Login

russian armor

Patch notes for 23rd June

PAGES (33)down
18 Jun 2015, 09:26 AM
#341
avatar of KurtWilde
Donator 11

Posts: 440



2 Panthers cost as much as six T34/85's, doesn't that seem a tad wrong to you?


I was ANSWERING JB. Read my answer right above.

AND btw Two Panthers DON'T equal SIX T34/85s. Jesus. Six T34/85s cost 780 fuel. So two and a half T34/85s maybe (without tech costs) With tech costs its about four T 34/85s (two panthers with tech 535 (skipping T3 building). You can also get a Tiger with what is left
18 Jun 2015, 09:28 AM
#342
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



2 Panthers cost as much as six T34/85's, doesn't that seem a tad wrong to you?


(175*2)+130 for BPs+55 for buildings as you'll be skipping T3=(260*3)

505=780

#alexmath



18 Jun 2015, 09:29 AM
#343
avatar of KurtWilde
Donator 11

Posts: 440



penetration is better, those are better stats. I can read :)

Got the damage wrong though, my bad! :megusta:


:)
18 Jun 2015, 09:35 AM
#344
avatar of Hater

Posts: 493

Did i get right that panzerfaust won't more do engine damage for full-health T-34?
18 Jun 2015, 09:40 AM
#345
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Jun 2015, 09:35 AMHater
Did i get right that panzerfaust won't more do engine damage for full-health T-34?

Yes. Mediums and heavies no longer will run with tail between their threads when basic infantry troop walks their direction.
18 Jun 2015, 09:45 AM
#346
avatar of Squeaky Door 96

Posts: 192

Permanently Banned


You said the Soviet player can field 6 T34/85s when you could field one Tiger. If THAT was the case you had been outplayed severely, as he has had access to a lot of fuel and excess manpower.

I brought up the two panthers scenario, to illustrate what you COULD have done, if you were NOT completely outplayed and is sitting on a lot of resources, equal to the resources the Soviet player who fielded SIC T34/85s.

So either you didn't read what I said or you are intentionally diverting.



you forget that ostheer teching is expensive, soviets need not to tech any further than at nades and at guns and (which they can get in t2 which they can build right away) than safe up for call in t34-85s. Good luck with getting your 2 panthers, they will cost you just as much as 4 t34-85s :wave:
18 Jun 2015, 09:47 AM
#347
avatar of Squeaky Door 96

Posts: 192

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post18 Jun 2015, 09:28 AMKatitof


(175*2)+130 for BPs+55 for buildings as you'll be skipping T3=(260*3)

505=780

#alexmath





Skipping t3 haha, you really want to lose as ostheer don't you

535 is the cost for teching t4 without t3 for ostheer and getting 2 panthers. calling in 4 t34-85s costs 520 fuel. 4 t34-85s will rape 2 panthers.
18 Jun 2015, 09:49 AM
#348
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



you forget that ostheer teching is expensive, soviets need not to tech any further than at nades and at guns and than safe up for call in t34-85s. Good luck with getting your 2 panthers, they will cost you just as much as 4 t34-85s :wave:

I'm rather positive that ost teching doesn't cost 500+ fuel as alex is stubbornly trying to show for some defying any logic and common sense reason.

Also why would you want panther against 34/85?
Have you not read the stug changes? StuG have just become 2nd if not 1st most cost effective TD in game.
Spammable, like alex posts, cheap like tea makers arguments, firepower of SU-85.
Name me ONE reason why you would not want as many of them around your tiger as possible?
18 Jun 2015, 09:50 AM
#349
avatar of Unshavenbackman

Posts: 680

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Jun 2015, 09:35 AMHater
Did i get right that panzerfaust won't more do engine damage for full-health T-34?


This is probably because Relic thought guard motor was to weak, guards are now in demand. A guard-con-combo will be the way to go. As if the options wasnt bad already, my guess is that a lot of players who are using shock rifle (the other option of two) will go guard motor.
18 Jun 2015, 09:51 AM
#350
avatar of Squeaky Door 96

Posts: 192

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post18 Jun 2015, 09:49 AMKatitof

I'm rather positive that ost teching doesn't cost 500+ fuel as alex is stubbornly trying to show for some defying any logic and common sense reason.

Also why would you want panther against 34/85?
Have you not read the stug changes?


4 t34-85s plus marked target is dead stug g. If it makes a tiger useless, you bet stug g won't fair any better.
18 Jun 2015, 09:52 AM
#351
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



4 t34-85s plus marked target is dead stug g. If it makes a tiger useless, you bet stug g won't fair any better.


Don't use single stug against 4 T34/85...?
They are dirt cheap, spam the hell out of them, by the time he'll have 4 85s, you'll have 4-6 StuGs assuming equal map control.
18 Jun 2015, 09:55 AM
#352
avatar of KurtWilde
Donator 11

Posts: 440



you forget that ostheer teching is expensive, soviets need not to tech any further than at nades and at guns and (which they can get in t2 which they can build right away) than safe up for call in t34-85s. Good luck with getting your 2 panthers, they will cost you just as much as 4 t34-85s :wave:


I think i did the whole math thing about two panthers on a previous post. But you don't even need to tech up and get panthers. Stugs are an effective counter to T34/85s now
18 Jun 2015, 09:57 AM
#353
avatar of Squeaky Door 96

Posts: 192

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post18 Jun 2015, 09:52 AMKatitof


Don't use single stug against 4 T34/85...?
They are dirt cheap, spam the hell out of them, by the time he'll have 4 85s, you'll have 4-6 StuGs assuming equal map control.


you don't sayyy. Still won't beat t34-85s, they are higly mobile and have a turret, that togheter with guard spam, at guns and marked target.... I fear for the stug G. But only time can tell
18 Jun 2015, 10:02 AM
#354
avatar of KurtWilde
Donator 11

Posts: 440



you don't sayyy. Still won't beat t34-85s, they are higly mobile and have a turret, that togheter with guard spam, at guns and marked target.... I fear for the stug G. But only time can tell


A Tiger and three Stugs should be able to beat 4 T34/85s. Throw in an AT gun or Two. But really, I have hardly faced four T 34/85s in a 1v1 unless I have done really bad in that match

18 Jun 2015, 10:02 AM
#355
avatar of Unshavenbackman

Posts: 680

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Jun 2015, 00:39 AMCieZ


Following me around shit-posting me just makes you look stupid. Keep trying.

Sure a modder could make these changes to the config file in an hour. Well, not all of them. But that's not the point.

You really don't know what you're talking about.

Edit: I've never called anyone in the community retarded, at least not in this thread anyways.


Lol, as i give a fuck about how i look. This a gamingcommunity not a mirror. I just want a decent game, what your pompous motives are I dont want to know.
18 Jun 2015, 10:03 AM
#356
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1



you don't sayyy. Still won't beat t34-85s, they are higly mobile and have a turret, that togheter with guard spam, at guns and marked target.... I fear for the stug G. But only time can tell


If you think like that all the time, I understand why you need so badly two Tigers to kill two T34-85... And probably why your are losing many of your games.
18 Jun 2015, 10:14 AM
#357
avatar of Zyllen

Posts: 770



you don't sayyy. Still won't beat t34-85s, they are higly mobile and have a turret, that togheter with guard spam, at guns and marked target.... I fear for the stug G. But only time can tell


The su doesnt have unlimited amount of mp or popcap what you are saying is highly unlikely. and you need some practice and planning with the stug perhaps. But after using the jp4 and elephant for so long it has become easy for me. Also during the alpha the stug encountered units that where just as mobile and with better armour and it performed well against these units.

Also keep in mind that a stug nearly has twice the amount of dps as a panther. heat rounds to stun any 85 ( basically is a certain kill if 2 stugs are present)
18 Jun 2015, 10:23 AM
#358
avatar of The amazing Chandler

Posts: 1355

+ 1000 to Ciez an Napalm. Thank you guys for being positive. Seeing the Cap half full and not half emty. Sorry if i forgot anybody else who is trying to help.

To the rest, grow up you little spoiled brats!
And another thing.If you want to leave the game, please just do it but spare us the Info. We don't want to know because we don't care!

Wow, now i feel so much better!
18 Jun 2015, 10:24 AM
#359
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1



I was ANSWERING JB. Read my answer right above.

AND btw Two Panthers DON'T equal SIX T34/85s. Jesus. Six T34/85s cost 780 fuel. So two and a half T34/85s maybe (without tech costs) With tech costs its about four T 34/85s (two panthers with tech 535 (skipping T3 building). You can also get a Tiger with what is left


Oh yes only four t34/85's, the most cost effective medium in the game.

And skipping T3, lmao what planet do you live on were that is a smart idea?
18 Jun 2015, 10:25 AM
#360
avatar of SwonVIP
Donator 11

Posts: 640

Good patch notes... But as an Alpha player Im also a little bit disappointed at the same time.
Hope they will introduce further changes in another patch!

All alpha changes in one big patch would have been great!
PAGES (33)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

653 users are online: 653 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49065
Welcome our newest member, Huhmpal01
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM