Do you use them ? Like them ?
I personnaly like to use them, i feel that even if they are easy to dodge, the enemy units have to go out of cover and it can be decisive for an infantry fight.
Sometimes i also like to use them to create a wall of flame to prevent AssPio and AssGren to close the distance
For or against molotovs
13 Mar 2015, 09:45 AM
#1
Posts: 23
13 Mar 2015, 09:49 AM
#2
Posts: 521
Yep, they give me a warm feeling.
Find out about my redesign of all four factions, with more to come!
Feel free to contact me regarding your Attribute Editor-related questions.
Feel free to contact me regarding your Attribute Editor-related questions.
13 Mar 2015, 09:52 AM
#3
Posts: 273
the best ability to deny enemy from a cover (deny cover from enemy, I dont know which phrase is true 
)
)
13 Mar 2015, 10:01 AM
#4
Posts: 168
I was thinking molotovs would be in a better spot if
1) Instead of slow aoe damage, they would instantly wipe squads and buildings alike caught in the flames
2) The cost would be reduced to 10 munitions
A longer cooldown might be needed to make it not as spammable, though
1) Instead of slow aoe damage, they would instantly wipe squads and buildings alike caught in the flames
2) The cost would be reduced to 10 munitions
A longer cooldown might be needed to make it not as spammable, though
13 Mar 2015, 10:03 AM
#5
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Get 3 molotov bulletins.
Get vet 2 with Cons.
Throw molotov like rifle nade
Get vet 2 with Cons.
Throw molotov like rifle nade
13 Mar 2015, 10:15 AM
#6
Posts: 1225
Molotovs are extremely important and beneficial well into the midgame, not so much because they kill stuff - good players will evade them - but because they force a reposition/deny houses, and that wins you all the infantry fights and snowballs into map dominance with a conscript heavy strat.
13 Mar 2015, 10:20 AM
#7
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Get 3 molotov bulletins.
Get vet 2 with Cons.
Throw molotov like rifle nade
hey, good idea
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
13 Mar 2015, 10:53 AM
#8
9 
Posts: 1094 | Subs: 20
1) Instead of slow aoe damage, they would instantly wipe squads and buildings alike caught in the flames
sure thing buddy
13 Mar 2015, 11:10 AM
#9
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
I was thinking molotovs would be in a better spot if
1) Instead of slow aoe damage, they would instantly wipe squads and buildings alike caught in the flames
2) The cost would be reduced to 10 munitions
A longer cooldown might be needed to make it not as spammable, though
Seems perfectly fair ! lets push on master right meow !
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 PM
#10
5 
Posts: 615
I was thinking molotovs would be in a better spot if
1) Instead of slow aoe damage, they would instantly wipe squads and buildings alike caught in the flames
2) The cost would be reduced to 10 munitions
A longer cooldown might be needed to make it not as spammable, though
Yeah...that would totally be a good idea... :-/ Or, alternatively it'd be absolutely insane. :-P
I tend to go for AT nades and rarely bother with molotovs.
13 Mar 2015, 12:24 PM
#11
Posts: 1355
I like them. The only thing i would say is that the throwing takes to long.
13 Mar 2015, 12:25 PM
#12
Posts: 471
I think they take too long too throw to be any use against mid and high skill players.
The animation is very long and very obvious - most people who are paying attention will dodge them.
I've pretty much stopped using them.
The animation is very long and very obvious - most people who are paying attention will dodge them.
I've pretty much stopped using them.
13 Mar 2015, 13:12 PM
#13
Posts: 1042
I see the ability getting stuck half way through and doing nothing, it's very aggravating to say the least.
Personally, they could be thrown a little faster, but really the only really issue is rng, sometimes I've seen it kill 2-3 guys in an MG or gren squad, othertimes its like the flames aren't there, but that's a problem with all flamers.
Personally, they could be thrown a little faster, but really the only really issue is rng, sometimes I've seen it kill 2-3 guys in an MG or gren squad, othertimes its like the flames aren't there, but that's a problem with all flamers.
13 Mar 2015, 13:13 PM
#14
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
I was thinking molotovs would be in a better spot if
1) Instead of slow aoe damage, they would instantly wipe squads and buildings alike caught in the flames
2) The cost would be reduced to 10 munitions
A longer cooldown might be needed to make it not as spammable, though
Blah Blah Blah. Are you a Soviet fanboy or something?
13 Mar 2015, 13:17 PM
#15
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Blah Blah Blah. Are you a Soviet fanboy or something?
This is an obvious troll
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
13 Mar 2015, 13:55 PM
#16
1 Posts: 2885
Blah Blah Blah. Are you a Soviet fanboy or something?
He's just refering to infiltration nades. And I must say he's got the point.
13 Mar 2015, 15:25 PM
#17
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
He's just refering to infiltration nades. And I must say he's got the point.
No, he does not have a point. Molotovs are in good place, specially early game. I prefer molotovs to nades, every half decent player can dodge nades, but molotovs deny cover, the force you to change position and if you let your MG or ATG stay inside it's AoE, you're gonna regret it.
Don't try to pin this on OKW. OKW's got a thousand problems but infiltration nades are ain't one. The OP is either trolling, which is fine, or suggesting Molotov buffs. Those are pure buffs.
13 Mar 2015, 15:28 PM
#18
Posts: 1702
Molotovs, design wise, are just simply bullshit.
I mean why do we need to have a spammable, core infantry unit like conscripts, have a total RNG grenade? Sometimes the molotovs does amazing and triple flame crits squads, eveporates MGs and is amazing. Sometimes units sit in the flames for 5+ seconds and take no damage.
They just need to deal fast, and more consistent damage.
I mean why do we need to have a spammable, core infantry unit like conscripts, have a total RNG grenade? Sometimes the molotovs does amazing and triple flame crits squads, eveporates MGs and is amazing. Sometimes units sit in the flames for 5+ seconds and take no damage.
They just need to deal fast, and more consistent damage.
13 Mar 2015, 15:38 PM
#19
Posts: 137
Do you use them ? Like them ?
I personnaly like to use them, i feel that even if they are easy to dodge, the enemy units have to go out of cover and it can be decisive for an infantry fight.
Sometimes i also like to use them to create a wall of flame to prevent AssPio and AssGren to close the distance
4
13 Mar 2015, 15:49 PM
#20
Posts: 23
Molotovs, design wise, are just simply bullshit.
I mean why do we need to have a spammable, core infantry unit like conscripts, have a total RNG grenade? Sometimes the molotovs does amazing and triple flame crits squads, eveporates MGs and is amazing. Sometimes units sit in the flames for 5+ seconds and take no damage.
They just need to deal fast, and more consistent damage.
I actually like Coh because of the RNG. I find Starcraft 2 pretty boring. and the gren Nade is not 100% reliable as well.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
SHOUT IT OUT!
SupremeStefan: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3457737797
Last Friday, 12:42 PM
Last Friday, 12:42 PM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus 
Last Wednesday, 00:16 AM
Last Wednesday, 00:16 AM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" 
Last Tuesday, 20:29 PM
Last Tuesday, 20:29 PM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
Last Tuesday, 02:36 AM
Last Tuesday, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy 
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. 
.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
.24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Livestreams
 |
|
|
153 | ||
|
|
|
|
51 | ||
|
|
|
|
24 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
164 | ||
|
|
|
|
42 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
12 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.43163.872+9
- 2.59482.879+8
- 3.800454.638-1
- 4.13044.747+4
- 5.286162.638+4
- 6.313114.733+9
- 7.370253.594+6
- 8.17951.778+2
- 9.17773.708+3
- 10.371284.566-1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
14
Download
1357
Board Info
441 users are online:
441 guests
1 post in the last 24h
11 posts in the last week
74 posts in the last month
11 posts in the last week
74 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53344
Welcome our newest member, Barna728
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Barna728
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM