Login

russian armor

T-34 needs a buff

PAGES (20)down
7 Jun 2015, 09:53 AM
#21
avatar of Butcher

Posts: 1217

Imo the T-34/76 should be switched with the T-34/85. Guards motor now calls in a T-34/76 at about 6 CPs while the T-34/85 can be built for 130 fuel without choosing a doctrine.
7 Jun 2015, 10:03 AM
#22
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

Just give them slightly better AI firepower. Either via buffing the MGs or buffing the main gun by slightly decreasing scatter or slightly changing the AoE profile of the shell so it has a bigger area where it does significant damage to infantry.

There is no need for any other changes as the AT capabilities of the T34/76 are fine at the moment. For this reason, I also disagree with a price drop as it would make the T34/76 vs P4/P5/P6 match-ups imbalanced in the T34/76 favor.
7 Jun 2015, 10:11 AM
#23
avatar of Gluhoman

Posts: 380





Or give its old Ram back, man i miss the old Ramming ability, once i Had a Game there is 12 tanks disabled in a small forest area it start a panther try to flank got Rammed their tank rush to aid and we rammed all 1 by 1 so my teammate and I rammed our 6 T34/76 with 6 P4/Panther and 1 remaining T34/76 is trying to finish the job and both side infantry fighting heavily around it and CE and Pios both try to repair their own tanks under fire and both side is throwing off map art on that small area, it was so fun.
Ehm no, in 2013 it was a ramming machine before a buff, now its a tank that need to fight, but nowadays it's kinda useless because of accuracy and cost. A buff or a cost change will be nice.
7 Jun 2015, 10:27 AM
#24
avatar of l4hti

Posts: 476

Just give "bugged" rof back. Or increase accutary vs infsntry
7 Jun 2015, 10:38 AM
#25
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

Give it better AI in the form of improved MGs or just revert the RoF fix.
7 Jun 2015, 10:44 AM
#26
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

T34/76 it's fine considering price vs performance. Next topic.
7 Jun 2015, 10:59 AM
#27
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617

Imo the T-34/76 should be switched with the T-34/85. Guards motor now calls in a T-34/76 at about 6 CPs while the T-34/85 can be built for 130 fuel without choosing a doctrine.


Sure mate; lets make the soviets even more powerful. Shocks in T0 maybe?
7 Jun 2015, 11:12 AM
#28
avatar of assbag
Donator 22

Posts: 83

Soviets being OP has nothing to do with t-34. If you compare t-34 to p4 or sherman it's just a bad unit. bad vs tanks, bad vs infantry, bad vet, low survivability, not cheap.
7 Jun 2015, 11:34 AM
#29
avatar of Spearhead

Posts: 162

May i add that a buff for the t34 should also effect the kv1. This tank is nearly as expensive as a panther, but is slow as a KT and has zero AI or AT whatsoever:foreveralone:
7 Jun 2015, 11:39 AM
#30
avatar of Butcher

Posts: 1217



Sure mate; lets make the soviets even more powerful. Shocks in T0 maybe?
I think that would actually balance it. The Soviet player would have to build T3 in order to get a T-34/85.

Simply buffing the T-34/76 isn´t right either as that would offset the Panzer IV - T-34/76 balance. The T-34/85 would be more expensive than a buffed T-34/76. But seeing T-34/76 outperforming Panzer IVs would simply be silly. Also the T-34/76 in skilled hands can annihilate infantry, just drive over them.
7 Jun 2015, 11:46 AM
#31
avatar of TheSleep3r

Posts: 670



Sure mate; lets make the soviets even more powerful. Shocks in T0 maybe?


lmao

much of the power of soviet faction is because of t-34/85s, so what would adding them to the tech tree change? a player building many 85s has no fuel for a potential heavy, and there is not such a thing like doctrinal mark target

although guard army having access to worse equipment while being described as 'given the best equipment' is amusing though, not gonna happen imo

honestly i think after 23rd there will be much more different and important problems about soviet armor effectiveness
7 Jun 2015, 12:04 PM
#32
avatar of Bulgakov

Posts: 987



Seriously who need sense here?

Volks popping screck from their ass?
M5 popping up a quad?
Weapon rack is locked forever unless commander approve?
MG34 shooting completely harmless popcorn?
Stuka used to drop fallshimmjager?


+1 :lolol:


I could see the T-34 being a bit cheaper and not destroying the game. but like 5 fuel less and 10MP less.

It's pretty bad unless you have several of them. But I don't know if reducing the cost would break balance.
7 Jun 2015, 14:03 PM
#33
avatar of pussyking
Donator 11

Posts: 551

May i add that a buff for the t34 should also effect the kv1. This tank is nearly as expensive as a panther, but is slow as a KT and has zero AI or AT whatsoever:foreveralone:


Good point. It should get a pen buff
7 Jun 2015, 14:06 PM
#34
avatar of pussyking
Donator 11

Posts: 551



lmao

much of the power of soviet faction is because of t-34/85s, so what would adding them to the tech tree change? a player building many 85s has no fuel for a potential heavy, and there is not such a thing like doctrinal mark target

although guard army having access to worse equipment while being described as 'given the best equipment' is amusing though, not gonna happen imo

honestly i think after 23rd there will be much more different and important problems about soviet armor effectiveness


If relic goin to nerf soviets I am outa here.

SU desperately needs a buff.
7 Jun 2015, 14:47 PM
#35
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617



If relic goin to nerf soviets I am outa here.

I desperately need to L2P.


Fixed for ya!
7 Jun 2015, 15:08 PM
#36
avatar of Spearhead

Posts: 162



Fixed for ya!


You are wrong mate. All accusations of SU being OP derives from GMC/con control in 1v1 and to a degree 2v2. The stock army is just soo subpar to anything else....

On a side note: It's really obsolete to talk about that so close before the patch anyway
7 Jun 2015, 15:13 PM
#37
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702

Those who say that soviets will get nerfed next patch know nothing, just saying :snfPeter:


Either that or they are delusional :snfPeter:



Or maybe they are actually in the actual alpha, not the shit that closed last week :snfPeter:
7 Jun 2015, 15:19 PM
#38
avatar of AchtAchter

Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3

jump backJump back to quoted post7 Jun 2015, 15:13 PMBurts
Those who say that soviets will get nerfed next patch know nothing, just saying :snfPeter:


Either that or they are delusional :snfPeter:



Or maybe they are actually in the actual alpha, not the shit that closed last week :snfPeter:


full denial :snfCHVGame:
7 Jun 2015, 15:26 PM
#39
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702



full denial :snfCHVGame:




Well, there are also those people who think soviets will get nerfed and are happy with the changes..

Too bad they dont really know what the actual imbalances were in the first place :snfPeter:
7 Jun 2015, 15:48 PM
#40
avatar of The_rEd_bEar

Posts: 760

The t34 is just bad unit period, making it cheaper or reverting its old rof back isn't going to make it a better tank to use its stuck in a shit tier, with a faction with the worst teching in the game. This just goes back to the fact the soviets need a complete tech over haul
PAGES (20)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
Last Wednesday, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
Last Wednesday, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
Last Tuesday, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
Last Tuesday, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
Last Tuesday, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

612 users are online: 1 member and 611 guests
twin68woucom
3 posts in the last 24h
14 posts in the last week
73 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53287
Welcome our newest member, twin68woudotcom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM