7 
Posts: 1664
My bad, I thought he was saying about 76 but SU, not T34/76.
That's what happens when you see only "76" without SU or T before
T34/76 is fine. Maybe little better AI but overall it's good.
At least I find them very useful.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Guys, in one match a T34/76 wiped 2 full shrecked volk squads one after another in 2 successive shots. I couldn't believe my eyes. You realy underestimate this tank. I love it when I'm playing with it, hate it when playing against. It's not by far as weak as you tend to present it.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
I have once killed panther with SU-76.
I suppose SU-76 is perfectly fine and balanced unit now.
Posts: 1130
Sounds like entirely bad luck with RNG, im pretty sure hypothetically a Panzer IV or HE Sherman could do the same....
Posts: 1248
My reasoning is 320mp is too much for an engineer unit that lacks demo charges, flame throwers or a heavy AT mine. They have decent early game DPS but is that really worth another 150mp over other engie units when their reinforce cost is already more expensive? Maybe back in WFA alpha when they were early game terminators but post-nerf Sturms even lose to a single con squad in cover.
The current replacement cost means if you lose your initial sturm squad to a stray mortar round or grenade you have to waste an extortionate amount of MP for just to get back the ability to counter demo charges/mines. Lose a second squad and it will be GG right there, the Paul vs Jesulin final a few days ago was a good example of this.
Just to highlight the difference in cost but say you lose three sweeper squads over the course of an entire game that would be 960mp, in comparison the Soviets would have to spend a meagre 510 and sweepers are a much more vital part of army composition for OKW than the Sovits.
I suggest the initial purchasing cost be adjusted to 270mp down from 320mp, the reinforce cost would stay the same so "Sturm spam" would not become a problem.
14 
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently Banned
axis
Posts: 2053
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
-Thread is about Sturmpios
-Telling people to use a tank to roll over infantry because it is a better method than the main gun is sad as hell.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
-Thread is about Sturmpios
-Telling people to use a tank to roll over infantry because it is a better method than the main gun is sad as hell.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Correct but what do people actually expect from the t-34 its stats slightly lower then the p4's but thats fine considering the cost. want a better t-34 its going to need a price increase.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
I have once killed panther with SU-76.
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
