Login

russian armor

UKF - Know your units - .Emplacements

30 Jul 2015, 22:10 PM
#22
avatar of MajorBloodnok
Admin Red  Badge
Patrion 314

Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9

Give it a break please?... Or shall we start forwarding the images with your names to Relic for approval, or otherwise?



30 Jul 2015, 22:10 PM
#23
avatar of Pinguino132

Posts: 17

It seems to still be under NDA, sorry please delete this.
30 Jul 2015, 22:15 PM
#24
avatar of MarcoRossolini

Posts: 1042

"Abilities:

Fire Flare – Fire a flare at the target location to gain sight."

An AT gun which can spot for itself and can fire through buildings... I'm worried this might be a bad idea...
30 Jul 2015, 22:18 PM
#25
avatar of Jadame!

Posts: 1122

I think it would be very hard to balance emplacements between being completely useless and being completely broken.

30 Jul 2015, 22:51 PM
#26
avatar of The Big Red 1

Posts: 758

when will the vid for the emplacements be up? i look forward to seeing it in action admins and moderators. =)
31 Jul 2015, 00:08 AM
#27
avatar of ThoseDeafMutes

Posts: 1026

"Abilities:

Fire Flare – Fire a flare at the target location to gain sight."

An AT gun which can spot for itself and can fire through buildings... I'm worried this might be a bad idea...


400mp / 75 fuel is pretty steep for an AT gun especially one that is probably hard countered by ost turbomortars. We'll have to see what its like on launch.
31 Jul 2015, 00:22 AM
#28
avatar of The Big Red 1

Posts: 758

the emplacements made me think of this. brits are gonna need some serious hardware if they are gonna take on the axis cuz they got all the good stuff to themselves
31 Jul 2015, 08:57 AM
#29
avatar of Mithiriath
Director of Social Media Badge

Posts: 830 | Subs: 3

31 Jul 2015, 09:25 AM
#30
avatar of Kreatiir

Posts: 2819

Daaamn.. can't wait for these units.
Looks super cool.
31 Jul 2015, 09:32 AM
#31
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

"Abilities:

Fire Flare – Fire a flare at the target location to gain sight."

An AT gun which can spot for itself and can fire through buildings... I'm worried this might be a bad idea...


Where did you get the idea that it can shoot through buildings?
31 Jul 2015, 09:37 AM
#32
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



Where did you get the idea that it can shoot through buildings?


Probably from the "piercing shot" ability.
Its definitely not armor piercing, because that is the whole point of 17 pounder.
31 Jul 2015, 11:33 AM
#33
avatar of ThoseDeafMutes

Posts: 1026

jump backJump back to quoted post31 Jul 2015, 09:37 AMKatitof


Probably from the "piercing shot" ability.
Its definitely not armor piercing, because that is the whole point of 17 pounder.


I can't believe they passed up the opportunity to call it APDS tho
31 Jul 2015, 11:42 AM
#34
avatar of Corsin

Posts: 600


currently axis are still hogging and hoarding all of the best AT, armor and infantry in-game so i expect the brits to be on par with the axis because in most auto-matches with players i've seen with my own two eyes at least 70% want to play axis more than allies


Wrong...

Search Rates and Faction Preference: Example: 4,000 people are in game and 500 people are searching, 400 are searching for Axis and 100 for Allies. Therefore what the search percentage shows is 80% searching for Axis and 20% searching for Allies. So 80% of people are not IN A GAME as Axis, 50% are and the other 50% are in game as Allies. Overall 2,400 people are playing/want to play as Axis, and 2,100 are playing/want to play as Allies. So the actual faction preference for Axis is 53%, not 80%.


Please stop acting like a pratt to everyone who prefers the axis faction on these forums...

Thanks.
31 Jul 2015, 11:46 AM
#35
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702

jump backJump back to quoted post31 Jul 2015, 11:42 AMCorsin


Wrong...

Search Rates and Faction Preference: Example: 4,000 people are in game and 500 people are searching, 400 are searching for Axis and 100 for Allies. Therefore what the search percentage shows is 80% searching for Axis and 20% searching for Allies. So 80% of people are not IN A GAME as Axis, 50% are and the other 50% are in game as Allies. Overall 2,400 people are playing/want to play as Axis, and 2,100 are playing/want to play as Allies. So the actual faction preference for Axis is 53%, not 80%.


Please stop acting like a pratt to everyone who prefers the axis faction on these forums...

Thanks.



Complete bullshit. Go to the live games, and you can see the total amount of games being played at a current time. The number of players playing automatch is nowhere near that. I doubt the number of players playing at any given time even reaches 400.
31 Jul 2015, 11:48 AM
#36
avatar of Corsin

Posts: 600

jump backJump back to quoted post31 Jul 2015, 11:46 AMBurts



Complete bullshit. Go to the live games, and you can see the total amount of games being played at a current time. The number of players playing automatch is nowhere near that. I doubt the number of players playing at any given time even reaches 400.


Its an example

Even if theres 400 ingame theres still only around 20 in que. so the point still stands.
31 Jul 2015, 11:48 AM
#37
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702

jump backJump back to quoted post31 Jul 2015, 11:48 AMCorsin


Its an example

Even if theres 400 ingame theres still only around 20 in que. so the point still stands.



It doesn't really. We dont know the numbers.
31 Jul 2015, 11:51 AM
#38
avatar of Corsin

Posts: 600

jump backJump back to quoted post31 Jul 2015, 11:48 AMBurts



It doesn't really. We dont know the numbers.


Its not hard to work out tbh. Axis, then que as allies, when allies jumps from 10% to 20% means theres 10 of you in que... which is a small portion of the 400 ingame.
31 Jul 2015, 12:20 PM
#39
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1


hell yesz the 17pdr is back! just as I predicted =). axis fanboys with their more-bang-for-their-buck tanks wont be happy when they see this emplacement being built on the map. That things a REAL tank killer after all it was the brits 88.


I think the tears will be for its users. Exposed to every balistic on the map + Sturmtiger. Lol. You will see then why PAK43 is not OP. :D
31 Jul 2015, 12:41 PM
#40
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post31 Jul 2015, 12:20 PMJohnnyB


I think the tears will be for its users. Exposed to every balistic on the map + Sturmtiger. Lol. You will see then why PAK43 is not OP. :D


You're making a healthy assumption that it doesn't have defensive mechanics against these.
I highly advise you to reread its first ability on the screenshot :sibHyena:
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

549 users are online: 549 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49852
Welcome our newest member, vn88company
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM