4 
Posts: 640 | Subs: 1
It was nerfed once into totally worthless state, 30 muni for increasing acceleration a little bit and little RNG protection, and Allies fanboy stated HOW USEFUL it is, and it is buffed again to this state.Fanboyism aside, it was useless during its (brief) nerf period.
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
1 
Posts: 1276
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Secure mode is fine on T70, but on tanks like the IS-2 and KV-2 it just smacks of lazy design.
I think the T-34, IS-2, and KV-2 deserve to have real abilities awarded to them that compliment their use in the game.
4 Posts: 640 | Subs: 1
If you changed the ability to be a passive decap that would be unbalanced as people run around the map cutting territories like no other.I am not sure this would be the case. You would need multiple vetted tanks, and you would need to split them up to achieve any real capping maneuvers. Thus playing against Soviets would achieve nice asymmetrical gameplay : they have no stock heavy hitters like the Panther, but where the US has vehicle crews and flexible forward retreat points, and OKW has superheavies and 5 levels of vet, Soviets would then have capping powah.
.
Posts: 135
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
4 Posts: 640 | Subs: 1
i like secure moe nd use it often: chase off harrassing obers or pios with t34 and recap the point --> very good, why is everyone complaining?It is not useless, of course. I myself had that nail-biting IS2-securemode-at-1VP victory. Certainly this ability can win you the game when applied properly.
Posts: 1026
15 
Posts: 786
Posts: 1162
I'd let the tank keep firing while securing, and disable the capping when the tank is moving
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
No. A lone tank should not be simultaneously allowed to halt an enemy cap AND shoot at them, that would be op.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
4 Posts: 640 | Subs: 1
No. A lone tank should not be simultaneously allowed to halt an enemy cap AND shoot at them, that would be op.If you are used to Soviets having useless abilities, then yes, I see how introducing a useful one would be considered OP.
Posts: 449
Posts: 1484
 | Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 38
if territory capping at vet1 was passive and always on, would Secure Mode become overpowered, keeping Blitzkrieg in mind?
4 Posts: 640 | Subs: 1
Of course. Tanks are rapid response vehicles that infantry simply can't compete with in terms of map control.Are you implying that in this scenario Soviet player has 1 Veteran tank for every potential Axis infantry squad capping, and there are no Axis tanks on the field?
Posts: 38
Posts: 2053
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
Vet 1 munitions cap point that instantly captures 5 random points on the map upon use.
Should be in line with a small munitions cost saving 175 fuel tanks as well as ending tanks by blitzlolling through at guns without a care and killing the target.
 |
|
|
47 | ||
|
|
|
|
34 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
15 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
