Flacktrack
Posts: 247 | Subs: 2
But the major problem is the overperformance of M5 Quad against light vehicles. It destroys Flaktracks, FHTs, 222s and stuff in 1,5 salvos.
Posts: 262
A move and it sets up on the move, try this
Unreliable, because it keeps moving forward while it is setting up, good way to lose a HT if u let it go far but if u stop it then setup restarts, and that is risk too, if u pick specific target to shoot at first, it resets the set up again.
Posts: 122 | Subs: 2
Unreliable, because it keeps moving forward while it is setting up, good way to lose a HT if u let it go far but if u stop it then setup restarts, and that is risk too, if u pick specific target to shoot at first, it resets the set up again.
You can tell it to move to a safe location and attack ground near the safe location. It'll still setup while moving. Just hit "Stop" once its setup and it'll change to real targets.
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
I think it should act as a crowd control unit instead of finishing off infantry. IMO its damage needs a huge nerf, but also a price buff so it acts as a more expensive and better armored Kuble for mid/late game blobs.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Seriously alex... one thing correct.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
You can tell it to move to a safe location and attack ground near the safe location. It'll still setup while moving. Just hit "Stop" once its setup and it'll change to real targets.
Just do this guys.
Abusing bugs isn't part of balance and should not be considered in a balance argument...
When that specific bug is perform by doing something as simple as moving a unit with attack command, i'll consider it an overlooked feature (same with popcap as USF).
When it hasn't been fixed for 6+ months you can consider it part of the unit.
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
Posts: 1891
They go LT>build Flaktrack
They go CPT>build Puma
I agree that vs Sovs Flaktrack is very risky, but idk what to say.
Posts: 110
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Puma have 400 health.
Seriously alex... one thing correct.
Then give it 400 health like the Puma. Alternatively give both 480 health
Posts: 1439
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
How about we don't change what isn't broken?
So it isn't broken Flaktraks hit the field exactly the same time as Stuarts and M5RapeMounts do?
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
I didn't like it from the beginning. I shreds everyone and everything. Wipes units like crazy and insta-pins. On the other hand, it's window of action is very limited, and should be positioned very well.
I think it should act as a crowd control unit instead of finishing off infantry. IMO its damage needs a huge nerf, but also a price buff so it acts as a more expensive and better armored Kuble for mid/late game blobs.
It basically used to. Then squad-bunching happened and now it's liable to wipe by the second volley.
TL;DR FUCKING INFANTRY BUNCHING again.
I remember being quite shocked to see it pin squads nigh-instantly when that patch happened. It definitely used to just suppress squads that were more spread out.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
So it isn't broken Flaktraks hit the field exactly the same time as Stuarts and M5RapeMounts do?
What about JPIV hitting field before Sherman? By that logic, JPIV is broken as well.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
What about JPIV hitting field before Sherman? By that logic, JPIV is broken as well.
JPIV's can't stun Shermans to death. Also yeah it's a lot easier to keep a sherman alive that can shoot and move than a Flaktrack which is forced to set up before it can even shoot back.
Just increasing the health of the Flaktrack would make it more attractive and actually give it a chance to stick around instead of instantly dying the minute a medium hits the field or pathing fucks up and kills you while keeping it from coming to early.
400 or 480 health seems fine.
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
It basically used to. Then squad-bunching happened and now it's liable to wipe by the second volley.
TL;DR FUCKING INFANTRY BUNCHING again.
I remember being quite shocked to see it pin squads nigh-instantly when that patch happened. It definitely used to just suppress squads that were more spread out.
That's one reason, yes. Although they changes more than that and if you remember, it used to miss and hit the terrain a lot. But at the current state, I think they should reduce the damage at least to half.
Posts: 836 | Subs: 5
Whats FUBARed everything is the lol mount coming out at sub-7 minutes, which funnily enough counters Flak HTs, 222s, and even damaged pumas.
Its like the launch AA halftrack for USF all over again, but worse since it can reinforce. Just keep an infantry squad behind it while it flanks a pak, decrews it, then goes to rundown an mg42. Two free team weapons, no need to retreat the squad since you reinforce in the field.
IMO, a unit that is AA, Light AT, AI, suppression, mobile reinforcement, comes out at sub 7 minutes, and is cheap as chips to rebuild (excluding munitions) is more broken than the launch TA.
Posts: 2053
Nothing needs to change about the flak track, everything was completely fine with it pre patch.
Whats FUBARed everything is the lol mount coming out at sub-7 minutes, which funnily enough counters Flak HTs, 222s, and even damaged pumas.
Its like the launch AA halftrack for USF all over again, but worse since it can reinforce. Just keep an infantry squad behind it while it flanks a pak, decrews it, then goes to rundown an mg42. Two free team weapons, no need to retreat the squad since you reinforce in the field.
IMO, a unit that is AA, Light AT, AI, suppression, mobile reinforcement, comes out at sub 7 minutes, and is cheap as chips to rebuild (excluding munitions) is more broken than the launch TA.
^^^
Quadmount upgrade moved to T4, since its always useful because of AA, reinforcement capabilities, and its ability to harrass infantry very well. Removing the previous damage and suppression buff wont change much because of the timing change.
But for USF, i dont know. I guess mines/raketen/schrecks will have to do for stuart...
Posts: 1439
So it isn't broken Flaktraks hit the field exactly the same time as Stuarts and M5RapeMounts do?
How about different response to different battlefield situations? Going flacktruck against Stuart is stupid. It's OK for OKW to not build Flacktruck every game.
Livestreams
64 | |||||
4 | |||||
277 | |||||
28 | |||||
25 | |||||
18 | |||||
8 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.917405.694+1
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Harda621
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM