Posts: 1122
I'll give you the artillery emplacements but if your losing Katyushas to CAS but not priests there might an issue.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Pff, considering how intensive allied late-game in terms of micro it is very hard not to lost them. I can focus on my katys in 3v3/4v4 (never lost them there), to sacrifice little bit of tank and infantry micro, but in 2v2? You cant be serious.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
Are you actually suggesting in the clusterfuck that is the larger game modes were more shit is happening you have to micro less?
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Axis in 3v3 and 4v4 require very little micro and skill
Sorry to break it to u
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
This is the cry of someone who has never played against a high level AT. 1's and 2's are your area of expertise, not 3's and 4's.
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
Are you actually suggesting in the clusterfuck that is the larger game modes were more shit is happening you have to micro less? Regardless losing your mobile rocket trucks to a call in strafe that has a warning really is a micro issue.
Priests are also harder to move and you typically will have them decrewed sitting around anyway.
 | Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
I have.
Axis 9 times outa 10 will win
im not a 1v1 and 2v2 elitist by any means. But EVERY PLAYER needs to play ones. If you dont u will NEVER trully understand factions strengths and weaknesses.
3v3 and 4v4 comp stomp modes will NEVER teach u that.
you have lesser area to cover. thus less micro. that little call in strafe, for how much damage it does and counting the fact that it has no counter, it comes as fast as IR path finder arty.
Posts: 38
Posts: 612
His point is that you should buff Allies resource conversion abilities to be the same instead of removing them from Axis.
This wasn't the case for a good period of time, and we should go back to that period design wise. All fuel points and capture points should be equally able to be contested by the enemy team.
Yes the factions are retardedly designed. Why Allies are best in the early to mid game and Axis best as late game makes no sense when it plays directly against all conventions of skill and tactics.
Team synergy is not the enemy here, the availability of it how ever is. Allies need more tools to enable team work.
Posts: 612
Oh my...
Still butthurt because you lost yesterday's match? I told you 2 weeks before: you spam Cons and Rifles and refuse to play a decent combined arms and I will spam back. And my spamming is superior to yours.
You could have played a decent game there and we would have instantly switched to combined arms ourselves, but we are just sick and tired of this meta-spam-a-move-until-callins-crap.
TLDR: OP doesn't like to get his cheese beaten by counter-cheese.
Just a shame that you try to hide it behind a thread about conversion abilities.
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Oh my...
Still butthurt because you lost yesterday's match? I told you 2 weeks before: you spam Cons and Rifles and refuse to play a decent combined arms and I will spam back. And my spamming is superior to yours.
You could have played a decent game there and we would have instantly switched to combined arms ourselves, but we are just sick and tired of this meta-spam-a-move-until-callins-crap.
TLDR: OP doesn't like to get his cheese beaten by counter-cheese.
Just a shame that you try to hide it behind a thread about conversion abilities.
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Lend Lease really ain't a problem considering it'll just be shoving XP into AA units' mouths when prepared.
Though yeah, Fuel to Muni is a huge problem on CAS.
Posts: 612
I just looove this "Allied bullshit is allowed but Axis' bullshit not" crap.
4 Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
...
Pathfinder artillery is fine, and should remain how it is now just like the CAS doctrine.
And the "less area to cover" doesn't mean much when your using and fighting far more units. It's a different kind of micro, but at the high levels you need it bad.
| Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
4 Posts: 444
And my spamming is superior to yours.
Just a shame that you try to hide it behind a thread about conversion abilities.
| Playercard of Looney | |||||||||||||||||||
|
4 Posts: 444
Pathfinder artillery is fine, and should remain how it is now just like the CAS doctrine.
| Playercard of Looney | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 471 | Subs: 1
Oh my...
Still butthurt because you lost yesterday's match? I told you 2 weeks before: you spam Cons and Rifles and refuse to play a decent combined arms and I will spam back. And my spamming is superior to yours.
You could have played a decent game there and we would have instantly switched to combined arms ourselves, but we are just sick and tired of this meta-spam-a-move-until-callins-crap.
TLDR: OP doesn't like to get his cheese beaten by counter-cheese.
Just a shame that you try to hide it behind a thread about conversion abilities.
| Playercard of Siddolio | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1216
Posts: 1702
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
I won't challenge your 1's expertise if you don't challenge my 3's and 4's expertise.
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
 |
|
|
18 | ||
 |
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
25 | ||
 |
|
|
25 | ||
 |
|
|
17 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
