Soviets May or May Not Be OP
Posts: 176
Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2
Posts: 670
Posts: 262
They are either UP or OP.
or they aren't UP or OP.
Posts: 176
How the hell are we supposed to answer OP or UP with answers yes or no, are you autistic?
No no, you see it goes like this, you can vote either:
1. Yes, Soviets are OP or UP.
or
2. No, Soviets are not OP or UP.
It's your reading comprehension which is malfunctioning here, not my autism.
Posts: 670
No no, you see it goes like this, you can vote either:
1. Yes, Soviets are OP or UP.
or
2. No, Soviets are not OP or UP.
It's your reading comprehension which is malfunctioning here, not my autism.
Thread name: Soviets May or May Not Be OP
Alright...
Posts: 1248
Posts: 1891
Posts: 589
Posts: 1124
Posts: 176
This is stupid
Congratulations, you got the point.
Posts: 9
Posts: 2779
Posts: 987
No no, you see it goes like this, you can vote either:
1. Yes, Soviets are OP or UP.
or
2. No, Soviets are not OP or UP.
It's your reading comprehension which is malfunctioning here, not my autism.
Your ability to write coherently is low.
"Are Soviets balanced, yes or no?" is what you ought to have written (if you aren't simply trolling the community). Don't confuse autism with simple stupidity.
Is this thread a cry for attention because people stopped reading the uninformed opinions you throw against players who know a great deal more than you?
Posts: 176
Your ability to write coherently is low.
"Are Soviets balanced, yes or no?" is what you ought to have written (if you aren't simply trolling the community). Don't confuse autism with simple stupidity.
Is this thread a cry for attention because people stopped reading the uninformed opinions you throw against players who know a great deal more than you?
The whole thread is a joke, man. I saw three different threads all with the title of "Soviets are [OP/UP/Alittle OP]" and thought to myself: "this is ridiculous, it hasn't even been a week."
It's satire, parody, a highlighting of the ridiculousness of the time!
As to your last question... let's keep it constructive, okay?
Posts: 446 | Subs: 2
[[[[[poopposts loudly]]]]]
Posts: 2779
The whole thread is a joke, man. I saw three different threads all with the title of "Soviets are [OP/UP/Alittle OP]" and thought to myself: "this is ridiculous, it hasn't even been a week."
It's satire, parody, a highlighting of the ridiculousness of the time!
As to your last question... let's keep it constructive, okay?
Let's keep it constructive, on a very meaningful thread, sure.
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Posts: 446 | Subs: 2
Well, you can try to construct or destruct on the point presented: "it's too early to say OP or UP / everyone who's said it so far is wrong"
Let's keep it constructive, on a very meaningful thread, sure.
Personally, I'm not a fan of arbitrary time restrictions on judgement, so that line of thinking looks down on the human ability to analyze, but I don't know the particulars of Sov being OP or UP or balanced this patch.
Posts: 3293
also alot of flame posting please don't.
Livestreams
322 | |||||
20 | |||||
6 | |||||
3 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.602215.737+17
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1109614.644+10
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.261137.656+2
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM