Buff kv8 damage.
![avatar of Gluhoman](/uploads/avatar/9498.jpg?updated=1429299208)
Posts: 380
![avatar of newvan](/uploads/avatar/12082.jpg?updated=1434633793)
Posts: 354
![avatar of vasa1719](/uploads/avatar/10039.jpg?updated=1408056701)
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently Banned![avatar of Gluhoman](/uploads/avatar/9498.jpg?updated=1429299208)
Posts: 380
It's fine, for flamer/shitty canon heavy tank and damage isn't important for flamer vs inf, more important is rate of fire and crit chance.You need to ride for the retreating vet gren squad to base, to burn them. Even stug e is better than kv8 with his wipes and cost. So low the cost then.
![avatar of QueenRatchet123](/uploads/avatar/11449.gif?updated=1412752045)
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned![avatar of elchino7](/uploads/avatar/7864.jpg?updated=1488595911)
![Senior Moderator Badge](/images/badges/badge_SENIOR_MODERATOR.png)
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Just like many other units, i'll like seeing the Xp threshold for vet reduce.
![avatar of Snipester](/uploads/avatar/10651.jpg?updated=1610425424)
![Patrion 3](/images/badges/crowdfunding/patron_3.png)
Posts: 102
It's "good" if you go IS2 no tech, if not is kinda meh. Although i'll rather see it adjust a bit, i think people haven't recovered from the stygma of the old KV8.
Just like many other units, i'll like seeing the Xp threshold for vet reduce.
I'll agree with this. Veterancy XP based solely on cost is a bad idea. It should be based more on a reasonable amount of damage a unit can inflict in its intended role.
Right now, KV8 stats are fine. As stated above, flame weapons rely heavily on crit chance to kill infantry. If I remember correctly, the KV8 had its damage nerfed in the first place because it was able to kill OKW trucks too quickly and easily.
If they removed flame crits to make flame weapons more reliable and less RNG dependent, I would agree that it would need a damage buff to perform better vs. infantry, but then it could prove to be too lethal against buildings once again. Might be hard to balance without damage tables.
![avatar of Tea Maker Machine](/uploads/avatar/14178.png?updated=1433952963)
Posts: 270
![avatar of Katitof](/images/avatars/partisan_at.png?updated=1414778183)
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Low armor guarantees ATGs owning it in no time.
Shreck volks tear it apart in seconds.
KV-8 isn't weak, but its extremely squishy for an AI exclusive tank.
![avatar of Unshavenbackman](/uploads/avatar/9438.jpg?updated=1482010350)
Posts: 680
I dunno man. kv8 seems fine
This, but could/should get a costdecrease as its situational.
![avatar of Mr. Someguy](/images/avatars/policefusilier.png?updated=1428069587)
Posts: 4928
KV-8 is hardcountered by units its supposed to hardcounter.
Low armor guarantees ATGs owning it in no time.
Shreck volks tear it apart in seconds.
KV-8 isn't weak, but its extremely squishy for an AI exclusive tank.
AT Guns counter Tank, I don't see any issue with that. Volkschrecks have been an issue since Alpha when Schrecks were taken off Sturmpioneers. And the KV-8 isn't weak, it's only marginally less durable than the Sturmpanzer but it's attack isn't limited to the front. If the certain changes in the alpha go through next patch, this entire discussion may not be valid.
![avatar of daspoulos](/uploads/avatar/10763.jpg?updated=1411438557)
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently Banned![avatar of AchtAchter](/images/avatars/MG_34.png?updated=1428069549)
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Let's buff a doctrine, that is already meta.
![:faint: :faint:](/images/Smileys/sSc_faint.gif)
![avatar of PanzerGeneralForever](/uploads/avatar/5909.jpg?updated=1411283504)
Posts: 1072
Let's buff the KV8 so soviet call ins look even better than they already are.
Let's buff a doctrine, that is already meta.
Seems fair to me
![:) :)](/images/Smileys/smile.gif)
![:D :D](/images/Smileys/biggrin.gif)
It already bounces pak shots alot. If the enemy has no armor on the field hes gonna have alot of units wiped on retreat. I think its a great choice verse CAS because its fast enough to dodge the AT strafe and will likely have no enemy armor it needs to deal with. Wipe his pak guns with everything else the commander has to offer and its GG.
![avatar of daspoulos](/uploads/avatar/10763.jpg?updated=1411438557)
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently Banned
Seems fair to meShock Rifle frontline tactics arent that great after all
It already bounces pak shots alot. If the enemy has no armor on the field hes gonna have alot of units wiped on retreat. I think its a great choice verse CAS because its fast enough to dodge the AT strafe and will likely have no enemy armor it needs to deal with. Wipe his pak guns with everything else the commander has to offer and its GG.
The thing is, if you are going shock rifle. Why not just go is2 at 2 cps later? Getting a kv8 will push back your is2 or remove your reserve fuel you've been floating all game which will prevent you from getting a second is2 5 minutes after your first. The quicker your is2 the better, same rule applies to the second.
![avatar of PanzerGeneralForever](/uploads/avatar/5909.jpg?updated=1411283504)
Posts: 1072
The thing is, if you are going shock rifle. Why not just go is2 at 2 cps later? Getting a kv8 will push back your is2 or remove your reserve fuel you've been floating all game which will prevent you from getting a second is2 5 minutes after your first. The quicker your is2 the better, same rule applies to the second.
I mentioned the enemy went CAS right? IS2 and KV8 are fairly similar in terms of AI capabilites. The IS2 is just harder to kill. Most will pick the safe choice with the IS2 like you said.
![avatar of newvan](/uploads/avatar/12082.jpg?updated=1434633793)
Posts: 354
You need to ride for the retreating vet gren squad to base, to burn them. Even stug e is better than kv8 with his wipes and cost. So low the cost then.
It's really RNG flame crit dependant, it alwayes different. And it's more like Stug E over performing for it's cost, than KV-8 under performing. However buffing KV-8 armor to KV-1 level could be option, it's not some crazy buff for "havy" close combat tank, only +30/+20, but with look at mp cost, cause it's cheaper than KV-1 for 30mp, fuel price is ok.
And maybe... hypothetically... wink-wink, it will be overhaul of all flame based weapons one day.
![avatar of What Doth Life?!](/uploads/avatar/6103.gif?updated=1627104038)
![Patrion 2](/images/badges/crowdfunding/patron_2.png)
Posts: 1664
I would also like to see an acceleration increase at vet 1 instead of being able to cap territory.
![avatar of Sierra](/uploads/avatar/10443.png?updated=1405008070)
Posts: 432
![avatar of JohnnyB](/uploads/avatar/11660.jpg?updated=1488313304)
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
KV-8 is hardcountered by units its supposed to hardcounter.
FHT says hi.
Livestreams
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
29 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
13 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
0 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
253 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
23 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
16 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.41662.870+14
- 2.659233.739+2
- 3.299158.654+3
- 4.286110.722-2
- 5.309114.730+5
- 6.12243.739-1
- 7.193100.659+3
- 8.10829.788+9
- 9.370283.567+3
- 10.1171650.643+2
Replay highlight
-
cblanco ★
-
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel
-
Heartless Jäger
![Einhoven Country](/images/maps/4p_enhoven_country.jpg)
![Honor](/images/buttons/HONOR_icon.png)
![Download](/images/buttons/DOWNLOAD_icon.png)
Board Info
18 posts in the last week
45 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Wnukowskit
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM