No more retarded single player expansions that take time away from the only fun part of the game please.
I had a lot of fun with Ardennes Assault.
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
No more retarded single player expansions that take time away from the only fun part of the game please.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
I had a lot of fun with Ardennes Assault.
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Posts: 133
Relic, if you add the USSR against Japan. I am soooo happy:
- Not German Axis faction
- new Soviets
Posts: 149
So, I did to? If even a fraction of the resources they spent on it was put into fixing the multiplayer the game wouldn't be in nearly as horrible a state as it is in right now.
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
If u looked at van voort's thread you'd know we hardcore mp users are the VAST minority. Thus we couldn't fund the studio without the comp stomp and sp crowds.
They need to make money to continue patching the game. And personally I don't think balance is completely atrocious. It's not perfect either. Optimization isn't. Even still this is the best game I've played in years.
For the record I liked AA but feel I paid too much for it. I'm considering the rest an investment on future work on the game.
I think they will add another faction. It's pretty obvious at this point this game isn't going to be an esport. The balance will be trickier with brits but so what. It's not going to hurt anything and it helps relic stay in business. Not exactly win win but I'm all for it.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
If u looked at van voort's thread you'd know we hardcore mp users are the VAST minority. Thus we couldn't fund the studio without the comp stomp and sp crowds.
They need to make money to continue patching the game. And personally I don't think balance is completely atrocious. It's not perfect either. Optimization isn't. Even still this is the best game I've played in years.
For the record I liked AA but feel I paid too much for it. I'm considering the rest an investment on future work on the game.
I think they will add another faction. It's pretty obvious at this point this game isn't going to be an esport. The balance will be trickier with brits but so what. It's not going to hurt anything and it helps relic stay in business. Not exactly win win but I'm all for it.
Posts: 276
Posts: 300
No more retarded single player expansions that take time away from the only fun part of the game please.
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Problem is as explained above the Japs would make 0 sense as a multiplayer faction and the marines would mirror current USF by like 97% anyway. So with that being said I cant see anything else to do but singleplayer
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 249
It's not strange that SP has been more played than MP. I think this applies to most games in general, even if they are focused on the multiplayer.
Posts: 32
Posts: 978
It's so obvious that that all axis players care about is tanks. Because everyone who suggests a new german factionn completely forgets that they have no small arms left to use. More stg, schreks, and lmg42s? RElic would have to copy paste a infantry to get another faction since they used almost every combination between OKW and Wher already.Just to annoy you, here´s a new German faction I developed within 5mins out of my mind:
Posts: 4928
Just to annoy you, here´s a new German faction I developed within 5mins out of my mindITT German Fantasy Factions!
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
Posts: 2053
commonwealth armies would be much more interesting for me.
Posts: 440
Posts: 657
All Japs would do is mirror the current situation for the US, no heavy tanks. They can add the British in then and have a commander that allows to call in Marine assets for the US. Plus Germans would make up any shortage of heavy tanks the Japs have in team games.
Problem is as explained above the Japs would make 0 sense as a multiplayer faction and the marines would mirror current USF by like 97% anyway. So with that being said I cant see anything else to do but singleplayer
17 |