If relic goin to nerf soviets I am outa here.
Promise?
T-34 needs a buff
8 Jun 2015, 06:23 AM
#61
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Promise?
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
8 Jun 2015, 09:59 AM
#62
Posts: 17
If relic goin to nerf soviets I am outa here.
SU desperately needs a buff.
You are just a troll.
8 Jun 2015, 11:26 AM
#63
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Cheaper T34/76's
Would make sense...
And /thread
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
8 Jun 2015, 11:41 AM
#64
Posts: 611
The t34 is just bad unit period, making it cheaper or reverting its old rof back isn't going to make it a better tank to use its stuck in a shit tier, with a faction with the worst teching in the game. This just goes back to the fact the soviets need a complete tech over haul
I voted no because buffing a unit from the strongest faction makes no sense even if that unit could be preforming better.
Sov tech is a mess but is supported by excellent callin options. Probably too much work to fix at this stage unfortunately.
8 Jun 2015, 11:53 AM
#65
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
I voted no because buffing a unit from the strongest faction makes no sense even if that unit could be preforming better.
Sov tech is a mess but is supported by excellent callin options. Probably too much work to fix at this stage unfortunately.
really bad logic
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
8 Jun 2015, 12:02 PM
#66
Posts: 611
really bad logic
To you maybe.
Buffing t34 solely without any other changes will simply make sovs stronger.
I can understand those that want to make t3 a viable option but on the other hand given the strength of sov callins it would likely make sovs op.
8 Jun 2015, 12:35 PM
#67
Posts: 770
t-34 is fine. if you compare the stats the t-34 is indeed slightly weaker then the sherman and p4 but not by much. dont expect it to behave like an 85 and it will do well.
That the su need a somewhat better and more mobile TD to counter mediums is a given but the su85 is fine against the slower heavies.
That the su need a somewhat better and more mobile TD to counter mediums is a given but the su85 is fine against the slower heavies.
8 Jun 2015, 13:41 PM
#68
3 
Posts: 545
This game is looking more and more like wolfenstien the new order, the year is 1944 and under deaths head the worst Charlie Chaplin impersonation group in history has king tigers, magic Volkswagens, and lawl rocket halftracks.
The Russians have "combat" engineers, a model of t34 not appropriate to the time period and the glorious benefit of all on map arty being nullified. Lest we forget the su 76. General Strasse would be proud.
Still a good game, jazz hands for patch!!!
The Russians have "combat" engineers, a model of t34 not appropriate to the time period and the glorious benefit of all on map arty being nullified. Lest we forget the su 76. General Strasse would be proud.
Still a good game, jazz hands for patch!!!
8 Jun 2015, 14:02 PM
#69
Posts: 1484
The game already moved the time to 1944, so why not upgrade the gun on the T-34? Relic has so many options to play with this. Also, T-34/76 is a lackluster tank that was relevant BEFORE WFA, now OKW shreks roaming around makes it obsolete. The whole reason why the Soviet meta is solely on Call-ins now.
 | Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
8 Jun 2015, 14:06 PM
#70
Posts: 17
the year is 1944
It's timeline spans across a couple of years not just 1944.
8 Jun 2015, 14:15 PM
#71
3 Posts: 545
Point is MediumGray, it's not too hard to see the factions that have ease of access to the 1944 toys, and those who do not lol.
8 Jun 2015, 15:07 PM
#72
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Point is MediumGray, it's not too hard to see the factions that have ease of access to the 1944 toys, and those who do not lol.
Everything in the Soviet Arsenal including the T34/76 saw use into 1944. Not to mention how old a unit is has zero bearing on how good it is because the KV1 is an excellent tank that can easily beat upgunned PIV's and cause Panthers to panic when used in numbers and it's one of the oldest tanks in the entire game.
8 Jun 2015, 15:11 PM
#73
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
It's timeline spans across a couple of years not just 1944.
1941 soviets with literally THREE 1944 units vs 1944-45 units of three other armies.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
8 Jun 2015, 15:16 PM
#74
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
1941 soviets with literally THREE 1944 units vs 1944-45 units of three other armies.
Ostheer has literally no units from 1945, most of it's units are all from 1943 or before. USF units are all 1942-44, and the only 1945 unit OKW has are IR StG 44's.
EDIT: And again, historic realism/dates has nothing to do with unit performance, so uh.....
8 Jun 2015, 15:19 PM
#75
Posts: 1702
Just because the t-34/76 was obsolete by 1944 has nothing to do with it being total crap in-game.
It's obvious that it needs a buff and nobody reasonable denies it. And it will probaly get a buff.
It's obvious that it needs a buff and nobody reasonable denies it. And it will probaly get a buff.
8 Jun 2015, 15:19 PM
#76
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
1941 soviets with literally THREE 1944 units vs 1944-45 units of three other armies.
don't make me sad..
usf still no have pershing..
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
8 Jun 2015, 16:11 PM
#77
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
Satellite control of demo charge is not really a 1941 or 1944 weapon neither
8 Jun 2015, 16:22 PM
#78
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Satellite control of demo charge is not really a 1941 or 1944 weapon neither
There's a really, really, really, really, really long detonation wire going all the way back to base.
8 Jun 2015, 16:29 PM
#79
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
There's a really, really, really, really, really long detonation wire going all the way back to base.
You mean Speedy Gongalez will connect the wire democharge/base each time a democharge is set ? god damn it Gonzalez ... he is fucking fast ...
8 Jun 2015, 16:54 PM
#80
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
You mean Speedy Gongalez will connect the wire democharge/base each time a democharge is set ? god damn it Gonzalez ... he is fucking fast ...
If I could find a Russian dub of Speedy Gonzales to plop here, I'd have the perfect response.
Unfortunately, I couldn't so, so I don't.
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
27 | ||
 |
|
|
0 | ||
 |
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
 |
|
|
4 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1101614.642+2
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.271108.715+22
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
788 users are online:
1 member and 787 guests
aerafield
aerafield
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49081
Welcome our newest member, kavyashide
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, kavyashide
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM