stug E assault tank
Posts: 1026
Posts: 123
Posts: 1637
If that was the true we'd have about 50 threads to nerf SU-76 a day.
I can't even imagine how bad you have to be to achieve that result.
AT Riflenade FTW
Posts: 419
Are people talking about how it's on par with T34 AI or "as OP as the SU76" serious? I mean, I don't think it's an OP unit, but I don't know how you could deny that it's a very effective AI platform. It has a good ROF and thanks to unit clumping can be exceptionally deadly at times. Based on my experience it's much more effective than T34 at wiping large numbers of infantry. And it's cheap, comes with a good doctrine, and doesn't require teching! The comparison to a T3/T4 stock soviet unit seems puzzling.While the stug e is in fact better at killing infantry I agree, in practice it's as good as fighting 6 man squads as a t34 is fighting 4 man squads. Although the real benefit comes from fighting grouped up blobs, in which the the stug e does really shine.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
The StuG E has the lowest health of any axis medium tank in the game!
Posts: 351
Posts: 2470
Posts: 4928
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently BannedPosts: 419
Posts: 2053
Posts: 4928
Posts: 747
stug e in a 1v1 in a players hands with good micro is just way to cost effective at 6cp with the current soviet tech costs... is that good enough for everyone coming back with a smart ass answer..it 2 shots squads sometimes 1 shots.. its a huge impact for 230 mp and like 75 fuel and no tech required... and soon comes a tiger..
I agree, it's extremly effective when one knows how to use it but so is pretty much every unit in game when in the hands of a top player.
It's not that you need to tech to counter it, PTRS Guards and AT-Nades can handle it, or at lesast keep it at bay long enough for you to tech.
Posts: 2470
People have a problem with this tank? Its usually dead before its capable of doing something. IMO its performance is right for its price comparing other tanks that cost about the same. They OP too as well?
USF hates it. soviets don't really care.
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
I agree, it's extremly effective when one knows how to use it but so is pretty much every unit in game when in the hands of a top player.
It's not that you need to tech to counter it, PTRS Guards and AT-Nades can handle it, or at lesast keep it at bay long enough for you to tech.
This. Most players go T2 so one simple ATG can effectively counter StuG E. At nades are very effective, and PTRS in good hands can keep it back. And it does not squad wipe as much as people say it does. Maybe if they whole squad is squeezed behind some object after the infantry grouping patch, but not other wise.
Posts: 369
Posts: 551
Posts: 62
If that was the true we'd have about 50 threads to nerf SU-76 a day.
It was sarcasm, as in both units are neither OP, though the SU-76 is up in regards that it should really be a mobile ZiS and not a peashooter. The Stug-E does what it does though could be tougher.
Posts: 1637
I don't even know what to say, this commander is one of the few things that keeps Ostheer competative with USF and you think it should be nerfed?
The StuG E has the lowest health of any axis medium tank in the game!
Because its a light tank. Not a medium tank.
Livestreams
57 | |||||
42 | |||||
12 | |||||
17 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.643231.736+3
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.921406.694-1
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
3 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, carter44
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM