Login

russian armor

British Faction, what do you want to see?

PAGES (17)down
13 Apr 2015, 16:30 PM
#161
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Apr 2015, 16:29 PMKatitof

Just grab popcorn and enjoy the show.
I like the most the part where he pastes all of the stats because he have no slightest clue which ones are important or why smaller value can mean much bigger outcome.


Your free to actually try and prove I'm wrong, not seen a lot of that lately.
13 Apr 2015, 16:35 PM
#162
avatar of JHeartless

Posts: 1637



When talking about AoE suppression than the nearby multiplier is everything and for the maxim it's half of the other machine guns in the game. And the .40 cal has a better reload than the MG42 as well, and the targeting thing is mostly due to the fact the .50 cal has a smaller arc than the 42.

The cool down on the .50 cal is excellent to. Really dude I just think you haven't used it lately. The thing is fragile granted but it does it's job.


Please tell me how the nearby multiplier increases the AOE?

Anyway bottom line 1 MG can take MORE THAN A SECOND to acquire a target while the other takes just a fraction of a second.

I dont use the 50 because its bad. Everytime I use the 50 it turns out to be bad...Rifles are good. Rifles are greater than the 50 every time.

I will use the Rifle to capture an MG34 or 42 and always do better then with a 50. Because the 50 sucks. As does the DSHK and they are basically the same thing with the DSHK being better against Vehicles and having more surviability.

Please show me a 1v1 with you using a 50 Cal really good. You cant. Because it wont happen. Mainly because the 50 cal sucks.
13 Apr 2015, 16:38 PM
#163
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1



Please tell me how the nearby multiplier increases the AOE?

Anyway bottom line 1 MG can take MORE THAN A SECOND to acquire a target while the other takes just a fraction of a second.

I dont use the 50 because its bad. Everytime I use the 50 it turns out to be bad...Rifles are good. Rifles are greater than the 50 every time.

I will use the Rifle to capture an MG34 or 42 and always do better then with a 50. Because the 50 sucks. As does the DSHK and they are basically the same thing with the DSHK being better against Vehicles and having more surviability.

Please show me a 1v1 with you using a 50 Cal really good. You cant. Because it wont happen. Mainly because the 50 cal sucks.


Why is the be all and end all bar for performance 1's? Because Iv seen it used to great effect in 2's by my team mates and had it used to great effect against me!

The nearby multiplier is important because it means you can suppress multiple enemy infantry which is important when facing blobs. I adore capturing .50 calls when playing as OKW because it allows me to replace the shitty MG34 which really can't suppress worth a shit.

Anyway, back to topic.
13 Apr 2015, 17:34 PM
#164
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



Your free to actually try and prove I'm wrong, not seen a lot of that lately.

I've proven you wrong countless of times.
13 Apr 2015, 17:43 PM
#165
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Apr 2015, 17:34 PMKatitof

I've proven you wrong countless of times.


Saying something is true, does not make it so, friend.
13 Apr 2015, 19:09 PM
#166
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



Saying something is true, does not make it so, friend.

Just like saying you are right doesn't make you so.
13 Apr 2015, 19:24 PM
#167
avatar of BeltFedWombat
Patrion 14

Posts: 951

Will you stat monkeys go and get a bloody room? You're destroying a reasonably interesting thread.
13 Apr 2015, 19:37 PM
#168
avatar of Glendizzle

Posts: 149

I will cry myself to sleep for a week if there is no sexton. Mobile 25 pounder.... what's not to love? I think Achilles or firefly. Both maybe if one is doctrinal. I'd love to see an SAS style jeep. Great for wiping lone squads/recon. I want no trucks.... I do want a forward retreat point. Give us some non-doctrinal elite infantry. Churchill variants.. 2 or 3 would be good. One standard as nondoc and the others ... crocodile, mine plow, avre, etc doctrinal. Best allied at gun qf 17 pounder. Dunno about emplacements... arty of some sort for sure. perhaps an ability for a quick fusilade of rapid fire from Enfield rifles on infantry. Casualties need to be very costly for Brits.

Please no weird gimmick. Please.
13 Apr 2015, 19:56 PM
#169
avatar of daspoulos

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Permanently Banned
Please give us more squad wipes. I think brits deserve to wipe more than the russians.
13 Apr 2015, 19:59 PM
#170
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439

I hope they won't screw Brits up as this will be my faction of choice. I'm hoping for unique and diverse faction without retarded mechanics and perfectly designed tiers.

Oh and Firefly!
13 Apr 2015, 20:04 PM
#171
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
Yess Yess!

discuss balance ona faction that isnt in-game yet

You all must feel soo smart
13 Apr 2015, 20:10 PM
#172
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

I will cry myself to sleep for a week if there is no sexton. Mobile 25 pounder.... what's not to love? I think Achilles or firefly. Both maybe if one is doctrinal. I'd love to see an SAS style jeep. Great for wiping lone squads/recon. I want no trucks.... I do want a forward retreat point. Give us some non-doctrinal elite infantry. Churchill variants.. 2 or 3 would be good. One standard as nondoc and the others ... crocodile, mine plow, avre, etc doctrinal. Best allied at gun qf 17 pounder. Dunno about emplacements... arty of some sort for sure. perhaps an ability for a quick fusilade of rapid fire from Enfield rifles on infantry. Casualties need to be very costly for Brits.

Please no weird gimmick. Please.


Ah, yes.

Churchill/cromwell/universal carrier variants...

As well as mobile artillery...

(Because i suck at multi-quoting on an ipad) Daspoulos:
Please give us more squadwipes. I think brits deserve to wipe more than the russians.


The Churchill AVRE's with Pitard mortars and Cromwell VI's with 95mm howitzers shall rise...
13 Apr 2015, 21:02 PM
#173
avatar of Glendizzle

Posts: 149

I had an idea... doctrinal upgrade for muni/fuel/whatever for Churchill. Likely will be separate models but to have the nondoc be standard and a different upgrade in each doctrine seems like it could be neat.

They change the 221 to a 222 this way (in the field after recruitment) so you could use the same mechanic on Churchills
14 Apr 2015, 12:04 PM
#174
avatar of ThoseDeafMutes

Posts: 1026

Sexton 25 pounder could be a non-doc unit for the Brits. Non-doc SPART instead of rocket artillery would help differentiate them. But it would also make them not so "campy" since it's not just a stationary ground thing.
14 Apr 2015, 16:02 PM
#175
avatar of WingZero

Posts: 1484

For love of God, Relic please make Firefly non doctrinal at least.
14 Apr 2015, 17:02 PM
#176
avatar of van Voort
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2

Yess Yess!

discuss balance ona faction that isnt in-game yet

You all must feel soo smart


We need to discuss all possible ways it can be wrong so that relic will listen to us and not do any of them*


*More or less exact reasoning used by someone in the custom commanders thread
14 Apr 2015, 17:03 PM
#177
avatar of van Voort
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2

Boys AT Rifle:



Don't see why the Russians should get all the fun
14 Apr 2015, 19:43 PM
#178
avatar of Jackiebrown

Posts: 657

Boys AT Rifle:



Don't see why the Russians should get all the fun


I see nothing bad coming from this :megusta:
15 Apr 2015, 08:07 AM
#179
avatar of FaustCostBulletin

Posts: 521

Boys AT Rifle:



Don't see why the Russians should get all the fun


Is it just me or are those all the same guy? :O
15 Apr 2015, 09:41 AM
#180
avatar of US3K
Patrion 15

Posts: 104

I'd like the bren carrier to return with a coupling mechanic to static emplacements - give Brits the 17 and 25 pounder but have them moveable only if coupled with a bren, and crews that can demount from the weapon the same way USF crews can demount. That way you build a gun, if you want it elsewhere you demount the crew, couple it to the bren and load the crew into it, then drive away and set up elsewhere.

From a historical/campaign point of view if we're looking at a north African campaign it reflects the way they'd capture guns from each other.

Don't think it'd be too hard to do or too gimmicky - you'd balance the guns with less range maybe and an appropriate set-up time. The Americans can demount from their vehicles so why not let the Brits demount from crewed weapons
PAGES (17)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

678 users are online: 678 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49859
Welcome our newest member, jockey746
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM