If you have any setup teams in buildings they will be instagibbed, much faster than ever flamethrowers.
They will wipe infantry even if you instantly retreat them. They can just move A move against multiple AT guns no problem.

They are fucking ridiculous and you are a fanboy if you don't see that. It has nothing to do with Axis units always being better.
27 Sep 2015, 23:22 PM
#122
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

have a PIV and make it attack ground.


The new Shocks in an M3 :snfPeter:
27 Sep 2015, 23:50 PM
#123
avatar of CavFra

Posts: 52



Failfish at quoting. That was my response.

PD: someone said they ninja change the mines profiles, so they MIGHT have reason to complain again about them.


I see. But no, there are no reasons to complain about mines, if you step on them it is your fault, you can't blame the game.



Sir Raven: pls let me spread salt and troll in peace, I am not being harmful anyway.
28 Sep 2015, 04:46 AM
#124
avatar of Keaper!
Donator 11

Posts: 135

Yea Centaur is definitely overperforming, I don't think anyone would argue otherwise. I think a fuel increase to 125 or so combined with decreased damage against team weapons/AT guns through target tables should make it ok. Oh and fix the damage against units in garrison of course.
28 Sep 2015, 06:48 AM
#125
avatar of SirRaven of Coventry

Posts: 167

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post27 Sep 2015, 23:50 PMCavFra


I see. But no, there are no reasons to complain about mines, if you step on them it is your fault, you can't blame the game.


There is a reason when brit tanks drive over tellers and don't detonate them.


jump backJump back to quoted post27 Sep 2015, 23:50 PMCavFra

Sir Raven: pls let me spread salt and troll in peace, I am not being harmful anyway.


You add flavour to my thread, I wouldn't have it any other way:hansWUT:
28 Sep 2015, 10:35 AM
#126
avatar of Flying Dustbin

Posts: 270 | Subs: 1

If the Centaur gets nerfed damage or whatever then please make it faster at least, Relic.
It is terribly slow and I hate it.
28 Sep 2015, 11:03 AM
#127
avatar of The amazing Chandler

Posts: 1355

its ridiculous to say the least


+1

At the moment it is THE "game breaking" Unit.
28 Sep 2015, 11:06 AM
#128
avatar of atouba

Posts: 482

Also the Centaur comes out way too quick.

You want to build a Centaur,you need 30+115+100-20=225fuel(if rush)
You want bo build an Ostwind,you need 10+40+20+45+75+100-20=270fuel(no 222/251)
28 Sep 2015, 11:08 AM
#129
avatar of sigah

Posts: 100

Yeah, Centaur is the most overperforming unit in the game imho.
I hope relic will bring it in line with Ostwind.
28 Sep 2015, 11:27 AM
#130
avatar of eebies

Posts: 67

The Centaur is very badly balanced.

The best way to get this changed is to prove it's imbalanced to Relic.

The best way to prove the Centaur's imbalance to Relic is through heinous, ceaseless abuse.

Please, for the good of the game and this community, abuse your Centaurs. :sibToxic:

28 Sep 2015, 11:49 AM
#131
avatar of RedT3rror

Posts: 747 | Subs: 2

What's making it so hard to get JP4 or a StuG?
28 Sep 2015, 12:25 PM
#132
avatar of Barantah
Donator 22

Posts: 90

What's making it so hard to get JP4 or a StuG?


Dunno, Just too hard for axis to get easy strat aka sniper 222 for Osth or LeIG retard gun into JPIV....Wich as no counter as UKF.


But no UKF is op faction with OP units.

This game strat to disgust me...

As I said many times, if you let UKF have tanks, you're noob. You will ruin them easily early game without effort (LeIG + snipers)

28 Sep 2015, 12:28 PM
#133
avatar of SirRaven of Coventry

Posts: 167

Permanently Banned
What's making it so hard to get JP4 or a StuG?


Jp4 is 400 mp and 140 fuel, which is harsh with fuel penalty.

Stug requires t3, but ostheer can't go without t2 and 320 mp expensive pak 40, so stug will take you some time. Meanwhile, centaur is achievable even when you are on the backfoot
28 Sep 2015, 12:31 PM
#134
avatar of Chet

Posts: 46

Making a centaur is as close to playing with cheats (besides air supremacy) in coh2 as it gets to be honest.

Ez mode, good to see aimstrong and co abuse it in every match which at least proves its foolishness.
28 Sep 2015, 12:56 PM
#135
avatar of Iron Emperor

Posts: 1653

I've took it out already so many times. Perhaps nerf it's dps, since they kill everything faster than an Ost could ever do.
28 Sep 2015, 13:02 PM
#136
avatar of voltardark

Posts: 976

It's a really good unit. Maybe the best anti-inf weapon. I call it a feature of the Brit army as the tigers are to the Axis. Asymmetric balance : Its what make COH2 interesting.

Normally a Panzer 4 or a Stug should be able to get ride of it, if not make it happen as it need a hard counter as all other units. But don't nerf it!
28 Sep 2015, 13:03 PM
#137
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

What's making it so hard to get JP4 or a StuG?

The denial that stalling for tiger/going shwerer isn't the first and best option to do now.
28 Sep 2015, 13:06 PM
#138
avatar of RedT3rror

Posts: 747 | Subs: 2



Jp4 is 400 mp and 140 fuel, which is harsh with fuel penalty.

Stug requires t3, but ostheer can't go without t2 and 320 mp expensive pak 40, so stug will take you some time. Meanwhile, centaur is achievable even when you are on the backfoot


OKW has 0 tech cost for that JP4. It should be on the field even before the Centaur. (2/3 fuel rate included)

Against Brits, Ostheer can actually skip T2 since they have no light armor (AEC having hardly any AI capabilities, and Bren can be scared off with MGs).

Btw: Ost needs 250 fuel for first StuG (skipping t2). Brits need about 220 fuel for first Centaur (without upgrades). The Ostheer early game advantage should easily make up for that difference.

It's like playing against OKW. You think you have outplayed them and then they come back.
28 Sep 2015, 13:16 PM
#140
avatar of SirRaven of Coventry

Posts: 167

Permanently Banned


OKW has 0 tech cost for that JP4. It should be on the field even before the Centaur. (2/3 fuel rate included)

Against Brits, Ostheer can actually skip T2 since they have no light armor (AEC having hardly any AI capabilities, and Bren can be scared off with MGs).

Btw: Ost needs 250 fuel for first StuG (skipping t2). Brits need about 230 fuel for first Centaur (without upgrades). The Ostheer early game advantage should easily make up for that difference.

It's like playing against OKW. You think you have outplayed them and then they come back.


Lol
PAGES (10)down
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

799 users are online: 799 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49084
Welcome our newest member, sunwingamescom1
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM