Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
The Su76 buff makes sense because the current Su76 is terrible. Everyone knows it.
The Stug G buff makes sense without a range increase so the Su85 and other, more expensive TDs. It's still a massive buff.
T34/85s are a lot easier to deal with than ISUs and IS2s. Especially with Stug G and Raketen buffs.
Posts: 923
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
I didn't expect that the community would blow up so much about this.
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
Yes, that's have that conversation:
A You never see multiple KT in 1v1
B Yes, that's true, but you see them in larger modes
A Well not in 1v1
B Then it makes no difference to you if there's a limit does it?
10 
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
Really?
Cynthia couldn't tell us what her favourite biscuit was without there being a flame war between the Jammy Dodgers and the Chocolate Digestives; meanwhile the Water Biscuits would stand to the side going "You know biscuits don't have to be sweet you know"
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Has this really changed that much other than cementing Guard Motor as the most common Soviet commander?
Posts: 707
Armoured Assault may see a come back, as you can get an IS2 and then loads of T34-85s
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
I love how you bow down (and) for what a modder would do in an hour. And how you keep on telling the community, whos been crying for these changes, how retarded they are. You should rest your tongue boy.
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
I'm fine with multiple KTs.
In fact I think it's balanced. I was supporting the fact that OKW should be allowed to field multiple KTs. They're not as amazing as people make them out to be. Especially compared to IS2s and ISUs.
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
Replay pls.
Inb4 4v4. Yay.
Still an extremely cost-inefficient tank.
 | Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
You mean loads of call-in no-tech bullshit (like any other day in the past 2 years)
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
I gave you a very well constructed argument in another reply, you ingnored that. Apart from that, everyone seems to agree you love Relic with all of your heart. You defending a patch or anything Relic does, is something not to be taken very seriously.
12/10, would argue again
Posts: 707
You missed Soviet Industry, remember that?
Seriously though, Shock Rifle was very good and Armoured Assault was very rare. If it gets it's day in the sun I won't lose any sleep about that, bearing in mind that what you get from it other than the tanks is underwhelming
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
Buffing a unit but sticking it behind a absolute absurd cost or next to a better unit means it will be used just as much as before; IE not at all. Why get an SU-76 if it's in the same tier as a better tank? Why get a StuG III G instead of a PIV and a Pak gun?
The StuG G should have 60 range, if it's a dedicated TD now why doesn't it have dedicated TD range?
1 
Posts: 1838 | Subs: 17
Posts: 192
Permanently Banned
I'm must more critical of Relic than you, or most people realize.
Just because I don't criticize their decisions on public forums, doesn't mean that I don't criticize them.
I give Relic plenty of feedback on places other than CoH2.org - places you probably don't have access to =/
Sorry. Not sorry.
1 Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1166 | Subs: 1
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Really?
 |
|
|
28 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
 |
|
|
17 | ||
 |
|
|
99 | ||
 |
|
|
29 | ||
|
|
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
