Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » FHQ and PTRS cons blob, detroy the early games!

FHQ and PTRS cons blob, detroy the early games!

PAGES (1)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
atouba
5 Apr 2015, 06:34 AM
#1
avatar of atouba

Posts: 482

http://www.coh2.org/replay/33077/fhq-and-ptrs-cons-blobs-detroys-the-early-games

This replay shows how the early game can be detroyed by PTRS cons blob and FHQ...

It's a 4v4 game. Both are arranged teams. 4 soviet players just spamm the cons and 2 players go to PTRS commander which can kill infantry squards very quickly. Should the PTRS rifles kill infantry so quickly???

And in last patch note, relic said:
"We have aimed to create a more evenly measured match where Axis and Allies have equal advantages from start to finish. Reduce the temporal effect that we were seeing in data, where allies have an early advantage at a higher VP count."

So does this replay show us an equal early game? The FHQ tactics has always been a huge advantage to Allies for a long long time. Then relic has done nothing about it yet...



And relic said:
"Improve the already existing blob counters, in non-lethal ways."

So why katyusha hits the field so early countering infantry blobs so effectively, while what Ostheer players can do is just waiting for the high tech cost usless panzerwerfer???


Katitof PLS SHUT UP. This guy always protects soviet without thinking:D
Playercard of ATOUBA

4v4: Pstreak: - 1with LIBIDO, [CHN]DarkTuzki, & LittleeStone
4v4: Pstreak: - 2with LIBIDO, [CHN]DarkTuzki, & LittleeStone


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Nuclear Arbitor
5 Apr 2015, 07:07 AM
#2
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

maybe we'll get a fix in a month or two.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
ASneakyFox
5 Apr 2015, 07:16 AM
#3
avatar of ASneakyFox

Posts: 365

ive not noticed PTRS being "OP" vs infantry personally. I even did PTRS builds my last 2 games to test out the complaints on them.

PTRS is definitely a lot better- but as far as i can tell I'm not winning engagements vs infantry with PTRS that I wouldn't have won with unupgraded conscripts. You really need a group of 3-4 conscripts with PTRS's to really tear in to some infantry- but 3-4 squads of conscripts tear in to some infantry anyway....

I feel like if anything the PTRS is just brought up to the point of not causing a anti-infantry nerf to squads holding the PTRS.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
newvan
5 Apr 2015, 07:29 AM
#4
avatar of newvan

Posts: 354

In this particular game, Katyushas and incendiary artillery did a lot more then PTRS. And it's a little bit ironic, like CAS in team games isn't abuse at all.
Playercard of newvan

2v2: Pstreak: + 3
2v2: Pstreak: + 2
2v2: Pstreak: + 2
2v2: Pstreak: - 1


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
ofield
5 Apr 2015, 07:48 AM
#5
avatar of ofield

Posts: 420

jump backJump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 07:16 AMASneakyFox
ive not noticed PTRS being "OP" vs infantry personally. I even did PTRS builds my last 2 games to test out the complaints on them.

PTRS is definitely a lot better- but as far as i can tell I'm not winning engagements vs infantry with PTRS that I wouldn't have won with unupgraded conscripts. You really need a group of 3-4 conscripts with PTRS's to really tear in to some infantry- but 3-4 squads of conscripts tear in to some infantry anyway....

I feel like if anything the PTRS is just brought up to the point of not causing a anti-infantry nerf to squads holding the PTRS.


3-4 ptrs squads are manageable, but 5-8, which i encountered last night, just fuck over everything. The gun of a HMG Team gets destroyed before the crew is dead, even when placed in heavy cover.
jump backJump back to quoted post11 Mar 2015, 07:35 AMKatitof
I will simply lol at anyone expecting such a change to a 2 year old general use infantry.
Equally possible are pershing for USF, IS-3 for soviets or ober nerf for OKW.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
some one
5 Apr 2015, 07:49 AM
#6
avatar of some one

Posts: 935

jump backJump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 07:07 AMNuclear Arbitor
maybe we'll get a fix in a month or two.

normaly six. They working hard on it
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
RMMLz
5 Apr 2015, 08:51 AM
#7
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

The problem was, and is the stupid FHQ. I mean, instant FHQ in neutral territory? What the fuck.

http://dadmand-art.ir/
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
OZtheWiZARD
5 Apr 2015, 09:10 AM
#8
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439

Forward HQ gives bonuses to units. You can't even establish what was the problem in the first place yet you come shouting to the balance forum.
My DeviantArt gallery
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Katitof
5 Apr 2015, 09:20 AM
#9
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Stopped reading at "It's a 4v4 game".

Judging by the title, its a thread complaining that people blob in blobfest mode, right?
jump backJump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Neo
5 Apr 2015, 09:39 AM
#10
avatar of Neo

Posts: 471

jump backJump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 09:20 AMKatitof
Stopped reading at "It's a 4v4 game".

Judging by the title, its a thread complaining that people blob in blobfest mode, right?


This would be a valid point if people didn't blob in every game mode, including 1v1.

USF/SOV/OKW blobs are still as prevalent as before. Indeed, with the advent of Dank Hunters, cons are now able to blob even more.

OKW still blobs, the blob is just a little weaker than it used to be.

Without a + in received damage/accuracy for blobbed units I fear this game will never overcome the blob meta.
Playercard of Neo

1v1: Pstreak: - 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 1
1v1: Pstreak: - 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 1


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
BeltFedWombat
5 Apr 2015, 10:04 AM
#11
avatar of BeltFedWombat
Patrion 14

Posts: 951

jump backJump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 09:20 AMKatitof
Stopped reading at "It's a 4v4 game".

Judging by the title, its a thread complaining that people blob in blobfest mode, right?


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
QueenRatchet123
5 Apr 2015, 10:07 AM
#12
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
4v4 is land of cheese

u done got cheesed

cheese back

on topic: ptrs is op
jump backJump back to quoted post17 Aug 2015, 14:01 PMJohnnyB

There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
atouba
5 Apr 2015, 11:49 AM
#13
avatar of atouba

Posts: 482

Yeah the problem in the first place is the FHQ. The FHQ makes PTRS spams more terrable and effective. You always need to check out the soviet oppent 's commanders before the match to make sure he doesn't bring a FHQ commander.

As I said before,the FHQ should only be built on owned territory, pushing FHQ on enemy territory has always given the Allies a huge early advantage.












Playercard of ATOUBA

4v4: Pstreak: - 1with LIBIDO, [CHN]DarkTuzki, & LittleeStone
4v4: Pstreak: - 2with LIBIDO, [CHN]DarkTuzki, & LittleeStone


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
sluzbenik
5 Apr 2015, 12:27 PM
#14
avatar of sluzbenik

Posts: 879

I love FHQs. It means I just have to position some MGs around it and press incendiary barrage on the mortar HT once in a while. EZ wins.

That said the big "I win" building on Ettbruck or whatever the frack that's called and the church on Trois Points are stone and thus have insanely high HP and take two stuka barrages to kill, and the incendiary barrage won't set them on fire.

Which just goes to show that the whole FHQ thing is stupid and a bad design choice given that COH2 maps have far fewer territories to cap. FHQs were annoying but not batshit OP in vCOH because a) you could still hold significant territory while fighting an FHQ and b) no combat bonuses. It's another stupid COH2 cartoon game gimmick. I don't think they should be upgradable at all in neutral territory.

Just remember, it's a fun, casual RTS!
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
RMMLz
5 Apr 2015, 12:31 PM
#15
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 09:39 AMNeo



Without a + in received damage/accuracy for blobbed units I fear this game will never overcome the blob meta.


Yup.

jump backJump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 12:27 PMsluzbenik
I love FHQs. It means I just have to position some MGs around it and press incendiary barrage on the mortar HT once in a while. EZ wins.

That said the big "I win" building on Ettbruck or whatever the frack that's called and the church on Trois Points are stone and thus have insanely high HP and take two stuka barrages to kill, and the incendiary barrage won't set them on fire.

Which just goes to show that the whole FHQ thing is stupid and a bad design choice given that COH2 maps have far fewer territories to cap. FHQs were annoying but not batshit OP in vCOH because a) you could still hold significant territory while fighting an FHQ and b) no combat bonuses. It's another stupid COH2 cartoon game gimmick. I don't think they should be upgradable at all in neutral territory.

Just remember, it's a fun, casual RTS!


and c) you were only able to make a FHQ on owned, connected territory.

http://dadmand-art.ir/
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Brachiaraidos
5 Apr 2015, 18:54 PM
#16
avatar of Brachiaraidos

Posts: 627

People always seem to yell about connecting territory as if it's somehow hard in 4v4's.

Take Ettelbruck. You can stick a squad right into the building you want, have your and your ally back cap all points between yourself and it with the first squads to arrive, and the building will keep your engineers alive long enough to pop it as soon as you hit 60 fuel as usual.

It may change the exact building you pick in some instances, but pushing your enemy off their fuel is massive anyway. One player loses 60 fuel, but the enemy team loses 20 per minute between them if not more. So long as you only have to swap house every 4 minutes or so you're onto a winner, will horribly out tech your opponent and win with ease.

Teamwork and good play provided, of course. By the time you get to 3cp for the mortar halftracks it should be a done deal.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
atouba
7 Apr 2015, 13:49 PM
#17
avatar of atouba

Posts: 482

jump backJump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 18:54 PMBrachiaraidos
People always seem to yell about connecting territory as if it's somehow hard in 4v4's.

Take Ettelbruck. You can stick a squad right into the building you want, have your and your ally back cap all points between yourself and it with the first squads to arrive, and the building will keep your engineers alive long enough to pop it as soon as you hit 60 fuel as usual.

It may change the exact building you pick in some instances, but pushing your enemy off their fuel is massive anyway. One player loses 60 fuel, but the enemy team loses 20 per minute between them if not more. So long as you only have to swap house every 4 minutes or so you're onto a winner, will horribly out tech your opponent and win with ease.

Teamwork and good play provided, of course. By the time you get to 3cp for the mortar halftracks it should be a done deal.


Absolutely yes. Pushing the enemy off their fuel point is always a huge advantage for allies...The game will end in 15 min and no fuel no tanks no Walking stuka. And quickly T34s and Katyushas destroy the german army.
Playercard of ATOUBA

4v4: Pstreak: - 1with LIBIDO, [CHN]DarkTuzki, & LittleeStone
4v4: Pstreak: - 2with LIBIDO, [CHN]DarkTuzki, & LittleeStone


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Porygon
7 Apr 2015, 13:53 PM
#18
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

jump backJump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 06:34 AMatouba

Katitof PLS SHUT UP. This guy always protects soviet without thinking:D




I thought there are only the Japanese still fighting as Axis at the far east. Berlin had fallen, why still fighting against the inevitable? :)
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
shadowwada
7 Apr 2015, 17:45 PM
#19
avatar of shadowwada

Posts: 137

jump backJump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 07:49 AMsome one

normaly six. They working hard on it

lol
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (1)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
0 user is browsing this thread:
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » FHQ and PTRS cons blob, detroy the early games!

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
9
 Download
Download
1231
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

464 users are online: 464 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49063
Welcome our newest member, jennifermary
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM